From someone else's voice

I think the authorities make a big mistake, going into the explanations of their actions. This is me under the influence of “Letters of 55”. They say that, entering into dialogue with the people, all power loses magical sacred mystery. This is a romantic version. And in our case, entering into a kind of dialogue, the government shows that she has nothing to lose.

Remember that after the revelations of Natalia Vasilyeva it took ten days to find the answer. Ten days those who are supposed to have broken the head, what to do in this filthy situation. And they decided that since Danilkin was at the same time as a rug in the hallway to wipe his legs, and like a napkin in a tube for intimate hygiene, then let's lower the man in the shit. It doesn’t matter whether Danilkin really brought other people's finished texts from somewhere or dictated to him paragraphs. He essentially read his text. How was it from S.V. Mikhalkov? "From someone else's voice"? He sang someone else's song in court. And when he was shoved to Pimanov for an interview, he continued, like behind the souffler, to read out someone else's text, even if he came up with specific formulations himself.

But it is significant that in ten days the comrades did not come up with anything better than committing stupidity ... to perform it again! If Danilkin first read someone else's play and did not believe him, then you just need to read someone else's play again - and they will believe it. Such, apparently, is their logic.

And with collective letters - the same story. The magnificent, of course, the idea came up with colleagues from Freedom. Re -read the classics, so to speak. To extract a letter of six years ago and find out whether those whose names are under it really signed it. Better late than never. And the sudden. Not only did the signatures turn out to be the second freshness, but also the signatories came across the elongated. With a mother and a whistle. Also, the liberated people of lemons or daredevils, but they did not call the “United Russia” in the public space.

And what was offered to us after the old letter turned out to be a bullshit? We were offered a new letter! As with Danilkin: if you make the same stupidity again, it should turn into wisdom. It was better, of course, that the “letter of 55” was signed by all those who signed it in 2005-for a complete analogy. But this is still not the film "Dumb, even dumber." Therefore, they found others.

Dear Irina Yasina, and not only she, noted that there were no people among the signatories whose opinion she would listen to. But the thing is that there are only nowhere to find 55 indisputable authorities in our country! And on the second double of writing and even more so. I suspect that the general public of these citizens generally knows ten people. And then: the main star of the list Tina Kandelaki was immediately confused on Twitter and her own phone, so it is logical to assume that her signature under the letter also turned out to be as a result of a random pressing of some button.

But this whole situation generally showed that the authorities have no one to hide. In the elections, they connect some governors and generals who are good only their positions. And when you need to show living people, there is no one! And when it is necessary to come up with at least something, only gray-haired Soviet so-thoughts with collective letters and speeches in the style “did not read, but I condemn” are “invented”.

I think the authorities need to be tied with this. Because it will be even worse further. Danilkin’s new performance will end for him Corvalol right on the air, and I am afraid of the third letter, and the people will not be enough, unless, of course, the directors of any Giproryba and Giprohleb in alphabetical order will not fall on us.

Collage hedgehog