The household is such ...

About ordinary murder and ordinary investigation

Sasha was killed from 14.30 to 5 a.m. In the apartment of former friends with whom he grew up and that they lived with him in the same entrance. They killed in the kitchen. With interruptions - the owners ate and drank, called friends to come to participate in the executions, meet ...

Sasha was killed from 14.30 to 5 a.m. In the apartment of former friends with whom he grew up and that they lived with him in the same entrance. They killed in the kitchen. With interruptions - the owners ate and drank, called friends, so that they came to participate in the executions, meet and receive guests, go to bed, returned back - swallow the water ... And the guests also came, drank, looked ...

Sasha was beaten with their hands and feet, jumped over the chest and head. All the ribs are broken, internal organs, cerebral edema, seven dozen hematomas are broken ...

No one - neither the owners nor the guests - caused an ambulance when Sasha wheezed, and blood went from his throat, no one caused an ambulance when he fell silent. Doctors, nevertheless caused by about 6 in the morning, could only state death to Sashin.

And the hosts sat down to drink - waiting for the police, they didn’t take anything in the apartment - they didn’t even wiped the blood, gave conference, sat at interrogation and were released. Like witnesses. Now they live calmly in the same apartment, sometimes meeting in an elevator with relatives of the murdered Sasha.

However, the murders, as they believe in the investigation department under the prosecutor's office of the Cheremushkinsky district of Moscow, was also not - neither ordinary nor with particular cruelty. A crime, in which only one of the guests of this crazy party is suspected is the infliction of serious bodily harm that caused death by negligence. Well, inadvertently jumped on the head - what is not clear?

Such a common situation, which is called the dull word "household".

... Sasha was 27. To his killers - so. The painful story of their relationship is a mystery even for Sasha’s relatives: no one can understand how people suddenly turned into a threat to life from school friends. And Sasha felt this threat: recently he did not want to communicate with them, changed his phone, approaching the house, asked friends to lead to the door, said: “If this trinity is gathered together, I can’t live” (all this is in the interrogations of witnesses, which, however, were reluctant to be interrogated). But it was on that day that he came across him on the stairwell.

What happened next - they grew up from drugs? No, it is known for sure: there are no impurities of “dope” here. There is vodka, but, as the examination showed, the dose of the adopted was not excessive.

And therefore, the motives of the murder are represented by some monstrous mystery-gloomy, animal. Here are the testimony: they beat, I hit the head, called my friends to help with beating, came alone with the girl, looked, did not help and left. Or: Well, wheezed, they thought that he was snoring, stepped, went to the kitchen ... But they beat for what? “I spoke about someone wrong,” they explain. But somehow inexplicable.

Maybe it was worth spending time on psychological surveys to determine the genesis of ordinary Russian everyday life. However, not to that. Determine the genesis of an ordinary Russian investigation. Therefore - only facts.

The owners of the apartment, the wife of Krivova, were detained at the scene of the crime who arrived on the call of ambulance police officers. Detained with their guest, twice convicted by Famel. At the scene of the crime, they admitted: yes, they beat - about which there is a report of the operative. The first to let go of Krivov-she did not seem to be beaten, but they somehow did not guess her complicity or left her in danger ... Then, in the evening, without even waiting for 48 hours allowed to detain before the charge, they released Krivov.

Why? This question is now the main one for Sasha’s relatives. Why, if the nature of the injuries testifies: several people participated in the beating? Why, if the conclusion of doctors unequivocally indicates that both Krivov’s and Baryaev has the same fingers bruises - repulsed about Sasha? Why, if it was the owner of the apartment of Krivov who phoned acquaintances and invited him to have fun? Why, if death occurred at a time when Baryaev was no longer in the apartment?

And here is the most important point: according to the examination, "all the damage formed-lifetime, formed in a short period of time, one after another, no more than 1-3 hours before death." That is, if the death of Alexander Elfimov occurred at 5.45, then the main injuries were inflicted no earlier than 2.45 and no later than 4.45 in the morning.

Compare these numbers with the surveillance chamber set at the entrance to the entrance, according to which Baryaev left at 20.48 and returned to the Krivovs apartment at 5.47. There are witnesses that they assure: at night the only accused was at home. What could be checked by watching the recordings of the cameras of the Baryaevsky entrance, only the investigation was to do this. And the printout of Baryev’s telephone connections (no one was interested in Krivskaya) confirms his testimony: in the morning he called Krivov, asked to come to help Sasha, “who is bad,” he essentially called to the crime scene to substitute. After all, it was Baryaev in the end that he scored 03, and not at all crooked, in front of which Sasha died.

