
In the Twitter microblog, a scandal broke out between businessman Mikhail Dvorkovich , brother of the assistant President Arkady Dvorkovich, and a lawyer and public figure, top blogger Alexei Navalny , whom the entrepreneur accused of slander and extremism. The discussion in the microblog began after the deputy’s shame from the party of the authorities, the chairman of the State Duma Committee on Economic Policy Yevgeny Fedorov, who volunteered to participate in a duel with a bulk on the FM Finams.
Recall that Alexei Navalny, who called the United Russia a party of crooks and thieves, came to a duel to protect his position, and, judging by the results of the vote, he succeeded. The deputy insisted that the activities of Navalny were paid by the US government and is aimed at destabilizing the situation in Russia, as well as thousands of bloggers provoke the country to riot.
Mikhail Dvorkovich decided to intercede for Fedorov, asking Navalny a question: "You will be actively financed by the US intelligence services? I know Fedorov for 10 years and can answer for his honesty, and what have you done for Russia?"
It is worth noting that this discussion in the Dvorkovich microblog took a huge place and became almost the main topic. In his opinion, "they (Navalny and Fedorov) spoke simply in different languages. Navalny - a lawyer working for grandmas!" The success of Navalny, for which 99% of the listeners voted, Dvorkovich explained this: "Naval professional lawyer! He will prove that the hedgehog is a person!" However, he calls not to take this defeat seriously: "He lost in a banal chatter, and @navalny will lose in life if he does not move from words to business."
He accused the blogger of living at the expense of public opinion. According to him, the United States intervenes in the internal affairs of Russia through the activities of Navalny. He also claims that Navalny indicated the incorrect data on Fedorov's property, provoking the audience. "@navalny slandered Fedorov. And about 5 apartments - this is a lie. And the house is a collapse for 300 thousand rubles and" Mercedes "2004!"
As it turned out, the brother of Arkady Dvorkovich is also sure that there is nothing special in Mercedes, because "such a half -tank." And out of 5 apartments there are only two of it, later added Dvorkovich. As a result, he stated that he wanted to hear from Navalny's apology to Fedorov. "Fedorov, as a decent person, will not sue Navalny for slander, and I will make Navalny publicly apologize!" he writes.
However, the most loud statement sounded later. "Navalny ordinary high -paid extremist ... Do you have something to object, Alexey?" - Mikhail Dvorkovich wrote after several days of discussion, and then added: "I am an honest person and citizen of Russia! And you are a banal extremist! Taking money for the fight against corruption, you go down below the thieves !!!"
In response to this, Navalny politely asked: "And you, sorry, who?" Then Dvorkovich suggested "talking about your fight against corruption for grandmas" on the air of the Echo of Moscow or "Russian News Service".
However, the blogger abandoned this venture. He called Dvorkovich "suffering from a lack of fame" by the brother of the president’s assistant and compared him to the Labrador of Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, writing: "He will be responsible for his brother? Maybe I offer me to debate Putin?" He stated that he agreed to any debate if the opponent is known for something except a relative, and suggested sending his younger brother instead.
In response to this, Dvorkovich fell upon the statements that Navalny chopped and was afraid of revelations. The blogger proposed to stop the discussion and publish evidence that Dvorkovich boots like this: "You are a chatterbox and live at the expense of your brother. If you have any evidence, ask for mercy, publish. But you are only much language." As a result, the entrepreneur promised to lay out his arguments on the blog. Arkady Dvorkovich even intervened in the discussion, tried to intercede with his brother, offending the statements that he provides him, but, in turn, refused the debate.