Hitler quote

Radio Komsomolskaya Pravda called me a live broadcast. Topic: Appointment of the mayor. I sit and listen to how the presenter pushes the idea: they say, it’s not entirely right that the list of future candidates is “United Russia”. Why not make it Muscovites themselves? Let them draw up a list on the referendum, and the president will then choose from the list.
And the presenter asks me what is better: to appoint or choose.
“Well, how can I tell you,” I say, “in general in decent countries, in London, Paris, in New York, mayors are chosen.” And in some Papuasia they are appointed. For me, better as in a decent country.
- And what is bad such a method? - says the host. - Muscovites put forward candidates and hold a referendum, and already from the list of persons approved by a referendum, the Kremlin chooses the mayor.
- And what is the bad way to tear the tonses through the ass? - I answer impolite.
- And I have other data! - says the host. -I have evidence that as a result of elections to power, a person who is set by one party, and not thinking about the good of the people, often comes to power!
-Yes, yes, I say, this is a well-known idea. In the book "Mine Campf" it is also stated. Which, they say, as a result of rotten democracy and the parliamentary talk in power, representatives of an evil clique are not thinking about the good of the people.
-Uh! - says the host, - We will not allow us to quote extremist literature on our air.
“So it’s not me quoted, but you,” I object, “you said that you should decide the fate of the nation, which has not rotted democracy, but a leader who was aware of the good of the people.
Then the third voice intervened in the conversation.
- Ah! GKHM! Eh! Thank you for your participation! - And the connection was interrupted.
Why?