New "Protocols of the Zion sages"

The prosperity of a particular political party depends on its relationship with the Kremlin. Such a simple truth can be extracted from the opinions of political scientists and political journalists. They write intensively that the Kremlin “pushes” the homeland and encourages a batch of pensioners (where, instead of an obedient curtains, obedient Igor Zotov is delivered) that there is a system of “pure” and “unclean” parties. All this is stated calmly, with Russian joyful fatalism. Without indignation, even without a shadow of indignation. Then, as there should be indignation. There must be indignation.

Moreover, the fact that a politician managed from the Kremlin was established in Russia does not violate any harmony. For the most part, Russian society continues to consider Russia democracy. The Kremlin manipulators increased the passing barrier to the State Duma from 5% to 7%, achieved the transition to the State Duma elections exclusively on party lists, brought the minimum number of parties from 10 thousand to 50 thousand people, introduced COCE CHICA on the quarterly financial reports of the parties. But the main thing was committed under Yeltsin: the right to register or refuse to register the party, which means that the Ministry of Justice appropriated the right to give or not to give the party to the voter, that is, the structure subordinate to the Kremlin.

Politically, the president and United Russia are just one of the parties to the conflict (or drama, tragedy, if you want). They should not have the right to decide the fate of their competitors. There should be a neutral organization. The Federal Registration Service has been created, but it acts under the auspices of the Ministry of Justice. And the Ministry of Justice in our country, as with kings and Bolshevik Caesars, works for the owner - on the head of state.

In short, there is no policy in Russia. I came to this conclusion a long time ago, now I only lay out everything on the shelves of my understanding. But if there are no politicians, then there are many hundreds of square meters of the newspaper surface, allegedly filled with political news, that there are hundreds of hours of radio programs dedicated to politics with the participation of political scientists and all kinds of directors of all kinds of centers? Yes, so, chatter, I have ... In the Saratov Central Prison in the Third Corps, we, Zeki, stood, I remember, under the stairs and buzzing about this, waiting for us to be taken to the "court-domestic". That's how Russian politics. Chat, pigeons, chat ...

Politics is actually an action, not a chatter about this. I have already written more than once that in the Russian Federation there are enough political parties, there are enough public associations of citizens, but there is no one element, without which nothing is possible, namely, courage for action. In the created conditions (the full control of the Putin group over the election process), participation in the State Duma elections is possible only in the protest manner, in order to expose the false essence of such controlled elections. That we, the National-Bolshevik party, are going to make, confuse all the cards.

The complaint of Savenko (Limonova), Volynz, Averin, Fomuchenko, Dmitriev - members of the NBP against the Russian Federation, challenging the liquidation of the NBP has just gone to the European Court of Human Rights. Among other things, the complaint says: “During the period of the NBP, its members were repeatedly prosecuted by law enforcement agencies. (Followed by examples.) At the same time, the criminal prosecution of NBP members and police control (observation) were carried out by specialized law enforcement agencies created to combat banditry, terrorism and extremist. Applications. Representatives of the Russian Federation publicly declared their intolerance to the NBP. NBP in 1998-2003 was one of the grounds for its elimination. In this regard, applicants argue that the court decision on the liquidation of the NBP was an act of state suppression of the political opposition in the Russian Federation. "

Among the applications to the complaint to the European court, I was shocked by the number 14 - a report of Major A.I. Tretyakov dated December 15, 2004 to his chief - to the head of the Organized Crime Control Department of the GUVD of Moscow to Colonel P.A. Pavlyuk. I note that the report was written the day after the forty National Bolshes was peacefully seized by the reception of the presidential administration. Here is the text of this police document with minor reductions. Society must know its police officers.

"The report. I report that the 2nd department 5 of the ORC in the ATB of the Central Internal Affairs Directorate of the city of Moscow carries out the operational support of the criminal case # 300188, instituted by the prosecutor's office of the Central Administrative District of Moscow on the grounds of the crime under Article 214, 167 hours 2. (The following are the names of the fortune of the action on December 14 - from Angirova V.V. to Chernova N.Yu.) did not abandon the intentions of extremist activities, including the seizure of state power and administration, as well as the leaders of the NBP (followed by the names) of such promotions on the territory of Moscow. Application to them of criminal -procedural measures.

