In society

Betioner

September 9, 2009 Alexander Ryklin

Honestly - I have not read Izvestia newspaper for a long time. For personal hygiene reasons and because boring to a dentist. But then the colleague threw up the article and urgently recommended that he get acquainted. The article is called “the law, systemic and non -systemic” and belongs to Peru (not, perhaps, is not a feather. You won’t take such a noble instrument ...) a certain Vitali Ivanov. To my question "Who is this?" The colleague shook his head reproachfully: "You are completely behind life - this is the mouthpiece of Vladislav Surkov." I must admit that I really lagged behind their life-at some point all this propaganda crackling and ideological research of the Kremlin children stopped amusing me. And not even because of the fact that their unintelligible revelations are ideologically alien and disgusting, but above all, because these texts are all as one are mediocre, primitive, and besides, they are also written in a language that you can’t even call cloth. In a word, I did not know until now, who Vitaly Ivanov is. He knew about Shevchenko, he knew about Leontiev, but he did not know about this. Yes, and I do not have to know all of them.

But in this case, the appeal to the name of Surkov had its effect-I remember about Surkov. “Effective Political Manager”, well, how, how ... and also the poet, and the playwright, and, as Stas Belkovsky assures, successful, well -sold (although in this case sounds ambiguous) the novelist. In short, I remember Surkov. It was like that. However, why was it? It seems, and now, they say, there is. Although, kill me, I don’t understand why they still keep him? Well, yes, this is another conversation ... back to the text of the faded-eyed (judging by the attached photograph) of the Surkovka, who is also the director of some important institution. (That is, we must think, and a scientific degree is available.)

So, text about hopes. About who should be hoped for what after listening to theses, reading between lines, capturing signals, etc. In other words, the text is frankly clarifying in nature and, given the author’s approximation to high spheres, is exclusively valuable. The main message is formulated in literally a few phrases. “As for the unsystematic opposition of all kinds of radicals from among the liberals-westers, National Excessions,“ Neobolsheviks ”, etc. “Disagted”, then updated Kremlin rules do not apply at all and cannot be distributed. The degree of freedom is expanding inside the system, and not outside it. ”

I will explain - we are talking about the new Kremlin indication, supposedly from the very top: we do not remove the opposition from the elections of opposition.

That is, now it is clear what Medvedev and Surkov talked about - political competition is possible only inside the political system they created. And they, of course, are controlled. Here compete, and here-no, no. Here let's go, then twist. Zyuganov reads the alphabet then to Z, Mironov - from Z to T, Mitrokhin - from T to Y. Well, let the voter decide whose reading to his liking. This is their degree of freedom. Want to bite, gnaw at the bank. Previously, the bank was small, but now we will give you a big one. To make where to turn around for the fun. But we will establish the rules ourselves - Mironov cannot try to bite off the tail of Zyuganov, Zyuganov should not beat Mitrokhin on ... (although what are there ...?) But from the jar not a step. The article ends with a fatherly parting words.

“Many leaders of“ solidarity ”(including those who tried to run for the Moscow City Duma) have repeatedly performed with anti -Russian slogans and calls, participated in the organization of prohibited street actions. They are quite reasonably suspected of obtaining financing from foreign sources (which is not only illegal, but also immoral), etc. Only extreme tolerance of power allows them to continue their activities. However, tolerance for street clowning and marginal journalism in no case means admission to real politics.

Be careful, gentlemen. They didn’t talk about you. ”

Of course, I will not comment on this stream of exhausted by the Kremlin and the paid consciousness. But with the conclusion, perhaps, I agree. Indeed, they said not about us. And do not say anything about us. You’ve better forget about us at all - you will sleep calmer. The time will come - we remind you of ourselves.