Darwin's network triumph

On social networks, no one has an age. The social network itself may be chosen by age, but inside it it is no longer important. There, without knowing a person, no longer understand how old he is. Even if you know him, you will forget about it anyway. But this is not because everyone becomes virtuals there, they would not have enough mind for this. This is because it is no longer a user itself, but another, such a humble creature that arose somehow even by itself.

That is, it will not immediately arise. In the social network you need to get settled by accepting its rules. It is also unclear here that the first: will you run into the structure when you destroy your age or vice versa? Rather, the second - otherwise it would be difficult, the majority will not play in such a role -playing game.

Of course, we must speak the local language with the intonations inherent in it, etc., and all this changes there. Say, once (these creatures have not yet) was used “IMHO”, but now there is no, because the real particular opinion for a social network being is impossible. It is simply not for this, this creature, as it is, cannot be. It is necessary not to always coincide with the general opinion, but not to coincide with it only in the nuances. And, of course, the general opinion is obviously what exists for everyone. The main rule is to respond to everything. Of course, the same great picture about protein is appropriate here.

But proteins are too art, they should be detailed. Yes, it is possible to take root in the skeleton only through emotions for any reason. With all these "read everyone!", "Repost!" etc. Moreover, the more obvious the reaction of the network creature, the more useful it is to him, purely as an element of self -quality.

Yes, so about the changing fashion for words. For example, “Preedics” will now indicate a creature that has long been in the subject. Now other keywords, well, there are “mimimi”, or something. It is interesting here that some templates are leaving, but others are fixed and become important for social networks forever. Here is the "srach." Or the topic “Ah” - well, Russians are such Russians, girls are such girls, etc. So far it looks like a seasonal phenomenon, approximately like “Kisa Cook” - already almost forgotten, like ancient Greece, alas. But it seems that “A A” has a potential.

It is also interesting that the “srach” from the emotional statement of anal-oriented users took shape in the genre. More precisely, it became a definition of the activity inherent in this space - in the villages there are plowing and sowing, in social networks, srach is produced. The word even lost its emotionality, becoming a term. Of course, then the connection with political technologies is interesting, more precisely - with creatures associated with them. For example, the political technological “sketch” - the meaning of the “sampling of shit to the fan” did not particularly fix it, but is sometimes used. But the “drain is read out” is quite plentiful and almost included in speech etiquette. In other words, the dictionary of network creatures does not exist in isolation. It's more complicated.

Here are the “hamsters”, which from the epithet gave rise to a typical representative of network creatures. Moreover, after all, no one remembers (most likely) that the “hamster” on the network is a long -standing word. But at first it meant Hompege, a private page. The social networks freed the masses from the need to learn how to program at least their hamsters, so that the users themselves became hamsters: the tool became designated. Some kind of new McLuin here, not quite reflected.

This is in the form of existing a network being. As for the content, it is easier with it: since for the social networks the main thing is the constant production of assessments, then the border between the formal and the substantial part is blurred for it. For him, emotions are the essence of the message. Once again, everything is the same unknown so far.

Moreover, emotions are uniform, they equalize - for example, if mental abilities are in mind - all network creatures: in the emotional sphere, quality is not fundamentally. In everyday life, people are taught to deal with this, but here is another option - it is actually normative, determines the industry itself.

So, in order for the social network creature equally existed among other S.-S. Socialities, he does not need to offer new assessments, bring new meanings and even report atypical events. On the contrary, the topic of his statements should be the most common, opinions should be obvious - otherwise it will not even be rejected, but not noticed. All this is S.-S. Sugrity does exactly in order to survive. Purely instinctively, how breathing.

Now about who this creature is. In general, the case of such a transformation is known. For example, when a person who does not have the skills of writing suddenly decides to report himself anything in the literary, in his opinion, form. Well, he does not write words, but as it were, he speaks. In the case of literature, he will become sad, and in social networks everything is in order. All personal is given to the social networks. The user had personal experience, private life and even age, perhaps even education. But S.-S. Zh., emotionally dull on the keys, will make all this insignificant. Yes, this indicates the doubtfulness of the mental qualities and personal experience of the user, but otherwise he would not have climbed into this story.

Therefore, S.-S. Zh. This is a crooked symbiosis. S.-S. Z. lives at the expense of the original user, parasitizing on it. As a psychotherapeutic exercise, it can even be useful - no matter how a person in life is a turquoil, on a social network he will become social. 80% of his statements should be understood by everyone, 20% remain him for his personal life, creating personal participation in this matter. Well, or 85% and 15%. Or 90% and 10%. Of course, when the user got there and became a creature, then you need to pedal all the time, responding for any reason - otherwise not to survive. Alas, the user thinks that he himself is exactly, and not the creature into which he turned.

In addition to age, there is no memory in social networks-no one remembers anything else below 50-100 entries in LiveJournal and two Facebook screens. Links to the fact that such a creature was written then, absurd, it is S.-S. Z. A matter wants to think that it was yesterday. And he was not, it arises again with each new statement. Nobody will go to his links, there is nothing there already - because it’s not the point, how and what was, but how great it is that we all gathered here today. This is not a reproach, the meaning of the event is to reproduce yourself in a network form, in the team it is easier to do. Even if we are talking about creatures that there is no meaning in which there should not be, because the main thing is feelings and sincere. Although, where does this and the other come from? Yes, actually, where does the memory come from, when there is no age?

There are no complaints about creatures - these are really not people sitting at computers, but such creatures that people themselves do not answer at all. But if this machine works like this that follows from this mechanics? What morals of brainless nature do she open? It can be distracted that the main trend of behavior of the S.-S. S. Socials is crooked. But only this is also evaluative and emotionally, what is the detachment here. Here is either inside or outside. However, it is interesting whether it is a purely Russian case or not. It seems that it is Russian, but not so important. The main thing is that in Russia all this arose and exists exactly in this form.

The boundaries of the region are interesting (not all parts of social networks act according to this scheme), the mechanics of exposure. This, once again, is not role -playing games - because there is no memory here, but how to play the role, without remembering it? In addition, there are already so many of these 80% that it is unclear - what can change the remaining 20%? However, these 20 individual percent should also be banal to become clear. And then what will any event in reality be inside? But where does the events come from when there is no memory? They exist exactly as an occasion for saying, that is, it is like a broth for the growth of S.-S. S.

In general, if everything is in common, then this is just a passage of time. But what is the course of time possible when they themselves have no age? This is interestingly changing the idea of ​​the death of the creature: it is painless for the community as a whole. Purely hygienic deleting, and nobody needs records of the disconnected creature. That is, there was an eternity inside. Well, or they were walled up, what's the difference. The main thing is that Darwin was right. The species continue to occur, evolution is alive.