Three different simple -mindednesses

The main case, of course, was extremely fed. This is a story about private shooting made by K. Sobchak in a public place. The shooting was also accompanied by K. K.'s orders with an object of shooting on the topic of not ay-ah-ai-ai-ai-a-aircraft manager there are oysters of 500 r. A thing while numerous youth experiences difficulties with the implementation of their life plans. The point, of course, is how secular, so social, and in the fact itself, only the poor quality of the video is surprising (what kind of phone is this?). But this is not the point, it is in its consequences.

Namely, a rumor went (even with quotes) that "on Monday, Rosmolodezh sent letters to the media demanding to delete a video from her pages, shot by TV presenter Ksenia Sobchak, who met the head of the department of Vasily Yakemenko dining in the restaurant" Mario "," The most expensive restaurant of Moscow ", as Sobchak itself called this place," as it was called " I painted this collision of Gazeta.ru.

Even such a quote from the letter is given: "According to Article 152.1 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation" Protection of the image of a citizen ": the publication and further use of the image of a citizen (including his photographs, as well as a video or a work of fine art in which he is depicted) is allowed only with the consent of this citizen." This is interesting and in itself, because then, it turns out, in court, for example, you can’t even make sketches of the process - well, as in America. But, of course, to climb into the Civil Code and see what is written and what conditions are surrounded, laziness.

Moreover, in the legal department of the Echo of Moscow decided that since Yakemenko is an official, then the placement of the video does not violate any rights and interests. Sobchak herself in an interview with Metro said a little differently : “I didn’t burst home to it. The restaurant is a public place under our legislation. There is a photo and video shooting. According to the Law of the Russian Federation, a person falls into personal space, passing the threshold of his personal property.”

The fact of innocence is, of course, in the very spread of this letter. Because well, placed a video and placed. Private behavior Sobchak and Yakemenko, their affairs, because life is difficult and everyone understands everything, otherwise. Everything would have been faded. But the fact of sending the letter provides the video with an additional PR and extends its functioning not on the benefit of the Rosmolodezh. Moreover, by this letter, Rosmolodezhi publicly admits that Yakemenko ate something wrong or there. After all, the requirement to remove the video does not contain a refutation of the fact itself?

But there is also a bonus. Since this simple-mindedness is so simple-minded that somehow it wasn’t even to imagine, there was a logical version that it was Yakemenko’s enemies that were being a story, composing this fake and sending it through the media. And yes-in the sense, nothing of the kind: the fact that the letter really exists confirms the Metro : Ksenia Sobchak caught the head of the Rosmolodezh in the most expensive restaurant in Moscow and posted a fragment of the video on the network. Later, Anna Biryukova, spokeswoman for Rosmolozhov. Well, it’s just some kind of control call in your own boss.

The second case of simple -mindedness against this background looks somehow painful, that is, human. In general, such stories should occur on Mondays. In gloomy morning, so at 7.30 hours. That is, the morning was really gloomy and early. But still Turnic.

It was reported like this : “Moscow. October 25. Interfax.ru - the metropolitan police are looking for Sergey Udaltsov, who disappeared from the hospital, where he was delivered early in the morning from the police department, Interfax told the press service of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia in Moscow. On Tuesday, at about 5 a.m., citizen Udaltsov once again staged that he was allegedly ill, after which he was poorly caused Ambulance that took him to the hospital, ”the press service said. In the morning, according to police, Udaltsov arbitrarily left the medical institution. "The Moscow police are taking all measures in order to establish the whereabouts of S. Udalsov, to detain and deliver to court," the press service said. "

The background there is this: Udaltsov was detained on October 24 during the action near the CEC building, where activists wanted to arrange a series of pickets. In the police department, where Udaltsov was left for the night, he complained about the pain in the kidneys. At about five in the morning he was taken to the 68th city hospital. Well, and now ... the main thing is that it is not clear: with what kind of joy of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs is in a hurry to Interfax in order to notify the whole state about the specific, albeit small, but Epic Feile? Well, okay, all Muscovites and guests of the capital would have been called to look carefully at passers -by, given the social danger of the fugitive, but not. Just some complaint about how they were offended.

In general, this story would be enough. However, Udaltsov was also found. That is, it somehowdid not disappear at all : “I don’t know where they lost me. I am in the hospital, where in the morning certain procedures have already passed ... This is some kind of paranoia,” he said to the same Interfax. As for paranoia, he, nevertheless, in vain, immediately just a household picture: early gloomy morning, daring the doctors took somewhere. The convoy (well, probably the convoy, once brought the arrested) thought about his own, woke up-no Udaltsov ... Everything is humanly clear. And maybe really disappeared. But just why immediately call Interfax?

The third case of innocence has a European -Russian character, that is, it cannot be considered purely simple -mindedness, because there is a specific stylistic mismatch of the parties, entailing quite ambiguous consequences. There, at the place of production of simple-mindedness of this type, all this is just a routine, some kind of inhuman in principle. In short, the question of money from Allah.

The bottom line is that the German television channel MDR will transfer to "reporters without borders" the fees of artists of the ballet troupe received for performance in Grozny. The channel is afraid that participation in the concert will damage the reputation of MDR. That is, they are not even afraid, but specifically: Udo Reiter (while the Channel Cector Director) emphasized that the performance of German artists in Grozny cannot be justified and that it caused the damage to the reputation of both the troupe itself and the TV channel as a whole. "Because" the international community has more than once criticized the Chechen leader for gross violations of human rights. "Actually, it is curious: why exactly, why exactly. "Reporters without borders" will be given a fee?

That is, it is clear how the individual organization specifically solves its own problems. Well, they have it like this, but at the same time they substitute everyone else on a blue eye. There was not only this ballet, but also Van Damm, Hillary Suonk, Vanessa May, etc. Well, well, Sunok also stated that she would give a fee somewhere, but what to do to the rest?

But the matter is long, it was October 6. Everything has already forgotten everything. And now the research of the one who was still there may begin again. And there, by the way, there were domestic artists. And everyone had their own motives, what - now they are offered to behave in an inherent way? So some could correlate with other people's circumstances.