Translated material
: Old people and young people are not here
There are few women and youth in the lists of candidates for deputies. The old people, however, also decreased compared to 2007. An ideal candidate also lives in Moscow. The sample does not correspond to reality in any way, but indicates inequality in society. The politician is not given to everyone.
The difference between parties, even during the election campaign, can not be discovered by the most trivial mind. No, it is clear that the LDPR - they are “for the Russians”, and “United Russia” along with the election of Moscow - “for life, for people”. However, otherwise the difference is categorically not manifested. The same people, the same faces, leaders are only different.
However, the party members still have specifics. The specifics in the selection of those who are worthy to be a candidate from each particular party in the elections. A comparative analysis of the gender age composition of the candidates does not amaze, but makes it clear who individual parties are guided by and even the political class as a whole.
For example, despite the pride of the “party in power” from the fact that they have a lot of young people, it turns out that the share of candidates under 30 years old on the party list is 5 percent. Young only 31 people in all of almost six hundred list of candidates from the party. This is less than everyone else - the average share of youth in the lists is 13 percent. Even the Communists, traditionally considered “aging”, the share of youth on the list is more at 11 percent. About the same amount of other parties. 10 percent of young people at the Patriots of Russia and Yabloko, 8 for Socialist -Revolutionaries, 17 - at the “right -handed”.
Zhirinovites stand out against this background. The LDPR marked at once 40 percent of youth in the lists. 127 out of 312 candidates for deputies from the party did not reach a thirty -year mark.
In approximately the same way (only extremums are absent), the gender composition of the lists also looks - it is difficult to find women there. From 15 to 20 percent of candidates for all parties are women. Only in Yabloko this bar is slightly higher - 24 percent.
Parties as a whole are guided by older people. Moreover, both in their rhetoric (protect pensioners), and with the nomination of candidates. 35 percent of pensioners and people of pre -retirement age are found in the lists of three parties at once - “United Russia”, “Patriots” and “Yabloko”. More candidates over 55 years old only for the Communists - there are almost half of them - 45 five percent of the listers. The Communist Party, thus completely confirms the status of the "oldest party of the country."
The “fair Russia” of the “old people” is smaller-25 percent, the great-breeders-12. The record holder is again the LDPR-only 3 percent of the party candidates-this is 12 people-over 55 years old (one of them, however, Vladimir Volfovich Zhirinovsky himself.
Compared to the past elections, there is a tendency to equalize the composition of the participants in the lists of parties. Unless there are approximately the same women. But the share of youth has increased sharply. The LDPR at all at all at all - from 4 percent in the last elections up to 40 in these. A sharp rejuvenation of the LDPR is reflected in the rhetoric of the party. In her brochures and performances of party members, events are repeatedly commemorated in Manezhnaya Square in Moscow, and indeed the bet is on popular nationalist ideas among young people.
The share of youth in general in past elections was close to zero. United Russia, say, young people had 4 percent of the list (but half the “pensioners”). The list of Socialist Revolutionaries was very old - in the last elections of people over 55, there were less than 15 percent in the lists from them.
The regional representative office also does not reflect the average Russian statistics. The share of Muscovites among the parties entering lists is significantly more than the share of Muscovites in the country's common population. The record belongs to United Russia in whose lists there are almost a third of the candidates with Moscow registration.
Considering that more than half of the seats in the State Duma will be occupied by its representatives, there is no doubt that Moscow will be represented by a huge number of deputies in parliament.
For other parties, the share of Muscovites in the lists does not exceed 19 percent (which is also higher than the share of Moscow in the country's population) and only the Patriots and Zhirinovites in the lists are approximately corresponding to the capital of the capital to the common population of 7 and 12 percent, respectively.
Even taking into account the fact that only 15 percent of three thousand candidates will receive mandates, it can be assumed that this image will be the image of a deputy of the parliament. And even wider - the policy of modern Russia. Surprisingly, it is precisely to this voter - not a young and not an old man from a large city that the party practically does not turn. Candidates, as it were, urge not to vote for themselves.
Slices in the lists compared to the “normal distribution”, of course, do not indicate the effectiveness of the future parliament. But exactly indicate the degree of equality of various citizens in Russian society. You can confidently state - this degree is small, and the gap between individual groups, on the contrary, is menacingly great. It is pleasing at least that in the lists of the “party in power” there are fewer older people. This means that the hope for the natural rejuvenation of the political class, despite the threat of a new “stagnation” after Vladimir Putin’s return to the presidential post, is preserved. Otherwise, young Zhirinovites and guys from Manezhnaya Square will say their word.