
1. It became known that Boris Gryzlov can take part in the election debate. “If there is a necessity, expediency, the topic and opponent will be one of the party leaders (competing with EP), we do not exclude this option,” Interfax quoted the head of the Central Executive Committee of the party Andrei Vorobyov. That is, B. Gryzlov, who had not previously expressed any desire to participate in the election graters, in fact turned out to be a super-script that could take anyone in the dispute, otherwise what to rely on him if necessary.
There is also one more important statement. Secretary of the Presidium of the General Council of the party, Sergei Nevorov, commented on the content of the United Russia pre -election program, which is expected to be published on October 19. According to him, freedom, justice and political competition come to the fore in the program. “ In the center of our program is a man ,” Neverov also said. Well, yes. And we all know this person, as usual.
2. There is also certainty about a person. All the same secretary of the Presidium of the General Council of EP Sergey Neverov said that EP planned the second part of the party congress on November 27. And so, at this event, V. Putin will be officially nominated to the president of Russia. According to publications, both Putin and Medvedev will perform at the second part of the congress, "which should raise the rating of" United Russia "." Here yes, it is unclear whose words are these (well, about the fact that “should raise the rating), but lazy to google. So it should be otherwise. Not only that, as they say,“ Vedomosti ”in the room of October 12, Putin will tell in his speech what he is going to do the president’s post ” - writes Lenta.ru . Again, I put the laziness again, because it doesn’t matter because it doesn’t matter because it doesn’t matter. Beautiful.
3. The Federation Council approved the bill to reduce the passing barrier to the State Duma. But this is not about now, but about 2016. It's good when the prospect is visible to everyone? So, in 2016, "full-fledged factions will be able to form parties that have gained five percent of votes of voters." Now, meanwhile, not everything is simple, and many do not know: the passing barrier is seven percent of the vote. But! The party, which received from five to six percent, receives one place in the Duma (something like a bonus point in rugby-even with damage). And those who receive from six to seven percent of the vote take two mandates. It looks somewhat petty and anti-systemic, but someone can come in handy. Well, in fact, is it good that they think about 2016 already?
4. In fact, about art: the speaker of the Federation Council V. Matvienko instructed to accelerate the work on writing a portrait of her predecessor in this post Sergey Mironov: “There is no my predecessor and also because the portrait is drawn, I will ask the government’s apparatus to speed up this work,” Matvienko said, answering the question of journalists about the absence of a portrait of Mironov.
That is, there are portraits of all the chairmen of the Federation Council and already the chairmen of the State Council of the Russian Empire at the entrance, but it all ends with the face of Yegor Stroev, who was the chairman until 2001. Well, and the reporters of the people know which smart, so they asked Matvienko about why there is no portrait? " My portrait should not be, since I am the current chairman of the Federation Council ," she explained.
But here there is an alarming topic: that is, at least in the Council of the Federation, only images of the worked politicians hang on the walls. But what about the practice of widespread hanging the presidents? After all, after all, their place of work is the whole country?
5. Well, if about art, then about art: it is reported that a monument appeared before entering the Moscow City Court - “Fountain symbolizing publicity, the author of the idea of which is the chairman of the Moscow City Court Olga Egorov,” the press service of the court said. Well, Olga Egorova, this is oh !
In one place they even wrote that “Olga Egorova became a symbol of the current judicial system, which is often criticized by human rights activists and officials” and who would have thought that she also thought about the beautiful? The author of the project was the "Honorary Worker of Culture of the city of Moscow, the sculptor Natalya Opioc."
According to the description (you don’t really see in the photo here), "the new sculpture is made in the form of an angel calling the bell and trampling the snake." The same is a bit too much for one angel - both the snakes and the bell, but not Julius, he is Caesar and where does, in fact, publicity? But, nevertheless, " the sculptural composition symbolizes one of the fundamental principles of legal proceedings - the principle of publicity ," said the chairman of the Moscow City Court. "
Well, if here on the topic of the state and symbolic statues, then a lot of things are written about this, at least, Guberman : "I see the state with a statue: a man in bronze full of power, a huge security organ is hidden under a fig leaf." Well, everything is more humane here, but why is publicity associated with the topic of pouring water in vain? Or this refers to the implementation of the idea of Kozma Prutkov: "If you have a fountain, shut it up; let me relax and the fountain." They will give, how not to give!
6. Because here's another thing in the field of relations of art and power: young people who "painted the monument to Lenin in yellow with green specks" were detained in the find. " It is reported that "the vandals were seized by banks of paint. Young people admitted that they painted part of the monument, wanting to create the impression that Lenin was sitting on cheese ."
This creative is represented by a picture near the heading of the note. Hence the question: why is it reported that the monument is painted, when only a pedestal? And as for the quality of art, everything is nice, but, of course, everything had to be painted. But the very fact that this is in the find is very good. Cultural alliance in action, all that. But why the hell should Lenin sit on the cheese? After all, this is not without reason, but no one asked.