Isa Archakov began to investigate the theft of budget funds allocated to the victims of the flood ... and reached the leadership of Ingushetia

And SARCHAKOV, senior investigator of the Sunzhensk district prosecutor's office of Ingushetia, is a man of solid “not”. Unpressive, innocent, incomprehensible, laconic and gloomy. He is very unhealthy, and met me on a bench in the courtyard of the Sunzhenskaya district hospital. From the hassle, which has been going on for more than a year, it has fallen with the heart.
Where did the 52-year-old investigator Archakov invade? What led him to complete discord with the system in which he spent almost his entire professional life?
The "flood" case
Isa Archakov is the same investigator who conducted the case of the embezzlement of “flood” money.
In front of all of Ingushetia, some of its inhabitants suddenly for no reason, new beautiful mansions of high fences grew for no reason - and these people were not affected by floods. Others are still ready to show their blurry and never restored shacks. Of course, no one saw documents on the assignment of “flood” money - this is impossible in the conditions of the current Ingush reality, where the connection between the authorities and the people is absolutely broken. And that means that rumors had every reason to grow stronger and multiply.
“It so happened that for a while I left the prosecutor’s office,” says Isa Magomedsultanovich. - But after the fighters attack on Ingushetia in June 2004, I was asked to return - there were not enough people, things lay for months without movement. When I started work again, they gave me primarily economic affairs - because I was more experienced in this than others. In addition, no one wanted to take these matters.
“This is a mathematical task,” explains Archakov. - The essence of the act was that false lists were compiled on fictional victims. Lists were approved by the government commission. Then they got into the savings bank for payment. A specific controller and a sales cashier signed up for “fictional” money - they were charged with them.
This explanatory was written in February 2005 - when a barrel from the Republican prosecutor’s office rolled on Archakov. Formally, dissatisfaction with the investigator was formed in such a way that he “dug the case” has been working on him for too long. He was reprimanded, later - another, and then "incomplete official correspondence."
By that time, the business of protecting republican officials was transferred into reliable hands. In Ingushetia, a republican prosecutor was replaced. The previous one, Belkharoev, passed the case to Kalimatov, whose candidacy was long and persistently lobbying in Moscow by President Zyazikov. Why did you lobby? After all, Belkharoev was not distinguished by any obstinacy ...
With the advent of Kalimatov, of course, a shake of old affairs and former people began: they began to clean the city and district prosecutors from “not their own”.
“They told me directly: we need to make room,” the investigator replies. - You are “not your own”, from Malgobek, Kalimatov - from Sunzhi. That is, from this area. He has many relatives here, we must attach. Kalimatov takes controlled - illiterate, without a legal framework, without experience, most “for money” graduated from institutes - everyone knows: who is “for money”, who for knowledge.
In addition to him, the Sunzhensk prosecutor’s office was offered to leave “in a good way” Gelanie Merezhuev, the prosecutor of the district, for “lack of proper control over operational employees” (over Archakov), Merzhuev refused, and they also began to poison him. And when the arguments of Meryuyev supported the deputy district prosecutor Ayup Nauruzov, persecution also touched him.
- When they try to intimidate me, I am going to exacerbate. Such a character, ”says investigator Archakov.
"170 claims"
Archakov tried to dismiss, and he tried to challenge every penalty imposed in court. Pedantic, as befits the investigator of the prosecutor's office.
Isa Magomedsultanovich is now a researcher at the work of the Republican prosecutor's office. The researcher is involuntarily. He shows, for example, the order of the prosecutor of the RI No. 142-K “On the procedure for traveling outside the republic of employees of the prosecution authorities of the republic”. This paper is prohibited from the prosecutors of the prosecutor's office even in their free time to leave somewhere from Ingushetia. At all. In order to go to Khasavyurt on Sunday to the famous market, where everyone goes, an employee of the prosecutor’s office must submit a report, indicate the reason (buy gifts to children?), The report will be considered, and in accordance with the imposed resolution it turns out: it will be possible to either go to the market or not ...
A third -party person of Kalimatova may seem only funny. But Archakov did not consider it important to laugh at this strange regulation of people's personal life - he filed a statement with a request to recognize Kalimatov’s order as invalid as unconstitutional on the basis of Art. 27 of the Constitution, guaranteeing Russian citizens, the right to freely move in their free time.
And the investigator persisted: he wrote to Putin, to the State Duma, the Prosecutor Generals about what was happening with the Ingush prosecutor’s office at Kalimatov. Both Ustinov and Chaika.
“... to all the city prosecutors, this is a quote from an order for the prosecutor's office of RI No. 01032 dated 01.27.2006 - ... you need to achieve the results obtained in 2005 in the 5 months of this year, namely: ... to present 180 claims to the courts of general jurisdiction, the prosecutor of the Sunzhensky district and the city of Malgobek for 170 Isching statements, Prosecutor of the Nazran district and the city of Karabulak for 140 claims ... ”
"... Personal responsibility for the implementation of this assignment lies with ...".
The criminals were simply missed, they were negotiated, they lost valuable informants, being busy compiling a pleasant reporting in all respects. On October 20 of last year, for example, in Ingushetia, in the village of Troitskaya, the Sunzhensky district, a certain O. Athuev, assistant deputy of the State Duma V. Cherepkov was stolen. In the territoriality of the fact of the crime, Archakov opened a criminal case, it fell into the control of the Prosecutor General. Over time, Archakov managed to go on the trail of bandits in Chechnya, an informant appeared, who gave a chain, where the abducted could be and who holds it in captivity. As soon as this became known, both the informant and the case were requested by Archakov to the Republican Prosecutor's Office - this is so that they report to the Prosecutor General, not Archakov. But what happened next? In the Republican prosecutor’s office, the chain was safely “buried”, without even interrogating the informant. The reason is the same unprofessionalism of "their". “Their own” is, of course, reliable, but they do not know how to work with informants. And the likely salvation of the hostage collapsed ... Such a struggle against banditry in Ingushetia is doomed to the fact that there will be new victims every day.
At the time of the battles with the Republican prosecutor’s office, Archakov, as a sin, got the case of the illegal detention of a certain Saraliev in the temporary detention of the Sunzhensky regional police department. One fine day, the court decided to release Saraliev, but they suddenly called from the Republican prosecutor’s office and demanded Saraliev in prison. They again called in their own way, as is customary.
- And why was the prosecutor's office of the republic interested not to let Saraliev release? What is the reason?
-Tell me, did you give any results your letters to Putin and the Prosecutor General?
-I think you were offered to leave in a good way?
- Tell me, what happened to the first thing - about the theft of the “flood” money, which, in fact, did your persecution began?
Once, when Putin only came, everyone was so against the principles of life in the North Caucasus: they say, they have not what we have-clan, she devours the law. But gradually it was this type of government that has become an all -Russian tragedy. Why cannot the investigator Archakov, the seeker of Pravda, cannot find understanding in Moscow? Because he writes against "his", including for the Kremlin.
Anna Politkovskaya, observer of "New",
08/31/2006