The best half

We present a comment by Ivan Dudenkov, a researcher at the Institute of Metallurgy and Material Studies named after A. A. Baykova, to the article “Once again about homeopathy and about water memory” (No. 67, p. 9.11), the initial published on the website of the Trav-hunger www.trv- science .ru/2010/11/23/Eshhe-Raz-gomeopatii-io-Pamyati-Vodyy
Among the arguments I read at different times, for some reason, one of the most important is undeservedly forgotten against homeopathy. It is always implied that when pouring half of the contents of the flask into another, with ennced dilution, the remainder of the substance, which was originally in the solution, is divided between them in half. The one who implies this, thereby makes it clear that he did not teach or did not study the colloidal chemistry at all. Many substances or mixtures used for homeopathic purposes consist of large molecules that often have significant adsorption energy on the walls of blood vessels-both with the direct formation of hydrogen ties with their hydrophilic areas with the end of the glass surface, and with the sections of this surface, hydrophobmed surfactants and other polyfunctional substances, adsorbed into the course of previous work with these vessels. In colloidal chemistry courses, at least one lesson is dedicated to the study of desorption kinetics, which can be very non -construction for such large molecules, in addition, the thickness of the adsorbed layer for large molecules is larger, and therefore all the effects are more noticeable.
Thus, starting with some in order of the dilution number (and the more molecules, the earlier it happens), in the source flask and in the flask, into which half is poured, the amount of substance under consideration is different - the increasing and large share begins to remain in the original, until it almost ceases to change, moving from the steep exponential law of descending to very gentle and therefore almost linear. This creates a lot of capabilities for systematic mistakes of too self -confident people with poor education, and for completely conscious dexterity of the hands, which allows you to achieve a tangible medical effect where it seems to be not there, according to all the laws of physics, it should not be.
As for the placebo effect, let those real doctors do this, who should do this in their profile, that is, psychotherapists. In psychotherapy, a scientifically reasonable idea of what disorders are applicable for a long time has been applicable, and under which it is acceptable only as auxiliary, mainly to combat the stress of the patient and his physiological consequences. And homeopaths who do not want to go to the psychotherapy system with the adoption of its rules should be recognized by fraudsters who use the conscious deception of consumers regarding the essence of the “services” they provide, with the imputation of an additional liability in those cases when because of them (due to their recommendations or even just because of the expenses of time and means that could be spent rationally) specialized medical care was not Provided on time.
The secret of "business in the galaxy" is discovered
In the previous issue of the TRV-hobby, the article “Business and the Law in the Galaxy” was published, which paid attention to a very widely erudite company called LLC “Business and Law”. This company concluded several amazing contracts with the Federal Education Agency. Among them are “conducting search research work in the direction of“ astronomy, astrophysicism and space space ”, on the problem of“ dynamics of relativistic bending discs ”, the contract price is 1,500,000 rubles.
After the newspaper was released at the Scientific.ru forum , a kind of open letter of the employee of the Astrophysical Center Fian, Dokt. physical. sciences Pavel Ivanov. We reproduce it entirely with the permission of the author.
I want to clarify some things mentioned in the article “Business and the right in the Galaxy”, published in the last issue of the TRV (No. 67, 2010, p. 6). It stated that a certain business and law LLC won a grant of the Ministry of Education and Science in the amount of 1,500,000 rubles. on the topic "Dynamics of relativistic bending accretion discs." This topic is mine, and in general in the world, except me and co -authors, only a few Americans are engaged in this topic. Therefore, after reading this article, I conducted some internal investigation. It turned out this: some time ago, to my co -author, a young sensible guy, a certain friend working in this LLC, offered to submit a grant from their office and said that they would pay 150,000 rubles, that is, 10 times less. At that moment, he did not know that in reality the amount of grant was 10 times more. This money really comes to him, he does not feel offended, but henceforth, for obvious reasons, will be provided from such proposals. Where the remaining 90%go, we don’t know: maybe to support the hospice for homeless mice, maybe more. Morality is this: I want to inform people by what rules these are LLCs and the structures like him play, and then everyone decides for himself, to contact them or not.
In a private conversation, Pavel Ivanov additionally clarified the following points:
1) The fact that his co -author receives a grant from a certain LLC was already known to him for about two months, since he was referred to in his work that was sent to print in the Monthly Notices of Royal Astronomical Society. However, the fact that this grant was filed exclusively on the topic of it and the co -author of the research was clear after the note in the Trv.
2) Pavel Ivanov has no complaints against his co -response and believes that he acted quite correctly, since he was not in advance about the amount of the grant.
It seems that at present it is a very common way to “cut” budget money. Of course, there are probably performers who are ready to work for pennies ... Meanwhile, officials say that there is enough money for science. This is how it stands out.
Antinormanism as a diagnosis
We publish a reduced version of the replica of Leo Klein, dedicated to the review of his article in the Varangians, antinormanists and hour of truth, (No. 63,2010, p.10)
On the Internet there was a large opus of V.V. Fomin “Klein as a diagnosis, or naked“ horseman ”of Normanism.” This is the answer to my small article in the Trinity version - "Varangians, antinormanists and hour of truth." The answer is more strict than the newspaper article itself by more than ten times - by 101 pages of the book text. The fact is that, under the guise of an interview about this article, it contains a review of my book “The Spore about the Varangians” (2009) with excursions to my other works (“Diagnosis”, “It is difficult to be glue”), as well as to the open letter of nineteen scientists about the conference “The Beginning of the Russian World”.
The whole performance of V.V. Fomin is imbued with the idea of combating hostile teaching - Normanism - which I am for Fomin a visual representative. At one time, I was also forced to write about Normanism, although I realized that there was no normalism. Now we can admit it openly. Antinormanists proclaim that Normanism is a certain teaching, "Norman theory." In fact, there is no such theory. There are hypotheses about the ethnic identification of the Varangians, about one degree or another of the participation of Scandinavians in the ancient history of our country, etc. But not all hypotheses in case of confirmation become theories, many become not theories, but with facts. The hypotheses of the Varangians belong to this last category of hypotheses. The dispute is about facts. Therefore, in the case of confirmation, no “iz” is formed.
As for antinormanism, it has existed in reality for more than two hundred years. But it exists only in Russia and nowhere else in the world. Although the invasions of the Scandinavians were all over Europe and even outside it. Therefore, there is every reason to believe that antinormanism is not a scientific course, but an ideological tendency introduced into science for considerations that are represented as patriotic. Remove the terms “Normanism” and “antinormanism” from the discussion - and immediately disputes will lose their fervor, and in many cases the meaning.
Full version of the article
"Antinormanism as a diagnosis"
Published on the website "Polit.ru"
www.polit.ru/science/2010/12/03/klejn_antinormanism.html