Daily Journal:

We agreed that I go to these meetings as a representative of Solidarity. We reached such an agreement back in August within the framework of the organizing committee that was involved in transforming Solidarity into a party. Until now there has been no talk about the creation of some new organizational form. Accordingly, when and if necessary, we will make decisions with our collective bodies, as it should be. So far, I was present first as an observer, now we will see what form we can afford. This is a platform for dialogue. In principle, if we do not concentrate on formal issues, but talk about the content of this process, then I believe that this is useful from the point of view of interaction, exchange of experience on the issue of registration or non-registration (rather non-registration, I think). Practical example: let's say someone gets rejected, and it would be reasonable for all representatives of other organizations to coordinate and protest about this. There are probably some reasonable demands regarding changes to the law on the registration of political parties - it would be good to develop a consolidated position of all organizations - left, right, democratic, whatever - in this direction this is a very specific and quite useful subject for interaction.

After the creation of a democratic coalition was announced, I had no official contact with the meeting participants. It would be reasonable and logical for coalition participants to participate in this dialogue. Basically, they are aware.