Polonium-210 surfaced again

Our world lives in a stream of news, which have mainly one dimension - the present. If we are not explained by the reasons for what is happening right now, then the next day the time will already be missed. The news has no memory-they are like one-day butterfly.

WikiLeaks is good because it makes it possible to go back. The proof of that was the 2006 dispatch, which tells how two weeks after the murder of Alexander Litvinenko, on December 7, 2006, the special representative of Russia Anatoly Safonov, dinner in Paris with the ambassador Henry Krampton, said that Russian intelligence had observed the persons who moved radioactive materials to London.

The lies are good because those who lie at different times lie differently.

Among the comments that this news gave rise to the simplest. The Russian special services watched the persons who moved the polonies along London. According to the English police, these were Andrei Lugovoi and Dmitry Kovtun. If the Russian intelligence agencies watched them, then why is Andrei Lugova now a State Duma deputy?

And if the British lied and polonium drove someone else, then why did the Russian General Prosecutor's Office not presented evidence that the Polonius was driving another person? Which Russia was watching.

According to the misinformation, thrown by Safonov, we can restore the entire alleged course of the operation of Litvinenko’s poisoning - this is how his appearance can be restored along the dinosaur tooth.

Suppose that Andrei Lugovoi, a former employee of the special services and the former head of the security service belonging to the Berezovsky ORT, was really rejected by his current colleagues for this operation. When he was recruited, it’s hard to say. Maybe back in 2001, when he participated in a frank provocation - the failed “escape” of the partner of Berezovsky Nikolai Glushkov. Maybe later, when, at the request of Litvinenko, he transported abroad some incriminating evidence to a senior Russian official (and such rumors went).

Suppose that the Napoleonic plans of the Russian special services were not at all limited to Alexander Litvinenko. Suppose that Boris Berezovsky and Ahmed Zakayev were to be victims of the same mysterious poisoning. At the same time, the plan was simple. If the English doctors cannot be found out, then it is necessary to instill horror in the hearts of enemies inexplicable and inevitable deaths.

And if the traces of Polonia are discovered, then the message will follow that Zakayev, Litvinenko and Berezovsky, with the help of his accomplice, Andrei Lugovoi were engaged in the manufacture of a “dirt bomb” for Chechen separatists, and the results of the monitoring of Russian special services in London for Andrei Lugov and the posthumous recognition of the meadow will present.

Suppose that Andrei Lugovoi, who was in this game at the same time as a traitor, a double agent, and an executioner, and a victim, easily predicted the development of events. He did not smile at all the author of the “posthumous letter”.

Realizing that what, the day after the death of Litvinenko, November 24, 2006, Andrei Lugovoi gave an interview “Times”, and then rushed to “Echo of Moscow” and other media. It became completely impossible to eliminate it under such circumstances.

I had to make a good mine in a bad game: to elect a meadow to parliament, to listen to his endless press conferences about Berezovsky, recruited by British intelligence, etc. And as a reminder of the previous plan-to blame Berezovsky, Zakayev, Litvinenko and Lugovoi of the smuggling of nuclear materials-there was an Anatoly Safronov’s statement that Russian intelligence monitored the persons who moved the persons who moved the persons who moved the persons Radioactive materials on London, even before the death of Litvinenko.