
Of course, I do not study the Internet too carefully and very rarely watch TV, but this time I especially striking. The next anniversary of the events of August, 91st was somehow very modest, from the point of view of the attention of the media. In general, it seems that it began to remember this ... somehow it is not too convenient or something. As they say, the tops cannot and do not want, and the bottoms are not up to that.
The current leadership of the country is quite difficult to come up with a “competent” explanation for what happened 19 years ago. It does not fit into the momentary canons and can hardly serve the case of further "arranging" of our life. And the people ... And what about the people? And what is the people now? From the "folk" point of view, everything that does not bring enough of a specific dough in a specific pocket at a given particular moment in time does not deserve a good word. It is enough to study the results of the population surveys. Putch-1991 is just an "episode of the struggle for power in the top leadership of the country."
Both of the output lying on the surface are characteristic. Firstly, our people traditionally suffer from underestimated self-esteem-after all, it was a damn thing, almost the first in many years (well, for example, from the Novocherkassky events of 1962) a real public and, moreover, a successful action on the history of the country! And secondly, the people do not associate themselves with the “servants of the people”. Flies do not pretend to the cutlets and try to stay away from them. And a similar alignment, in my opinion, is the most successful (moreover almost the only one!) The project of our native state. So to concentrate people on the problem of extracting funds to food that there are no other strength or interests to anything else.
The recipe, of course, is not new, it is 150 years old, but the effect is quite effective and has a rather long one - for all the time, until the productivity of labor is growing and the average standard of living increases by bit. In Russia, both process are even more leisurely than anywhere else, so that the calm and well -fed life of the current elite of the state is ensured.
Among the decent people, talking about politics became Moveton. It is understandable - about the deceased either nothing or good. But if you ask me, then, by golly, the political carnival of the 90s turned out to be much more interesting, and most importantly (and the funniest!)-more honest than the current vertical bony before our eyes. Another thing is that the carnival is also boring in large quantities, but if you arrange it once every 4 years, it seems like it is tolerant.
And from the “policy” that we have now, I really want to stay away. Both out of a sense of natural disgust, and for considerations of elementary safety: so much gas and oil was lowered to the left, their hands were warmed so well on mobile communications, so successfully attached a number of military-strategic developments behind the hill that the persons are always found for hanging. True or imaginary is another question. Here, the “principle of reversibility of truth” invented by one of the modern popular writers will work perfectly.
Now I don’t even know how to “equip Russia”. That is, a successful practice based on fairly extended methods is tested all over the world. But for some reason, the same methods used in their native penalties give completely unpredictable results. More precisely, the result is always the same: "They wanted the best." Which, however, is not surprising for the kingdom of crooked mirrors. Sorry! "Republics of crooked mirrors."
Ilya Mirmov