Aluminum colonization

Unusual for the colonization of Africa, Russia begins to catch up with individual businessmen lost in the person.

Recently, a document was published in the Russian Internet media , which was presented as “Analysis and plan of action on the situation at the Frigia plant, Guinea, prepared by Rusal. There were no refutations of the document belonging.

The text is full of sentences of exotic measures:

1.2.1. Within two months to achieve selective arrests of persons involved in the illegal action.

1.2.2. Continue the pressure on the security authorities and the system of justice of the peace to bring investigations in relation to instigators of unrest until the guilty is punished 1.2.3. Carry out measures to replace the prefect of the city of Fri with a loyal official.

1.2.4. To organize measures to withdraw from the post of the Minister of Public Employment M.P. Diallo and the prevention of its election at the head of the Gvinean trade unions.

2.2.1. Contribute to the formation in Guinea of ​​the government loyal to the company and Russia

2.2.2. To organize a continuous removal of information in the Ministry of Security, the General Staff of the National Gendarmerie, the Ministry of Mine, the Prefecture of the G. Fri, the prime minister and the president for the purpose of “for advance”.

In the diplomatic language, all this is called rude interference in the affairs of the sovereign state. At the same time, the authors of the document actually admit that to build trusting, working relations with either the local public, or with trade unions, or with ecologists, or with authorities: it was not possible:

We are not talking about abstract interest in obtaining control over this African country. In 2002, Oleg Deripaska bought Oleg Deripaska, the Frigia clay enterprise in Guinea and the buxite “Boxing company Kindia” (KBK). The plant was first leased for 22 years, and in 2006 was privatized for $ 19 million. Experts evaluated its market value by an order of magnitude more, and the presence of such a difference could not but lead to attempts to eliminate injustice.

These attempts were also provoked by an idea of ​​the lack of social investment of the company. As a result, strikes and demonstrations of the local population, dissatisfied with both working conditions and environmental pollution. As a result, a conflict with the country's leadership, trade unions, the police and so on.

To date, several military coups have occurred in the country, some of which are suspected by Russian aluminum holding, and the Palace of the President of the country Alfa Conde, who once refused to accept Oleg Deripaska, unknown persons fired from grenade launchers.

“There is no normal relationship with any power structure, nor with the trade union, or with the Ministry of Labor, or with the Prefect and the Governor. Mutually beneficial working relations and cooperation with PM and the President are not built. There are no tools for influencing the political situation and personnel decisions of the authorities, ” the document reports.

In Guinea, many decades, with the support of the USSR, developed under the slogans of anti -imperialism, the fight against colonialism and neocolonialism, new Russia can begin to perceive through the prism of Rusal in the context of the enemy’s image described by Soviet propaganda. Moreover, with scandals around the Russian company in the event of another exacerbation, Russian diplomacy will have to be dealt with.

We publish a scandalous document

Analysis and plan of action on the situation at the Frigia plant, Guinea.

Analysis of the situation.

Root reasons.

1.1. Socio-political situation and staff. All Guineans (power, population and workers) do not consider the mermaal to be the owner of the enterprise, including because of the “black PR” against Rusal in local media during the period of judicial disputes on the issue of the privatization of the FRIA. There are no loyal local employees, partial loyalty is mainly based on material incentives. There are plants of the plant. By virtue of the patriarchal-clan structure of society, even the most loyal Guineans tend to support other Guineans with action or passive inaction, even if this contradicts the interests of the Rusal. There are no normal relationships with the Guineans (with all groups of staff, population, power). The ambitions of Guinean employees are not taken into account .. There is a shortage of management tools. In addition to economic incentives that work far from always, we do not have the possibility of dismissal / movements and other tools. Main: there is no policy regarding the formation of a loyal rusal of a modern educated pro-Russian elite at a factory from among local residents, there is no policy regarding the creation of such an elite, including training, career growth

1.2. Power. There is no normal relationship with any power structure, nor with the trade union, nor with the Ministry of Labor, or with the Prefect and the Governor. Mutually beneficial working relations and cooperation with PM and the President are not built. There are no tools for influencing the political situation and personnel decisions of the authorities. The main thing: we are hostages of the domestic political situation in the country, we act as a “bargaining coin” even in situations that are not directly related to the plant.

1.3. Safety. The multifunctional full -fledged security system (personal security of employees, asset safety, economic security, work with state bodies, etc.), in addition to the function of collecting information and internal regulations for expats on behavior, evacuation procedure, has not been built. Main: there is no working security service.

1.4. The results of past errors. The creation of EMF, the lack of actions on the Diano-Dian project, the high cost and transfer price, excess and low qualifications of expans, when the Gwineans are often more qualified, the lack of interaction between expans with the lower link, the language barrier and intercultural contradictions and the contradictions between the lifestyle of Russian-language expans and Guineans.

Direct reasons.

2.1. Underestimated the factor of unofficial trade unions. They relied in the assessment of the situation on official trade unions, which were evaluated as loyal, but in fact they also did not turn out to be.

