A letter came to the Echo of Moscow - in my name. Having read it, the first thing he specified the referent girls, whether the draw ... But it seems not to be a draw: the coat of arms on the letter, the press on the envelope is all the present. And the correspondent, therefore, is real (even, I would say, specific) - deputy of the State Duma Sergey Abeltsev
This Falcon of Zhirinovsky in recent years has been one of my most reliable customers. Almost every time he opened his mouth, what was said was suitable for the program “Cream Sword”. Sometimes, however, the deputy mat was to “turn out”: being an extremely sincere person, Sergei Nikolaevich did not consider it necessary to filter the bazaar even on the air. The last time I took this surname in my mouth in June this year ...
From the program "Cream cheese" (06/14/2008)
Announcer . The head of the Moscow Helsinki group Lyudmila Alekseeva and the leader of the “For Human Rights” movement Lev Ponomarev were thrown into eggs during a press conference in Moscow, dedicated to torture and killings of prisoners in the Chelyabinsk colony. The attack on human rights activists was arranged by a group of youth under the leadership of the State Duma deputy from the LDPR Sergey Abeltsev.
Shenderovich . Do you imagine the face of deputy Abeltsev? And Lyudmila Mikhailovna Alekseeva? Well, that's it. And how nice it is to know that our legislative power is precisely Abelsev and four and a half hundred of the same Yehu, and not the eighty -year -old marginalist Alekseev, who has neither an icon with a tricolor, nor a machine with a flashing light, nor budget financing ... So, by the way, about our Yehu from the Okhotny series. The Hamian attack on two middle -aged people was built by the Abelsee animal on Tuesday - probably, on Wednesday it was condemned by their ethics commission ... No? Then maybe on Thursday? Well, on Friday - I definitely condemned! No? Not a word? Wow. Herd Yehu. Read the swift, but I have nothing more to add.
And now - the dream of a journalist: feedback, a letter from the State Duma! Of course, it was not Mr. Abeltsev himself, but one of his assistants-the text gravitating to the logoras is densely saturated with a lower back, and the syntax goes far beyond the dimensions of the head of Sergei Nikolaevich (see photo). But if the coat of arms, the seal and signature below are undeniable, then the fate is fate for me to go through mutual correspondence ...
Letter of the deputy Abeltsev to journalist Shenderovich *
Dear Victor Anatolyevich! 06/14/2008 you treated your constant and, apparently, already bored with this not the most exquisite dish, listeners, another “melted cheese”. Apparently, in order to slightly improve the “food” properties and dosage of this product, you decided to refresh its taste, like to “set pepper”, generously sprinkling the texts with jargonisms, interjections, vernacular, thieves and insulting words and words.
To you as a radio journalist, a representative of a special linguistic cultural community, by definition of an extrovert figure of communication, it should be careful, I would say, it would be more careful about verbal forms and the content of your communication. (...)
And how to evaluate your escapades addressed to Russians, unequivocally characterizing our people as alcoholics and unconscious demented, who do not know and do not remember anything? Definitely, as offensive and humiliating, cynical and mocking. Who are you mocking, Shenderovich? Mock Russia and the Russian people. Let's go further. You yourself were attended by the same press conference in Moscow, about which with such confidence and peremptory reasoned during the radio broadcast? You were an eyewitness that “a group of youth under the leadership of the State Duma deputy from the LDPR Sergey Abeltsev” arranged an attack on human rights activists? (...)
A strange reminiscence - the identification of Russian parliamentarians with Yehu - disgusting human -like creatures on which Swift noble horses drove water, and they only did that they were constantly defecate, choosing this action in their only way of communication.
Are you, like Gulliver, were imbued with the awareness of the greatness of the guigangm race and now in people they began to see the terrible Yehu? Taking compassion for every person, I want to warn you, Shenderovich, a reminder that, realizing that horses would never take all power, Swift fell into deep depression and went crazy.
Personally, I, just as a normal person, is in touch from all this. And as a deputy of the State Duma, I consider the definition of Russian parliamentarians you have given the offensive, corrupting public morality, unworthy of the culture of Russian speech and, accordingly, reprehensible, that is, worthy of condemnation and censure. (...)
On what basis and on what right in your speech did you use the following expression: "... the animal of the Abelians ..."? (...) The explanatory dictionary of V. Dahl is as follows to interpret the word "animal" in the abusive sense: "cattle, unworthy of a person’s name." (...)
The so -called wrestlers for democracy in Russia always demanded reprisals against their opponents, which is why deputies of the State Duma became the object of your criticism. Incidentally, not just certain civilians, but people in a state position, the status of which is registered in the Constitution and requires the appropriate attitude of citizens.
You and others can only pour mud on, as this is your genre, give advice, play the role of public triumphs. But turn to you with a request to write something good about your country, to do a specific useful business-you will not be able to. Looked over the years of reforms and complete impunity. (...)
