
Of course, this will be an amazing process - if Danilkin sues his assistant Natalya Vasiliev. If, as Viktor Nikolaevich himself put it, he will try to “defend his honor and a good name in the manner prescribed by law. If, considering himself offended, he will require refutations of the information defaming him.
At least this process will be almost the most paradoxical of all that we had to observe.
I will explain on a simple example. Suppose the defendant Khodorkovsky in the Khamovniki court chaired by Danilkin (the names and name are fictitious by the author) is accused of not stole a drop of oil in the Yukos entrusted to him. The orderly -bearing prosecutor Shokhin violently proves the presence of a crime in his speeches: he did not steal. Lawyers stubbornly defend the client, affirming the opposite. Since in this new, invented reality they are punished not for theft, but for honesty. Stole - free. He did not steal - 14 years, well, such laws.
Until yesterday, Danilkin had a very definite reputation. In the eyes of many Russians - both those who considered them a mockery of justice, and those who believed, after Zhelov and Putin, that "the thief should sit in prison," and those who are all before the lantern, Viktor Nikolaevich looked indifferent and rather insignificant. A screw and a shopentik of the judicial machine. In general, a typical such federal judge, capable of passing and swallowing words in a few days, read that monstrous verdict, according to which even the testimonies of witnesses in defense of Khodorkovsky-Lebedev turned against the defendants.
However, the young woman, who performed in the program of the Rain and Gazeta.ru television channel, drew a completely different portrait of her boss. A shallow, sometimes even a brave and kind person. Strongly worried and carefully choosing the words, Natalya Vasilieva told us what pressure on the part of the leadership withstand and could not stand this glorious judge. About how much in his office it smelled of Corvalol. And about how he was broken.
If the process "Danilkin v. Vasilyeva" will take place, then we have a completely unprecedented spectacle. Smart, brave and kind will prove that he is stupid, timid and angry. Objecting to him, the assistant with concrete examples will again testify his sympathy and sorrowful bewilderment: they say, how does it so, Viktor Nikolaevich, you are a compassionate, pretty, good ... And he, constantly clutching his head, will say the exact opposite: what healthy, bad and evil he is.
Therefore, probably, there will be no court. The most paradoxical of the processes will hardly take place. The assistant will be fired quietly, and after her after a while - and Danilkin himself, as she predicted. For the fact that he did a bad job with his role and launched work with personnel. Although, it is possible, this scenario seems to be the most vile, an attempt will be made to intimidate Natalya Vasiliev, and it is easy to guess what line of behavior she will be advised to choose. In any case, the head of the press service of the Moscow City Court Anna Usacheva is already sure that Natalia "will still refuse her comments, such cases have been."
She must have in mind Sergeant Charukhin, whom the defendant Yashin was frightened by the Bible and the Criminal Code, and then the generals have long groaned the content of these harmful books from him. However, the sergeant’s repeated phenomenon was so eloquent that the authorities probably boiled from the production of such performances. So, I want to believe that the judicial judges will lag behind and her testimony will be made only in history, which is happening before our eyes in a wide variety of genres. Including a tragicomedy called "Danilkin, be a man!"
And this play, in my opinion, is far from the end. It is clear that the witness Natalya Vasilieva is telling the truth, and Viktor Nikolaevich consistently denigrates himself. And when he gets tired of this occupation, he will speak out. Enriching sincerely, softening guilt and good right before our eyes.