In the opposition

Navalny - my president

December 19, 2011 Julia Latynina

Leonid Radzikhovsky published on Echo a program post that, they say, Putin is bad - but, besides him, no one! The whole field is cleaned! Especially went to Alexei Navalny.

“According to the degree of unknown, surprise, the validity of their phenomenon to the people, Navalny is not similar to Putin-Medvedev, but with False Dmitry,” writes Radzikhovsky.

Usually I do not polemize with Mr. Radzikhovsky. But information about the panic of the Thursday meeting with Mr. Surkov on the topic “What to do with the opposition” with the participation of Mr. Radzikhovsky forces me to perceive this text not as a personal statement by Radzikhovsky. And as propaganda for smart ones. For idiots there will be all sorts of Kandelaki-Mineevs-“Better-Putin-Putin”, and for the smart Radzikhovsky will be “Putin-Slokho-AVE-POLE-POSISSIAL”, “ONE-NOT-COOTHI-CONTRICATION”, “Someone-TOTOTOT-LAVAL”?

“Suppose Navalny scored these signatures. And - chose?! The President of Russia for 6 years, with almost unlimited powers, was elected a man ... About which nothing is known about! ” - writes Radzikhovsky.

Ah, what a passage! Blogger Navalny - horror, think only - there is no qualification for government!

And what exactly should Navalny have a qualification?

Deputy Head of ZhEK? So where is the housing office, and where is the Kremlin? Minister? Deputy Prime Minister? So, after all, it is built into the system, Putin's henchman.

Where and in what kind of continuing education courses should, according to Radzikhovsky, unlearn Navalny? Can you tell me where there is a school president in the world, which is not hired without diplomas? And how, from the point of view of Radzikhovsky, does Curriculum Vitae look in this sense of other world leaders?

Peter I - a non -boring boy who plays soldiers and hides with representatives of the rotten West, hates everything Russian. Is he, the frantic, to be the head of Russia instead of the sedate and sophisticated Princess Sophia? Catherine II - Are you fucked up? What is this Froilyain, who until the age of 16 did not know the word in Russian, understands in Russia?

George Washington? This tobacco planter? Is it not clear that this slave owner, who has no slightest military and administrative experience, got involved in the war against legal authorities only because it forbade the speculation of Indian lands? James Madison? Well, well. What is this blogger, an expert on Hebrew and ancient Greek, understands in politics? Writing in the federal federal lines does not mean to be president!

David Ben-Gurion? Do not laugh my slippers! Is it possible to create an Israel state from the Polish-Russian hinterland? Its level is to collect oranges and kill Arabs! Lee kuan yu? Ha ha! Would he be president of Singapore? What did he do before the election? Speculated alcohol during the Japanese occupation and defended criminals who cut British officers in court?

I can continue this list to infinity, but I hope, I hope: about each head of state we can say that he was no one, until he became the head of state. There is an exam for the right to steer by a car, but there is no exam for the right to steer by the state. The passage of such an exam is the presidency itself. Many do not pass. The dictator, in fact, is one who remains anyone, even becoming the head of state. And the statesman is the one who ceases to be anyone.

That's the danger to Surkov that Navalny is not nobody. Not marginal lemons. Not a charming playboy of Nemtsov. Not Misha is “two percent”, which, of course, is better than Vova-“ninety-eight”, but excludes deep reforms and iron will.

He is a technocrat and manager, a typical expression of the views of the Russian third estate. He earned money himself. He works with the team, and this team is not engaged in an artistic whistle, but by deed: he fights with this state in the courts and sets up documents much more attentive than those idiots and thieves that wrote them.

He forced to work for half the Russian Internet and, without participating in this Duma campaign, built his strategy so that every voice, given to the Communist Party and LDPR, turned out to be a voice cast for Navalny's strategy. He managed to become a politician, not turning into a marginal, which is, in principle, it is impossible in Putin's Russia. Its "Rospil" is the first successful political business in Russia. He pays his team a salary and pays for himself at the expense of voluntary donations, and not through unknown sponsors.

Do you say that Navalny does not have a program? There is not to steal. This is a necessary and sufficient condition. I do not like the programs in which citizens are prescribed what to do. I like programs in which some things are prohibited. For example, “do not kill”, “do not steal”, etc., and everything else is a matter of free will of citizens. Well, which program of Navalny could offer, in your opinion, for a hypothetical mass voter? Pensioners - raised, mothers - will we allocate? And how would he differ from Putin-Zhirik-Mironov after that?

I raise a glove thrown by Mr. Radzikhovsky, and I declare: I, Julia Latynina, would vote for the President of Navalny. And she would go to Square for President Navalny. Navalny is my president.

Does this mean that Navalny will become Russian Saakashvili? Not at all, there are ten Bakiyevs and a couple of donkeys like Yushchenko in the world in the world. Nothing happens so simple and does not cost the country as expensive as the transformation of the popularly elected president into a dictator. And it is very possible that if Navalny becomes president, then the author of these lines will still cry from Navalny President and will curse his enthusiasm three times. So what? Sitting under Putin, because - imagine - Radzikhovsky said that it could be even worse! What if this Navalny will eat? Can you guarantee that he will not eat children?!

Happy is that country that does not need a leader (at least put at least a ram, the United States will remain). The things that need the leader need bad things. But the cold political reality lies in the fact that in Russia (unlike the United States already mentioned), public soil is so impoverished and washed, the elite has been so decomposed, the people are so lumpen that no reforms are carried out without absolutely iron political will and team of like -minded people. This is like in Georgia: when 80% of the police were dismissed, they, sorry, did not dismiss the people. They were fired by President Saakashvili, who justified the mandate given to him by the people.

Photo by RIA Novosti

And yes, Navalny is the person who can become Russian Saakashvili. Therefore, Surkovskaya propaganda inspires us so fiercely that he is "nobody."