
This is a personal blog. The text could be written in the interests of the author or third parties. The 7x7 editors are not involved in its creation and may not share the author’s opinion. The registration of blogs on 7x7 is open for authors of various views.
I love, ... but strange love?
The attitude to liberalism of the 90s or the modern one is very complicated for me.
In the summer of 1993, everyone flooded everyone. They did not pay a salary. We stuck for one day, and, together sitting on a school bus, we, teachers, went to the head of the district. He, hiding his eyes, muttered in his nose: “The other day he will list the IMF, then the money will be!”
I believe that liberalism is a bankrupt direction of modern political thought. My playful test and authors of posts, the opinion of Oleg Chub, showed their extreme individualism in the perception and replication of the idea of liberalism. Again, the posts are followed by the same requirement of the 90s: boundless political freedom in the absence of all social obligations. I already wrote about the attitude towards the Gorbachevs. The liberalism of this period was exported to Russia in the hope of sowing the turmoil, and received success only because he acted as a project for the construction of a new society, a new utopia of universal happiness. Then I myself was confident in the need for these implementations into our political model of life.
Liberalism brought down the USSR as a power, breaking all the obligations and connection of the state and nation, diluting them to the limit, deeply injuring the national organism. Families torned in alive, but what about Nagornoi Karabakh? My students Mirzoyan Arkady and his brother Argo Mirzoyan this year have already returned from the army and speak the pure Komi language. Their beauty-sister Armenii Mirzoyan, a student of the Finno-Ugric faculty of SSU. They arrived in Komi, like refugees from in 1994, along with their mother. Father remained in Armenia.
Now ultraliberalism has completely outlived itself, existing only as an extremely politicized course of a narrow circle of politicians extoling Western civilization without an elementary understanding of nature and the mechanisms of its development. Novodvorskaya, like her admiration for Mishiko, clearly illustrates this. And our Vovan and their Mishiko-Oba will eat their tie in the struggle for power and will arrive so if necessary, obviously not liberal.
I consider social liberalism a friendly direction of national thought in Russia (K-???), but so far he is in the stage of the embryo and does not manifest himself in any way. Social liberalism is possible in the liberal direction of political thought. It will be aimed at the partnership of the state and the nation, and this is the common point of contact with conservatism. But social liberalism in Russian conditions is still very weak or its development is unlikely. And this is a consequence of the “hurricanes” of the 90s, which rushed over our lives and fates and deeply injured our national organism.
I am a woman. I want the certainty of tomorrow. And my daughter, Janin, would marry an earning and strong worker of any profession and nationality. Without any conventions.