April duty officers

April duty officers. 90 years ago, one scumbag, marginal and fanatic, urgently rolled from Davos (or maybe from Zurich) to Petrograd. And quickly dashed the "April Theses".

The situation in the country was then cheerful and encouraging: spring, thaw, revolution, restructuring. The “other Russia” was formally in power, that is, the temporary government, people are quite respectable, only naive, enthusiastic and weak, plus the Petrosovet, that is, extremists, right (Socialist -Revolutionaries and Mensheviks) and left (Bolsheviks, anarchists). Guchkov, Milyukov, Prince Lviv are so similar to Harry Kasparov, George Satarov and Mikhail Kasyanov. Kerensky always reminded me of Grigory Yavlinsky. And the Petrosopher, all these, as they were called, “dog and racers” deputies, from whose blessing, the peasants have already shared someone else's land - this is precisely the Limonovites and Akaemovites. Here you have a laboratory lesson: like the allies, together, together went on February days to the “marshmallows of the disagreement”, together the king overthrew, demanding renunciation (“Putin, go yourself”), but a revolution happened, and an extremist program was carried out, up to the murder of officers, frying the alignment and burning of the estates along with their owners. Valeria Novodvorskaya Reds can be pretended to be pigeons, but in fact they remain vultures, and even, being in power, they certainly let the owners of the red rooster. This is about birds. Let us return to the scumbag of Ulyanov: he seemed to consider himself a communist. And 90 years later, a statesman, a vertical -forming etist, is sitting in our Kremlin. But a strange thing! The extremist of Lenin and the Putin sovereign for a number of their April theses (it seems that our guarantor became president seven years ago, in March, so the clock almost coincides) strange coincidences were outlined. One of the first theses of Lenin is his hostility to the "capitalists, the worst enemies of the world and socialism." And what is happening in our "market" state? Gusinsky and Berezovsky was driven-whom for the la-mansh, whom for the Red Sea; The capitalists were declared oligarchs and "Equal"; From the dispossessed "Yukos", several dozen people have already gone to the Gulag; Georgian businessmen have just been robbed under "plausible" pretexts; The business was "built" until completely subordinate to the state and intimidated, as in 1918. True, Abramovich is not touched, but Lenin and Hammer also yaked. The second thesis: hatred of the parliamentary republic. This, they say, is a step back. Lenin is in every possible way to kick parliamentarism. And Putin does not just kick: he finishes him. 7% of the threshold, even in the elections to the founder in 1917, was not. And the abolition of the governor’s elections and the “appointment” in the Federation Council is quite in the spirit of Ilyich, who everywhere sent his commissars (“representatives of the president in ...” Why do not Shirak have them?). Next is the thesis about the "nationalization of the whole earth." Lenin set this task, and Stalin finally decided in the 1930s. Do we have private ownership of land? Like in South Butovo, for example. As in Moscow, where the owner of the company cannot buy land under his building, and he is leased to the building, and not unlimited, but for five years. Yes, and the thesis about the Soviets, no elected, self -assembled deputies, who should belong to all power, only modified. Lenin had the advice of workers and soldiers' deputies. And Putin’s councils have Chekist deputies. And they sit secretly. So it is not for nothing that the Christian Putin Antichrist Lenin continues to lie down in the mausoleum right under the window, and red stars stick out over the Kremlin. These “April duty officers”, the dictator Lenin and President Putin, arrived on a red armored train. Therefore, we will not get anywhere. This is still the "city of Leningrad." In a car off by the history, no need to sit down, expensive scattered Russians.