Scenes from knightly times

The meeting of D.A. Medvedev with the Stapyang, or something, people who came to meet with D.A. Medvedev, is good that no one had anything there. Medvedev is not elected, but they can not be different, they cannot be one goal. Therefore, the system is visible here.

From the fact that there was no strict goal -setting (it is not clear what exactly Medvedev could now or later), the event was divided into several separate scenes. Each of which spoke about something of its own, and together they appropriately developed into something extremely familiar long ago. That's all in full .

So, since no one will vote for the president (well, he does not go to the polls), then he should not say anything election. That is, yes, he is the first person in the list of EP, but this does not mean his responsibility for the result. And then, there Putin will already go to the presidency from the EP, so the individual responsibility for the EP rating is clearly not the main thing.

Although yes, the attitude towards EP was stated even in a surreal form: “ I am now the flesh from the flesh of“ United Russia ” ” (in response to the question of F. Bondarchuk). Given the place in her party list, it turns out just some advanced flesh, which is gallant and even partially courteous.

Worse in the part of the EP: " In addition, if we talk about" United Russia ", as a person who is now at the head of the list, I believe that" United Russia "should change itself. This is the command of time ." It is strange to go to the elections at the head of the party list, regarding which it is reported that it must certainly change. It is some kind of ambiguous pre-election messiage, informing something about its current state. Galance and courtesy is not visible, but a certain knight component is evident - despite the shortcomings, we promise to fix them after you vote for us even black.

The main thing seems to be the topic: it is reported that despite the organizational movements of D.A. Medvedev, all modernization projects on the spot will live. And in general, the entire modernization package, he is with him. This was reported centripetally: " If I understand correctly, everyone who gathered here is people who want to see our country changing, that is, those who advocate the modernization of our society, our state. So you are my supporters." That is, modernization is it. Advanced flesh of modernization, in fact. As gallantly, and courteous, and knightly. And this is the second important statement (after the "flesh from the flesh of EP").

Or is all this at all for good reason?

Here we can assume a third, almost secret statement - it should not be directly from the words of D.A. Medvedva, but why not think up? Here, Putin built a scheme when not the main president. And in this scheme, Medvedev will now become the main thing, but Putin, occupying a triumphal place, gradually leaves politics in the entire enhancing radiance of his historical role.

The scenario is not very sophisticated, but indirectly it is still provided with a quote: “ Despite the decision that was made, I would like to tell you about it as people close and pretty to me, I will tell you without unnecessary modesty: I am not going to underestimate my potential, which, in my opinion, has not been fully realized. It, in general, is not right to bring millions of people who once trusted me and that I once trusted power and I have once trusted my power and I have once trusted power and who associate hopes with me for the future . " Knightly and gallant.

The theme of chivalry is intensifying (Medvedev, as it were, tells this to S. Minaev): " In politics, from the point of view of our approaches, we are very close people, and in everyday life we ​​do not know, maybe few people believe in it, but we are really not competitors, but close comrades and friends. Twenty years old. Otherwise, there would have been no my political career in Moscow." Purely vassals, sovereigns, knightly responsibility. What is now for the economic formation in the yard (the pun was inevitable) when careers are built in the way? This, of course, is extremely courteous simple -hearted.

Immediately turning into intimate gallantry: “ When my comrade Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin called me and says: come on, come, I thought, why did I need it, to be honest? Why did I agree all? And when I arrived in Moscow, I worked just a few months, I realized that I did the right thing, because I couldn’t refuse such proposals. And not because it was a personal career, the opportunity to become a big one, the possibility of becoming big The boss is some serious processes, but because if we are, then who, if we are invited by fate, if you want it?

This, of course, has brought the theme of Fortune. Such a normal feudalism in the prime of its modernization, which retains its basis: senor, vassal, faithful squire, initiation in knights (this has already happened at the event). And yet, a great sense of responsibility for everyone and everything that is possible only with enlightened absolutism: " And women are well done! We have an average life expectancy of women - 74 years. Men need to take an example from women ." But why were the complaints of cats and approval of crocodiles not in the same context?

