Brief course of GDP history

Congratulations in the genre of a 20-minute toast were called “55” by analogy with the last Mikhalkovo film “12” and declared “the author’s program of Nikita Mikhalkov”. After the reservation, that, perhaps, “it’s not very clever to say some words in the face”, the author still says, warning them, “I'm not afraid of this at all.”

There is a certain variety of memoirs: "He recalls as if we all have already died." Nikita Mikhalkov suggests: “Let's just conduct an easy tour in those years” and then tells about the 90s - about “the time of dashing robbers”. Although it is not the first time to hear that the previous decade is before our era, before the coming and before Christmas, but each time it takes a dumb: however, nothing, nothing, did nothing from the 90s's success? Nothing if, according to Mikhalkov, Yeltsin has two main acts: the transfer of power to the successor and the exit from the CPSU, and not the resistance of the State Emergency Committee or something else.

If we talk about the poverty of the 90s and be silent about the increase in the gap between the poor and rich in the 2000s, if only in the 90s-the oligarchs, as if in the 2000s they did not become richer at times-this is still the format of “not quite truth”. But when the only legacy of the 90s in the 2000s is Kursk (“This is all that the country has come to,” Mikhalkov concludes), and then in the 2000s there is neither the Nord-Ost, nor Beslan (they are not mentioned at all)-this is the format of “completely different truth”. If, according to Podputinsky time, the author conducts an “easy tour”, then according to Putinsky, you can’t recognize the homeland before.

This, of course, is a screen work, and how and where the text is closed by the "television" - it is really indicative. The Semibankershchina, “when the country was torn to pieces,” put “on knees in front of several people”, illustrates the reception of the oligarchs at Yeltsin. In order to show Gusinsky, you have to “fade” Friedman (they are in the same frame), and Alekperov, Chubais and Bogdanov are next to Khodorkovsky.

Berezovsky is not visible in that shooting, he is glued from another separately, to the words "he is here, only the turfs by the threads." It seems that the TV channel of this person, fighting for Putin, was smashed by Luzhkov and Primakov on his near approaches to the Kremlin, and the journalists of the publishing house of this person prepared his first book with Putin? So, by the time of the release of the “brief course of the history of the CPSU (b)”, Lenin in the hut in the spill was already alone, without an uncomfortable associate of Zinoviev. But not the time of stupid questions: in the next episode, the author is silent - and Putin sits in the Tu -160 to Pathetic music in the pilchskae, shows us a thumb, then aimed bombing is conducted, and then Putin still irons the space on the cruiser. And it is clear: the 90s were destroyed to the ground, and a new chronology began. Therefore, “you can do everything, all your gesheft” dates back to the 90s, and we all remember this, but about the “Baikalfinance group”-a billionaire from the Tverskaya Ryumny, who bought Yuganskneftegaz in the 2000s-we forgot, and we are not noticed by the three special services of the three special services because of the “three whales” now.

Mikhalkov really succeeds deftly: speech flows with a strain, with a fifth. Music from the Mikhalkovsky film “His own among strangers, a stranger among their own” is a little ambiguous, but the whole author’s program goes under the motto “To hell with details”. True, sometimes they begin to sound in a shocus retroactively read chancellers like “on the initiative of the president, the implementation of national projects has begun,” and with the final paragraph “the president is leaving ... this issue solved” clearly hurried. But two compliments to Putin, even by the standards of toast, are nevertheless overwhelmed over the edge.

Mikhalkov talks about the Munich speech - how Putin reported the West: "I felt sweaty palms, I saw people who first heard when they were told: you are a thief." Once again, you re -read the Munich speech - there is a lot of unflattering about the West in it, but Putin does not seem to expose any thieves there. Yes, and mutual construction is the word “rollback” is still not of Anglo -Saxon origin, and whether it is decent to catch Western thieves with our corruption.

And about Putin's “The opportunity in several languages ​​is easy and easy to say your speech” - in vain. Moreover, further to speech in the Reichstag (2001), speech in Guatemala (2007) is glued: well, there are no “several languages”, light and laid -back; Well, Putin’s bad English, and in French, just learned a few phrases. Or is it the calculation of retirement viewers and the fact that the young, almost completely bilingual Russia “box” does not look? For that matter, a much greater merit, which is not easy and not at ease - and the fact that Putin was mobilized to break through the Olympiad did not hesitate his pronunciation; What he is, so on the embrasure and rushed. Even touching. But, you see, the stage of the “most humane person” has already been passed in the modeling of the image, it is also time to make the “linguistic knowledge” from it from the old memory.

And also a trifle: somehow Russia was lost - it turns out, she only waited for her savior. And there was no place for the Russian people in a toast. Of course, you do not hope for some modern passages about business integrated into the world that created new industries and leaving the default, without waiting for the wonderful 2000s. But in general, the people - what, is he not only silent, but also inactive? No, beneficial changes “are associated with his name and his consistent, progressive, creative movement in time and space” - this is not about the people, and it is even strange that in the transcript of toast on the website of the “His” television channel is written with a small letter.

Looking at the absolute confidence of the congratulator, to try to prove anything, which seems to be not in the 21st century of such relations of society and elected power, the country and the head of state. Why, actually? Here they are - there is. This says and shows Moscow, and she does not speak and does not show another about Putin. Society, the country - they are also viewers - they must understand: this is how it is now accepted, it is precisely such relations. And the famous cultural figure as a “style -forming factor” of the era, of course, is the first to set an example, choosing the only true words about how bad it was and how good it became. The verses would have turned out even shorter, especially since they have been written for a long time, you just need to correct it a little:

Through the thunderstorms, the sun of freedom shone to us,

And Putin the Great illuminated our path.

The fourth Mikhalkov version of the state anthem was the first to sound on the author’s performance.