That is, yes, Baryaev is a bastard, he beat a defenseless person, but was already finished off without him. And, of course, Baryev, as an accomplice of the murder, should sit down for a long time, but why is one and what is the role of the rest? This was just to find out and did not: even for examination they took only Baryaev's clothes.

Sasha’s relatives were indignant and wrote a motion to bring the owners of the apartment accountable. Investigator Kolyagin refused: with respect to Krivov and Krivova, “not to carry out criminal prosecution”. Investigator Kolyagin generally somehow disliked the victims: Hamil to his father, dropped the phone when his sister tried to find out the fate of his complaints, and to the question "Why did the Krivovs did not cause an ambulance?" He answered very convincingly: then they didn’t want to, and in general, are you too smart?

And then a second forensic examination was appointed. The meaning of which, according to the victims, is to “pull up” the time of strike that became fatal, by the time Baryev was still in the apartment.

However, the time of death is an objective given that cannot be faked. And Sasha’s father, a medical scientist, is trying to explain this to the investigation in multi-page petitions, bringing to confirmation of extracts from monographs, complex graphs and forced to say about his own son something like this: “rectal measurement of the corpse temperature”. Wasted.

The investigation was completed, having only one accused in the dry remnant, and if not for the numerous complaints of the victims, then this summer the case would go to court. However, the prosecutor of the Cheremushkinsky district still did not sign the indictment, sending materials for the investigation.

It was supposed to end on August 22. It ended or not, it is not known, the victims are not reported. They only muttered on the phone: the investigator changed. However, the new one, Mr. Kasatkin, when he finally called him, recommended that his relatives of the murdered not to bother him by trifles, and as for the petitions, so you wrote their former to the investigator, why are you pestering me then?

We also tried to pester to answer all those questions that are formulated by reading the case file. The investigation did not want to answer (referring to the secret of the investigation). Maybe the truth in this story is some kind of secret? However, it seems very banal.

Instead of a commentary, the investigator Kasatkin refused to answer the editorial questions, motivating this with care of the relatives of the murdered Sasha. It was said approximately the following: why do you need it; This is not interesting to anyone; What is the difference to you; Let's talk when we transfer the case to court.d. TO.

Comments

Lawyers Irina Zhukova, Irina Ratnikova:

- Presenting the interests of the victims in this case, we were faced with the problem, from the point of view of the law of inexplicable. According to the law, both the investigator and the victim are participants in the criminal proceedings acting on the side of the prosecution. And as participants in one side have the same goals and objectives. But for some reason not on this matter. The victims constantly come across a blank defense of the investigation, and their rights provided for by the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation are constantly violated.

After two months of investigation of the criminal case, the investigation considered that all evidence was collected and the case can be sent to the court. For familiarization, the case file was presented in an unenlightened and uninhabited form. And from the materials of the case, in particular the conclusion of a forensic expert, it followed that Alexander’s death came from the blows inflicted on him at a time when the accused was no longer in the apartment where the murder occurred.

After getting acquainted with the materials of the case, it was the victims who indicated the shortcomings of the investigation, to witnesses who claimed involvement in the murder of other persons, but all this caused a completely unexpected reaction-the investigator on his own initiative appointed a second forensic examination, which the expert conducted based on the materials of the criminal case.

It seems that the investigation has long been clear: the only guilty is established, he is involved in the quality of the accused, and the investigation simply does not hear the claims of the victims of the murder of another person. After familiarizing the victims with the conclusion of a second examination, which actually confirmed participation in the murder of another person, the investigation ceased to comply with the norms of the Code of Criminal Procedure in relation to the victims. Today, as we know from the words of the investigator, a third examination is being conducted - and again with a violation of the rights of the victims. The victims were not familiarized with the decision on the appointment of the examination, they could not exercise their rights - to declare the discharge to the expert, to raise additional questions.

The state endowed the investigation with power and a procedural mechanism designed to protect the rights of victims. However, there is the fact that the relatives of the murdered are forced to rely only on themselves and the help of lawyers. And if it were not for their numerous complaints about the work of the investigation, then the case would be most likely considered by the court. In the meantime, we have the hope that after the third forensic medical examination, the person from whose blows the death of Alexander came to criminal liability.