Translated material
Triumphal test
In the opposition
Triumphal test
June 12, 2010 Julia Galyamina
Already 10 days have passed since the last rally of disagreements, and he still remains an event that is customary among journalists to be called an info -capacity. Truly, triumphal became the most popular area not only of Moscow, but throughout Russia. The “triumphal of the 31st” has finally turned into a political chronotope-which, in fact, the initiators of the “strategy-31” achieved and what the authorities were so afraid of. Therefore, for the latter today the most important task is the destruction of this particular tragic unity of place and time. Initially, the Moscow (and most likely, not only) bosses had the thoughts of playing not with the signing symbol (the triumphal of the 31st), but its meaning (i.e., with an event with which the symbol is associated). The Mountbaykov show, from which the authorities started, from the very beginning some miserable looked, and pompous actions for the collection of blood were replaced (no matter what, the sense of humor is specific in power). However, the latest events showed that, no matter how you try, the donor actions become an information event only as a surroundings for the promotion of disagreements, for example, sometimes they go for a quite worthy soundtrack for mass Vincelov.So the only means of destroying the triumphal 31st as a symbol inevitably becomes the struggle not with the meaning, but with the external, visible side of the sign. To make a symbol and chronotope from Pushkinskaya-31 or Bolotnaya-31 for at least another year, if this task is solved (you cannot enter into different areas). It is precisely this that the proposal for the moratorium on holding political actions on the triumphal, published by the editor -in -chief of Echo of Moscow, Alexei Venediktov, is aimed at. He was guided by secretly with these motives or the reasons for his act are fully consistent with what he said, in essence, does not matter: in any case, this idea is extremely beneficial - it successfully destroys the chronotope.
In addition, it is generally not clear what Venediktov said exactly at the Council of the Central Internal Affairs Directorate: different eyewitnesses give different testimonies on this subject. It is worth recalling that the first news about this appeared on June 8 at 13:33 in Interfax with reference to an anonymous source. However, at 14:51 the same Interfax gave out the second news, in which Venediktov, uttered at the meeting, described in great detail. In general, it coincides with the fact that about an hour later he said on the air of his native radio station. But then Lyudmila Alekseeva, in her blog, says that at the Venediktov meeting, something else said ... Either Interfax correctly described what Venediktov said, and then Alekseeva misunderstood everything, either Lyudmila Mikhailovna began, and Venediktov began to interpret his own words differently after the meeting, i.e. Following the Interfax, it remains a mystery, but we know exactly who is beneficial to make the interpretation that appeared.
Indeed, in essence, it does not matter at all, it will prohibit the power to gather on the Mayakovka for everyone, all-all or only disagreed: the latter are gathered and gathering, they will not be surprised to put them, to put it mildly. But the Prochrevskaya youth will suffer, because for the most part they go to stocks not at the call of the heart, but for specific bonuses (which is why Venediktov’s proposal caused them a protest). It is also important that the news with Venediktov has become another link in the uninhabited information chain created and inspired by no means disagreed. During the sunset of classic “marshmallows of disagreements”, as in the period of the “Strategy-31” origin, creating a rich information field around the shares was a rather difficult task, which laid down on the shoulders of the press services of various opposition organizations. Today, these efforts are practically not needed: the triumphal sounds in news feeds and so. Now, not everyone remembers that a year ago, the idea of “strategy-31” supported very few people, and even about the presence of VIPs on promotions could only be dreamed of. Then the 200 disagreements that came out to the square seemed a bunch of desperate daredevils, whose courage came to fix almost more journalists, and there is no need to say about 2000 armed people: it was scary. Today, 2000 riot police and police against approximately the same number of protesters seem to have a parity force, if, of course, to consider the triumphal as a symbolic (and sometimes not very) battle. Now, in order to achieve the same effect as a year ago, the authorities must be brought to the lighthouse of 20 thousand policemen, which, in general, is poorly. Now, according to many participants, it is not scary to go out, but fun (contrary to all the atrocities of the police).
This time, those who were surprising there, for example, Vladimir Ryzhkov, Irina Yasina, Boris Nadezhdin, went to the square ... The most important achievement of Strategy-31 can be considered that she was supported by deceived equity holders and motorists, whose politically painted protest potential did not believe most representatives of an irreconcilable opposition. Moreover, it became disagreed even in the glamorous environment: Katya Gordon supported the action and promised to visit Svetlana Bondarchuk.
But the most amazing was the participation in the PR of the action of Vladimir Putin. Moreover, twice over the past from the 31st ten days, he gave new information reasons to mention the triumphal. And what is curious - in this powerful information stream around the triumphal, Dmitry Medvedev is not visible at all.
The popularization of the triumphant is also facilitated by stories from the category of lawlessness: Artemyev’s broken hand and convicted for two and a half years accidentally passing through the Mayakovka on New Year's Eve, a decent person (this is a truly irony of fate). The guards are trying to blame in this regard that disagreements in PR on the blood. So, as if the Inquisition (well, or sympathetic to her for a fee) accused Jeanne d'Arc in self -patient at the stake.
We see how the triumphal for many for many forced to change the style, opinion, behavior, and sometimes fate - as if new reality diverges from it in circles. But of course, the situation is not quite like that: the triumphal is not a reason, it is a consequence. Therefore, the struggle is at least with the designated, at least with the triumphal in any case, doomed to failure. Something changed in the Danish kingdom, in the air smelled of ozone.