The dews cannot return the stolen 20% of the shares of "Apatita"

The Federal Property Management Agency cannot yet return the 20% of the Apatite shares, for the theft of which the former head of the Yukos Mikhail Khodorkovsky and the former head of the MFI Menatep Platon Lebedev were convicted. Despite the fact that in February, the court decided to transfer 20% of the shares from Fosagro accounts to the balance of the Federal Property Management Agency, the change of the owner of the disputed asset has not yet been held, reports RBC Daily . Neither in the Federal Property Management Agency, nor in Fosagro can explain why the court decision is still unfulfilled.

For several years, the state has been trying to return the 20% of the shares of the Apatit plant, which in 1994 went to the AOZT Volna, the Menatep control bank. In 1998, the RFFIFISED ABOUT CARAL RETURN OF 20% of Apatita shares, but in 1999, enforcement proceedings had to be terminated, since the company no longer had these shares.

Officials made a new attempt in 2005 after Mikhail Khodorkovsky and others were found guilty of the embezzlement of 20% of Apatite shares. But in November 2006, the Moscow Arbitration Court refused the Federal Property Management Agency . However, having given an appeal, the Federal Property Management Agency achieved what was desired. On February 7 of this year , the court ruled that Fosagro should return the 20% of Apatite shares to state property . At the same time, the court ordered the “Russian investors” depository to write off 20% of the Apatite shares from the Fosagro accounts and enroll them in the account of the Federal Property Management Agency.

Despite the fact that Fosagro had the opportunity to challenge this decision in the Federal Arbitration Court of the Moscow District, according to the information of RBC Daily, the company never did this. Fosagro refused the comments. Meanwhile, as it managed to find out, despite the refusal of Fosagro from the further judicial lawsuit, 20% of the Apatite shares did not submit the Federal Property Management Agency. In the Federal Property Management Agency, they could not comment on the situation with the return of Apatite shares to state property.

The source of RBC Daily, familiar with the course of enforcement proceedings in the case, noted that the bailiffs had difficulties with the implementation of the court decision. "In particular, the court ordered the depository to enroll 20% of the Apatita shares on the personal account of the Federal Property Management Agency, but the depository keeps records of shares in pieces," he says. The “Russian investors” refused comments, citing the confidentiality of information about the movement of shares on client accounts. However, the interlocutor of RBC Daily in the Federal Property Management Agency, familiar with the course of the case, for bailiffs, "this should not become a problem." According to the law, the bailiffs have two months to fulfill the court decision, but in practice this period is delayed.