

Photo: ITAR-TASS
By the beginning of autumn, an idyll reigned in the mortgage market: “The mortgage and housing lending agency” ( AIZHK ) reported that the percentage rates on ruble mortgages for the first time in history fell below 12% per annum. At the same time, the housing availability coefficient, calculated under the “Housing” program for 2011-2015, has decreased below the target level (see graphics). Now you need to save up a standard kopecks of three people, if you put off all income, is needed for less than four years. And even in Moscow, where the accessibility coefficient traditionally goes off scale, it is steadily at the levels, significantly lower than the pre -crisis: a family where two work and put off all income, it is necessary to accumulate 7-8 years for housing. After 5–10 years, according to the government mortgage of the development of a mortgage, which provides for the availability of housing for half the population, a mortgage paradise could even come. According to AIZHK calculations, the declared goal is achieved, it is only necessary that the real housing prices grow 20-30% slower than citizens' incomes. But it was not there.
Ruble mortgage rates, 2009–2011
For loans issued within a month, % per annum
Source: AIZHK
How many years to save for an apartment
* The ratio of the average market value of a standard apartment with a total area of 54 square meters. meters and average annual total cash income of a family consisting of 3 people
Source: AIZHK, Rosstat, Department of Economic Policy and Development of Moscow, IRN, Slon.ru calculations
Model dynamics of income and housing prices
* 30% of families by 2015 and 50% of families by 2020 - according to the government mortgage development strategy, using their own or borrowed means
Source: AIZHK
There are several mechanisms that could protect borrowers and bring the Russian mortgage market closer to the level of developed countries. Says Deputy General Director of AIZHK Andrey Semenyuk: |
It is advisable to introduce a restriction on the amount of payments in the income of the borrower when servicing a loan. The restriction on the issuance of a mortgage loan can be set at a level of a maximum of 45% of the income of the borrower, and the right of the borrower to restructure the debt - if this indicator exceeded 60% of the monthly income. So far, there are difficulties for legislative consolidation of such a norm due to difficulties with confirming the income of borrowers and the correct calculation of the share of payments in income. Borrowers who took a loan with a floating rate for a long time without restriction on the size of the maximum rate take over colossal risks. To solve the issues of protecting borrowers who have taken loans with a floating rate or in currency, may introduce restrictions on the amount of maximum payments in the monthly income of the borrower. But now they do not represent a big problem for the market, since the level of financial literacy after the crisis has increased. In many countries, after the recovery of the mortgaged housing, the borrower owes nothing to the bank. It happens that the borrower’s debt is 200% of the cost of the realized housing. It is necessary to make the debt of the borrower finite. The loan agreement may provide an option under which the bank will not be able to demand a debt above a certain threshold in 100-120% of the cost of the pledge. In other cases, the restriction of the debt and the settlement of the debt will take place as part of the development law of the individual. An increase in the debt of the borrower over the cost of the pledge occurs not only due to the fall in real estate prices, but also due to the accrual of fines and penalties. The dissemination of the practice of timely restructuring of loans and the adoption of the Bankruptcy Law will lead to the accrual of fines and penalties to the bank will stop in time. When the amount of the collateral is not enough to cover the entire debt to the bank, the insurance company can cover the difference. This will lead to a rise in the cost of a loan rate for tenth or hundredths of a percent. Now the banks have no incentive to demand mortgage insurance, because it is not taken into account in assessing the risk of loans in the formation of reserves. It is necessary to differentiate loans depending on the risk when calculating the rate of sufficiency of bank capital.