Translated material
Kafkianism in the Presidential Administration
After the publication of an interview with Marina Salier , who compromises Vladimir Putin, the current Prime Minister of Russia, Radio Liberty has repeatedly tried to receive a comment by the Presidential Administration (AP).
The fact is that the investigation in this case in the early 90s was conducted by the AP control department, now it is just AP. It was there that Radio Freedom recommended that the former head of the department Yuri Boldyrev recommended. True, Boldyrev said: "It is unlikely that you will achieve something - after all, this department took turns in turn by Alexei Kudrin and Vladimir Putin." But a negative result is also a result.
On my computer, I have a folder "Letters to the village of grandfather - press secretaries" (to divert your soul - at least in the name). And in this folder the text of Timakova appeared - the presidential press secretary. In it - a request to get acquainted with
Archives of the Presidential Administration regarding Salier's Report.
At first, a month after the publication of an interview with Salier (that is, more than a year ago), I sent a request for fax, as I was recommended by phone in the apparatus of Natalia Timakova. Naturally, the fax was printed on the form and equipped with a seal/signatures. True, it was not possible to get any answer. The fax turned out to be “under consideration”, and a month later, when it was already possible to finish it, an employee of the Timakova apparatus pulled: “Why did you decide that the answer will be? Fax is actually not a document.”
And why was it necessary to ask him to send him? And then what is a document?
The secretary advised to send the text by mail. "103132, Old Square ..., Timakova N.A." The communication department accepted my “notification” letter in the name of Timakova, as indicated by receipt No. 04303 ... about payment of 27.65 rubles from 02-03-2011.
And I began to wait for a notification of delivery. This is a simple mail piece of paper, which the sender himself fills and sticks to the letter. When handing the addressee, the paper is returned to the sender. In any case, when I used to send letters, the notifications were returned - even from Ussuriysk. But, this time, a piece of paper from the old square did not return. So, the document "did not reach ..."
The administration’s employees again tried to force me to “send everything by mail, it works”, but I insisted on personal delivery.
Personally to present the "appeals of citizens and organizations" in the window of the "expedition" of the presidential administration - it was here that I was sent from the apparatus of Timakova.
“And the seal with you? We will not accept without printing,” the expedition employee mockingly announced and slammed the door. In such a window, I handed over the urine in the Soviet clinic. And what, similar sensations; The line and shouting - as in childhood.
I pressed the call button until the other employee was more inflated, I opened the window. She smiled. And she apologized - “Well, yes, only we have it; some can bring the seal”, issued two forms, ordered to put the seal of the organization on them and return with it. Otherwise, it is impossible to accept the letter to Timakova.
On forms with the exhaustive name "Register No. ..." - a few count. In one of them, "importance", according to the model of filling, should indicate "n/s". This abbreviation means "unequal" ....
On the same day, slurred forms were stamped and I again besieged the reception window. "Oh, look what a funny seal is! Have you ever seen one"? - So the "angry" receiver of letters spoke to "good".
"Register" of the presidential administration
Finally, I was given a piece of paper - all the same “register” with a completely unstable seal: “SFS of Russia. Expedition No. 3. Department No. 1”. On the stamped piece of paper it was said that N. Timakova Kirilenko A.V. On June 14-50, 2011, one package was handed over. There is no information about what kind of "package" is on a piece of paper.
Later, on the phone, I was notified of the number assigned to the letter. This number and date- from 29/06- I with satisfaction dictated to the employee of the Timakova apparatus. She said that there would be an "official answer within a month." I am waiting. And I'm afraid. Because no seal was recorded which letter I handed over to Timakova and what she should answer.
The fact is that the investigation in this case in the early 90s was conducted by the AP control department, now it is just AP. It was there that Radio Freedom recommended that the former head of the department Yuri Boldyrev recommended. True, Boldyrev said: "It is unlikely that you will achieve something - after all, this department took turns in turn by Alexei Kudrin and Vladimir Putin." But a negative result is also a result.
On my computer, I have a folder "Letters to the village of grandfather - press secretaries" (to divert your soul - at least in the name). And in this folder the text of Timakova appeared - the presidential press secretary. In it - a request to get acquainted with
Archives of the Presidential Administration regarding Salier's Report.
At first, a month after the publication of an interview with Salier (that is, more than a year ago), I sent a request for fax, as I was recommended by phone in the apparatus of Natalia Timakova. Naturally, the fax was printed on the form and equipped with a seal/signatures. True, it was not possible to get any answer. The fax turned out to be “under consideration”, and a month later, when it was already possible to finish it, an employee of the Timakova apparatus pulled: “Why did you decide that the answer will be? Fax is actually not a document.”
And why was it necessary to ask him to send him? And then what is a document?
The secretary advised to send the text by mail. "103132, Old Square ..., Timakova N.A." The communication department accepted my “notification” letter in the name of Timakova, as indicated by receipt No. 04303 ... about payment of 27.65 rubles from 02-03-2011.
And I began to wait for a notification of delivery. This is a simple mail piece of paper, which the sender himself fills and sticks to the letter. When handing the addressee, the paper is returned to the sender. In any case, when I used to send letters, the notifications were returned - even from Ussuriysk. But, this time, a piece of paper from the old square did not return. So, the document "did not reach ..."
The administration’s employees again tried to force me to “send everything by mail, it works”, but I insisted on personal delivery.
Personally to present the "appeals of citizens and organizations" in the window of the "expedition" of the presidential administration - it was here that I was sent from the apparatus of Timakova.
“And the seal with you? We will not accept without printing,” the expedition employee mockingly announced and slammed the door. In such a window, I handed over the urine in the Soviet clinic. And what, similar sensations; The line and shouting - as in childhood.
I pressed the call button until the other employee was more inflated, I opened the window. She smiled. And she apologized - “Well, yes, only we have it; some can bring the seal”, issued two forms, ordered to put the seal of the organization on them and return with it. Otherwise, it is impossible to accept the letter to Timakova.
On forms with the exhaustive name "Register No. ..." - a few count. In one of them, "importance", according to the model of filling, should indicate "n/s". This abbreviation means "unequal" ....
On the same day, slurred forms were stamped and I again besieged the reception window. "Oh, look what a funny seal is! Have you ever seen one"? - So the "angry" receiver of letters spoke to "good".
"Register" of the presidential administration
Finally, I was given a piece of paper - all the same “register” with a completely unstable seal: “SFS of Russia. Expedition No. 3. Department No. 1”. On the stamped piece of paper it was said that N. Timakova Kirilenko A.V. On June 14-50, 2011, one package was handed over. There is no information about what kind of "package" is on a piece of paper.
Later, on the phone, I was notified of the number assigned to the letter. This number and date- from 29/06- I with satisfaction dictated to the employee of the Timakova apparatus. She said that there would be an "official answer within a month." I am waiting. And I'm afraid. Because no seal was recorded which letter I handed over to Timakova and what she should answer.