Creeping without benefit

So Alexander Babakov left "Fair Russia" for the sake of the Putin Popular Front or still did not leave? They are looking for firefighters, looking for a police ... Mironov on Twitter is relieved with relief with a comrade-in-arms who did not want to give way to the place of the Vice-Spiker of the State Duma. Levichv refers to the SSMESC, sent to him by a potential fugitive: no, Babakov remains in the party. Everyone with bated breath awaits the press conference of the vice speaker. Or do they not expect?

Because none of those who comment on the real or imaginary flight of Babakov from Mironov to Putin can explain what it matters. That is, for Mironov, of course, it has - Babakov was considered one of the main money bags of his absurd organization. And for Russian politics - unless, of course, there is one? Would Babakov not in Fair Russia, but in United Russia - would someone even notice him? At the same time, Babakov - the benefit of business capacity allow - could have been the same as now, to be a vice -speaker of the State Duma - United Russia has a lot of them, and by no means about every Russians are informed.

Or here's the following question: what are Babakov’s political views? And will he have to change them if he moves from Fair Russia to ONF? And if Babakov really leaves “Fair Russia” because it became an opposition party, then what kind of party was Mironov’s team before? If not opposition, then why did it exist at all and opposed the premiere party? And if opposition, then why did Alexander Babakov only noticed it now? He was not informed where he was going?

All these, of course, are rhetorical issues in which there is no policy at all - one boring bureaucratic fuss, underwater swimming in a puddle, occasionally bubbled with a remark on Twitter, SS or even a whole press conference. This fuss would be curious at least a little if its participants could at least solve something. But since the country decides everything exactly one, a maximum of one and a half official, our heroes become serious people exclusively somewhere on the extra-Russian periphery: either some Ukrainian regional deputy will move the stool, then some Tiraspol boss will say a delighted speech, then some Sukhumian presidential candidate will treat wine wine. Because even there, on the periphery, there is some kind of, and political life, competition, the struggle for power and money requiring decision-making, and not the execution of instructions. And therefore, there people stubbornly do not want to believe that their puffing guests do not affect anything other than the graphics of wiping dust in their own cabinets and are probably not capable of any real political activity - they were not selected for that.

Therefore, I will not be surprised if the departure (non -wore?) Babakov will be portrayed in the extra -Russian press as a conflict in the opposition party. But there is no conflict, there is no opposition party, there is no choice - this is the matter. And how many representatives of the Russian intelligentsia on the pages of the famous Moscow newspaper would not convince us that there was a choice , you only need to beg Dmitry Anatolyevich to persuade Vladimir Vladimirovich to allow him to sit still, nothing will change, the choice will not appear.

Because the choice is when citizens choose their leaders, and not when these very managers choose who citizens vote for. This choice leads to both the degradation of society and the degradation of power. That is why Babakov is no different from Mironov. Mironov - from Levichv. Levichv - from Medvedev. Medvedev - from Putin. Putin - from Babakov. And further in a circle. Because gray has no shades, no matter how much we try to consider them.