Even as it is said: “ I’m not at the rally now, I am in the circle of supporters ” - well, yes, in fact we need to organize the yard (then this will be offered, of course). All this is a miracle what is the charm, but only why should one be for "United Russia" and is it really not to become the courtier without it?

Who are these people (in a good way)?

Who came - meaning. Of course, everyone has their own reasons-someone about their business, who out of curiosity, and someone because they called. All are different, but there is some list on which they were called and which, accordingly, was compiled, despite their obvious differences. Well, yes, they are different, yes. But who came to such events in fact gives consent to what corresponds to those definitions that the presiding judge at the meeting will give.

As for the personalities, some were announced : “ At the Saturday meeting, Bondarchuk, of course, called, as the general director of Glavkino, Ilya Bachurin, musicians Sergey Bugaev and Igor Butman, the rector of the MSTU Bauman Anatoly Alexandrov, the head of Viktor Vekselberg, the General Director of Yandadi Volozha, Galerist Marat Gelman, United Russians, Andrei Vorobyov, Robert Schlegel and Alexander Khinshtein, TV presenters Tina Kadelaki, Alexei Pimanov and Sergey Brilev, as well as the pop star Victoria Daineko, writer Sergei Minaev and others of more than 150 participants .... He connects with him hopes for modernization and the future, and he considers it necessary to continue to communicate with these people directly, ”the press secretary of the head of state Natalya Timakova told Izvestia .

So all these people are included in the list called "Support Group D.A. Medvedev." And it’s also interesting what media the spokesman for the head of the State Dourarie announced this group. Through "Izvestia", otherwise. Also, judging by the responses to the television program, there were I. Zasursky, Cheparukhin, Kirill Benedictov, Sergey Bugaev ("Africa"), poet Rodionov ( UPD : Rodionov actually dissolved from this discourse), velvetov, curator Borovsky, Olga Sviblova, representatives of Vincuration, D. Gutov ("History of Art" - according to the "historian" - according to the voiced by the voiced Self -identification) and many others, who remained not specifically mentioned.

The final clarity to the definition of this group makes a heading the transcript of the conversation on the president’s official website: " Dmitry Medvedev’s meeting with supporters ." The supporters came, since it is written. And even - by transitivity - supporters of EP (since "flesh from the flesh"). Such a fortune.

We must generalize

In this place, you need to go to at least some theory, otherwise you can get stuck on quoting who said what and how it will affect the socio-social life. Because they said everything is fine there. Though Tina Kandelaki, although Ivan Zasursky. Zasursky, of course, is better than anyone: " Dmitry Anatolyevich, you know, first of all, I wanted to thank you for the fact that you agreed and continue to take part in political life ... And I wanted to say a few more" thank you "because I enjoy freedom of speech on our Internet, and it seems to me that you are also involved in this." All this can be quoted for a long time, so it is all wonderful. But now is not the time, you need to generalize. And yes, I would like a complete list, yet. Why not name it, it became clear who is now at the court.

Around the same time, D. Borko made a selection of quotes - either in connection, or simply coincided:
“ Let these people-we’ll call them“ atypical Russians ”-now in the minority, but there are not so few of them: this is every fifth Russian. It is very important that some kind of self-identification of these people is happening so that they will at least find out that there are a lot of them. (How to call themselves? The term“ intelligentsia ”is unlikely to become a turn ... “ Our national “I” ”. Magun, Maxim Rudnev ").
" Disappointment in the previous elevated ideas and principles does not lead to a change in the picture of reality, but to the destruction of the entire value-normative order in a closed and repressive society, especially when it begins to change. Therefore, the result of negative mobilization is a scorched value space, within which no semantic innovations, an enthusiastic rise.
... This is a rejection ... is not transformed into certain efforts to consolidate group interests or views, the formation of unions and associations. And he takes the form of expectation, projection for the future of some kind of uncertain in the nature of the social explosion, collapse, crisis, which will demolish this authoritarian system and open the way to accelerated modernization and democratization. In this case, it is not about real social stresses and possible crises ... ” (Lev Gudkov,“ Rebirth of Soviet Man ”, within the framework of the“ Soviet Man ”project).
" Russian history was so tragically developed that everyone who fought with the state, with the authorities, acquired the features of this power. And I think that going beyond the borders of the Soviet person is associated with another space where the dignity of a person and its value is not associated with status when our power is deciding who is the most intelligent. Gradually in recent years, despite the general degradation of society, this is happening, they really arise, they are associated with art, with public life, with public life. And with the processes of self -organization ”(T. Vorozheikina, a discussion on the radio of the open seminar“ Soviet or modern man? ”).