In the period from November 29 to 30, 2004, in the premises of the theater-studio of facial and gesture (Moscow, Izmailovsky Boulevard, 39/4) under the chairmanship of E. Limonov (Savenko), the 5th Constituent Congress of the so-called National Bolshevik Party took place, in which 672 people took part, of 56 subjects of Russia, as well as Ukraine, Azerbaijan, Azerbaijan. Belarus and Estonia.

The main issue of the congress was the re -election of the party leadership, as well as the development of a program of actions consisting of the following blocks:

• Registration of NBP in the justice bodies as a political party, which will allow more efficient campaigning with the population, participate in election campaigns, and use free of charge in the media to promote their ideas.

• The seizure of power in Russia by carrying out the bourgeois (!) Revolution according to the "Georgian-Ukrainian" scenario, for which it is planned to escape social contradictions in Russian society together with the opposition forces. For this purpose, it is indicated about the need for operational response to arising social conflicts (problems of Russian refugees, the abolition of benefits, events in Beslan, etc.

• The organization of mass riots that should develop into a bourgeois revolution and lead to an illegitimate change in the regime.

• Cooperation with emissaries of illegal armed groups of Chechnya. The delegates of the congress stated that the “Chechen opposition” is revolutionaries, the seizure of hostages in Beslan is an act of despair on their part, a response to the elections of the president of the Chechen Republic.

• The initiation of social shocks in the country during the 2007-2008 elections, the reason for which may be the data distributed through the media about the alleged falsifications. It was stated that the fact of falsifications will be only an occasion to bring people to the streets.

• The leadership of the NBP indicated processes and, as a result, forcible seizure of power and the replacement of the current president of Russia, with the subsequent elimination of opposition forces.

In addition, it is stated that the party has and will increase the experience of the captures of state institutions.

According to the information received, the total number of funds spent on the organization and conduct of the Congress is about 100 thousand US dollars, and the amount of about 10 million rubles are at the disposal of E. Limonov ... Thus, the program and activities of the party participants pose a real threat to the national security of the Russian Federation, the leaders and active members of the NBP did not refuse extremist activities, setting the ultimate goal of the seizure of power ...

Deputy Head of 2 Division 5 of the ORC under the Organized Crime Control Department of the Central Internal Affairs Directorate of Moscow Major of the police A.I. Tretyakov ".

I will have a little comments:

1. It is wild to hear that the NBP is planning a "bourgeois" revolution. Many Yablors and members of the ATP will not agree, I think, with this statement.

2. I repeated and repeat that Putin should leave. The change of power, of course, should occur peacefully. For this, there are political parties to dispute power. To blame the political party of that she wants to come to power is savage. We will leave the word "capture" on the conscience of Major UBOP.

3. Major Tretyakov’s report was attached to U/D # 300188, and his recommendations were adopted by the prosecutor's office, and then by the court. 39 National Bolshes were initially accused of forcibly seizure of power, and then of organizing riots.

4. Neither I nor the other leaders of the NBP have never seen NVF Chechnya near the emissaries. Unless in prison they were sitting in the cells. But those with whom we were sitting have already killed Russian special services in Russian prisons.

5. The reaction to arising social conflicts (problems of Russian refugees, the abolition of benefits, events in Beslan) is the obligation of any political party, and is not a crime. In general, not one of the points listed by the major, charged with the guilty of the NBP and allegedly announced at the congress, is not a crime, and the sink has nothing to poke his unclean hands there. Take the bandits, there are a lot of them in your environment. Only under the kings and with Soviet absolutism, the reaction to social conflicts and participation in them was considered a crime.

6. I do not even have one million rubles, the Kremlin spent hundreds of millions of dollars on the organization of "our". But where did Mr. Surkov get them? It’s good if the independent deputies of the State Duma became interested in this and demanded explanations from the prosecutor’s office - where?

7. In fact, the report of Major Organization is a kind of “protocols of the Zion sages”, directed in this case against the National Bolsheviks. Nothing of the same in the building of the theater of facial expressions and gestures was pronounced. In addition, the theater was stuffed with riot police and surrounded by crowds of special forces and police.

The European Court, I hope, will enjoy the assessment of this police Galichee and Paranoi. Well, the mode!