I am not offended by you, Shenderovich. I am offended by you. As they say, feel the difference. You insulted me, committed a speech act of verbal aggression, in which you realized their motive to put communicative pressure on the addressee of the speech, that is, on me. (...)
Russian courts have repeatedly the use of zoosemantic metaphors, including the word “animal”, to emphasize the negative properties of a person, especially in a public speech, qualified as “insult”. (...)
Therefore, returning to the earthly affairs, I want to notify you with the present that I regard the “definition” given to me, as humiliating my honor and dignity. And being also expressed in an indecent form - a criminally punishable act - an insult made public in the media.
This gives me every right to apply to law enforcement agencies with a request to bring you to criminal liability for a crime under Part 2 of Art. 130 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, as well as demand non -pecuniary damage caused to me in the manner of civil proceedings.
I also notify you that I decided to report your actions to the Ministry of Communications and Mass Communications of the Russian Federation and the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation. S. Abeltsev
* In reduction; The letter can be found completely on the official website of the deputy; The grammar and style of the original are preserved.
Letter of journalist Shenderovich to deputy Abeltsev
Dear Sergey Nikolaevich!
The first desire to read your letter was to convey it privately to the collection of my friend, the doctor of the “brainwater” Andrei Biljo, and forget him like a nightmare. But by thinking, I abandoned this frivolous plan, for the subject of our dispute seemed extremely important to me.
Are you, Sergey Nikolaevich?
This item undoubtedly requires the final clarification, but first let me clarify a few questions raised in your letter.
First. I never characterized the Russian people “as alcoholics and unconscious demented, who do not know and do not remember anything” - at least because I do not consider the concept of “people” a unit of measurement. Inside this people there is, for example, Lyudmila Mikhailovna Alekseeva, and there are, for example, you. "As they say, feel the difference." (By the way, tell your referent: “As they say” - is written without a soft sign. Or two “c” after two).
Second. The fact that the organizer of the vile attack on Ms. Alekseeva and Mr. Ponomarev were you were reported in several media-and, mind you, your reputation did not prevent anyone from believing. However, the reputation of the reputation, and there are direct evidence that before that press conference you talked with scum that subsequently attacked.
The third is about culture and morality. This passage in your letter did not surprise me: just gentlemen like you, in the interval between household rudeness and political provocations, they like to be happy about such matters. It would be strange if the deputy seemed to have not rubbed his back against this palm.
Fourth. For comparing Russian parliamentarians with humanoid Yehu, described by the dean of Swift, I am ready to ask for forgiveness, but from Yehu. By common thought, it should be recognized: they are far from as dangerous as deputies of the State Duma of the Russian Federation. According to Dr. Gulliver, Yehu were very aggressive, but they did not steal on especially large sizes, did not look for racketeering and were not involved in custom -made murders, as individual deputies of the State Duma from the LDPR faction. All this makes me regret a careless metaphor.
As for the woeful fate of the dean of Swift, he really was of low opinion of humanity, and this seriously poisoned its existence. Fortunately, Swift did not know before meeting you, Mr. Abeltsev: if he had been shown such a parliamentarian, he would definitely go crazy.
Fifth. Being an adherent of the law, I do not demand reprisals against you - and I do not even propose to lower the flock of “frantic dogs, bl ...”, as you offered on the air of the Echo of Moscow radio and other participants of the “mandatory of disagreements” (see the “mocked cheese” of April 14, 2007). But at least fifteen days, according to the episode with an attack on Alekseev, you would not hurt to sit down.
There, in a temporary detention center, you would finally have a chance to understand that “certain civilian people” cannot be an object of criticism in democratic countries (which you mentioned with poorly hidden contempt) - the institutions and their representatives are primarily for a journalist. And this is not “watering mud”, Sergey Nikolaevich, but public hygiene. If this is not done, it begins to smell bad.
(By the way. The status of a deputy of the State Duma is really spelled out in the Constitution, but not a word is said about the “appropriate attitude of citizens” there, it seems to you. The attitude of citizens must be earned by their work, and you deserve it exactly the corresponding one - this is what is).
And finally, the last and most importantly: about that definition from the Dahl dictionary. I am happy to inform you that on this point I have no discrepancies with Dal. The word "animal" for your brief description I applied in the same meaning you have quoted: "cattle; Unworthy title of man. "
Did I understand you correctly that you do not agree with this? Didn't I misheard? If I did not rush, then I am urgently asking you - do not neglect your right to apply to law enforcement agencies with a request to bring me to criminal liability for the crime under Part 2 of Art. 130 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation! Truth above all. Let's stop smearing white porridge on a clean table, Sergey Nikolaevich, and as soon as possible, in compliance with all formalities, we will begin to study the question of the question of whether the deputy of Abelsev is an animal.
I promise to take the most lively participation in this study.