Well, what are the “supporters of Medvedev” in this scheme, namely, as these “atypical Russians” for himself? On him, Medvedev, this group will completely take the corresponding place, but those that are real there (only, it is unlikely, yet, every fifth), they will not be on his map. For him in this place there will be empty space. But he doesn’t matter to him, because he already has the type of representatives of such a group. What follows from this fact is unknown. Can they cause an empty space (in M.) to cause some stresses in a common field? Here, Gudkov writes that no.

And in fact - no, cannot. Because there is also an intimate thing: all offended by the fact that it is "the power in our way is the most intelligent one." Power - in this frame - does not consider the most intelligent everyone personally, individually, but to rally under such circumstances on the basis of "yes they consider us fools" - well, hardly. Although attempts are happening

And, again, sublimation through art ... Well, this is exactly sublimation, because the "going beyond the Soviet man" into art looks precisely and primarily as a search for a method to get out of it. In this version, "Sovietness" is still the most important. Because in spite of her, that is, thinking about her all the time. Well, at least art will help or something ...

Heavy and light, Bauman

Returning to the entrance word D.A. Medvedwa and, slowly thinking about it, you find strange rhymes there. It is strange to fight corruption at the same time and modernize. Modernization leads to a strong decrease in confidence in your place in life. It does not imply stable obligations, nor stability guarantees, or even any long-term and reliable contracts. When the next re-certification-optimization-reproduction takes place, then the remaining events in their official places are not so happy. They understand that the next time it will affect them, or even all at once in the option of some general optimization. And when such temporaryness is everywhere, then what the fight against corruption: life is a pure cigarette in the wind, you need to prepare at least a little straw from what is still at hand. This, of course, is lyrical reasoning.

But in the same connection, the topic of Skolkovo is curious: in fact, the personification of modernization is built, purely as a synonym for the strength of the modernization intentions of the authorities. Which, in fact, completely contradicts modernization trends as such. Here you can just refer to the bauman zigmont. He gave a lecture in Polit.ru , but there is a fluent there, and he also has the book “The current modernity”, “Liquid Modernity” - another 1999 (published in 2008 in Russian). The book is over 10 years and it is clear that it works. Heavy modernity, light modern, all that. Strong - fluid, and the moral is that now theoretically not to build modern school through a separate Skolkovo - this is just some kind of Oxymoron. Everything is already fluid, fast, delayed, with uncertainty. What is now in the clean field to build something solid. The direct opposite of what needs to be done.

However, taking into account fluidity and variability and Medvedev is present, this idea about the Great Government: “ We need to think about how to really change the system of public administration ... I propose to think about creating the so -called“ big government ”or, as they sometimes say, a“ expanded government ”, which will act together - together with the main party, which can form such a government, with“ United Russia ”, with civil society, with experts, with experts, with experts, with experts, with experts, with experts, with experts, with experts With the regional and municipal authorities, with all voters who are ready to vote for us, and even with those who do not agree with us, if they are ready for this, of course . "

But here it is not quite flexibility: an increase in some government is not a change in the management system. This type is small development of the territory in front of its hard and large lock - so that, if that, burn all these suburbs. It is also a matter, but who, in fact, what will be conquered here when the topic has long been different? But yes, these searches for informal turnover are either a public chamber around the Kremlin, then the ONF around United Russia, then the "large government" - around the government. This is obviously a strategy. It looks like the modernization of feudalism - and is it not interesting to see how all this will happen?

UPD: And there is a list, Kommersant scanned at the end of this article.