2.2. They could not stop the illegal actions to stop the plant - the security system (PFA, gendarmes) did not work at the very beginning, when everything could be painlessly extinguished. Gvini security forces in fact took the position of neutrality.

2.3. They could not quickly clarify and form loyalty to Rusal with residents of G. Fri.

Action plan.

1. Medium -term action program.

1.1. Actions in the field of personnel management and stabilization of the socio-political situation at the factory.

1.1.1. Make a replacement for the Director for HR (P.ovchinnikov, Y. Itskov, until 05/21/2010)

1.1.2. Consider the replacement of the General Director of the plant V. Kryuchkov with Kadyrov River, the director of technology (Blut. Ovchinnikov, Ya.Itskov, until 1.05.2010).

1.1.3. Create a joint commission on the analysis of the situation with an illegal strike at the plant, which will include representatives of the labor inspectorate, military adviser, representatives of prefecture, trade unions, gwinera managers, led by Alasan BA, and expansion managers.

1.1.4. To coordinate and sign a tripartite protocol (government, trade unions, enterprise) with an assessment of the illegality of events and principles of interaction for the perspective in order to prevent such conflicts (ed. G. Vlasov, E. Kropocheva, until 04/26/2010) ..

1.1.5. According to Alasan, to perform a two-way combination with the withdrawal of the plant (for example, the director of one of the divisions of Dian Diana) with subsequent dismissal (Ut. Kropocheva, until 1.08.2010)

1.1.6. To evaluate the degree of participation of directors of the railway and thermal power plants (David Baria and David Kamara) in events, to revise their motivation with reference to specific results and loyalty. To decide what we are doing with them in the future. (Ot. Kruchkov, L. Firyan, until 05/05/2010).

1.1.7. Conduct an objective sociological monitoring to assess the situation in the labor collective on a permanent weekly basis (ed. E. Kroopocheva, until 04/28/2010)

1.2. Actions in the field of interaction with power structures.

1.2.1. Within two months, to achieve selective arrests of persons involved in the illegal action (Ot. V. Boyarkin, A. Dedkovsky, until 1.07.20010)

1.2.2. Continue the pressure on the security authorities and the system of justice of the peace to bring investigations in relation to instigators of unrest to the punishment of the perpetrators (Otn.V. Boyarkin, A. Dedkovsky, G. Vlasov, until 1.07.2010).

1.2.3. To carry out measures to replace the prefect of the city of Fri with a loyal official (Ot. V. Boyarkin, A. Dedkovsky, until 1.05.2010).

1.2.4. To organize measures to withdraw from the post of the Minister of Public Employment M.P. Diallo and the prevention of its election at the head of the Gvinean trade unions. (Rescue V. Boyarkin, G. Vlasov, until 1.06.2010)

1.3. Actions in the field of security strengthening.

1.3.1. To coordinate with the Minister of Protection of the President of the allocation and preparation of quick response forces, the involvement of Minister K. Pivi to resolve security issues, the replacement of the gendarmes unit at the factory and the organization of their presence in the city on a rotational basis, attracting informals (group of urban Texplants, 150 people), conduct negotiations with the American group of Morisson, ensuring the safety of objects of objects and individuals) - according to a separate plan (ed., V. Boyarkin, A. Dedkovsky, until 1.05.2010)

2. Long -term action program

2.1. Actions in the field of personnel management and stabilization of the socio-political situation at the factory.

2.1.1. Using the “Production System” tools implemented at the KBK, prepare candidates from the masters and senior masters of Phrygia for the cultivation of the management elite of the plant. Start working with them. (Ot. Vlasov, until 1.07.2010).

2.1.2. To work out the possibility of and evaluate the effectiveness of replacing the management personnel of the plant (including parts of the expature) with qualified personnel of the African countries (Ekovas) and the franchoye -speaking countries (Office I.Itskov, O. Vasilevsky, V. Kryuchkov, Boyarkin) until 1.07.2010).

2.1.3. To develop and present the development strategy of the BGK Phrygia, taking into account local features and an unstable environment in the country (Ot. A. Schmalenko, G. Vlasov, V. Boyarkin, until 1.05.2010).

2.1.4. To dismiss instigators and participants in events in an amount of 15 to 45 people. (Ot. G. Vlasov, V. Boyarkin, A. Dedkovsky, E. Kropocheva, until 07/20/2010)

2.1.5. Constant proactive work with trade unions, informal leaders at the factory, kmams, elders, female and youth organizations of the city of Friya. (Ot. V. Boyarkin, A. Dedkovsky, L. Firyan, R. Kadyrov, The entire period).

2.2. Actions in the field of interaction with power structures

2.2.1. To contribute to the formation in Guinea of ​​the Government Loyal to the Company and Russia (Ot. V. Boyarkin, A. Dedkovsky, the entire period).

2.2.2. To organize a continuous removal of information in the Ministry of Security, the General Staff of the National Gendarmerie, the Ministry of Mine, the Prefecture of the G. Fri, the prime minister and the president for the purpose of “for advance”. (Ob. V. Boyarkin, A. Dedkovsky, G. Vlasov, the entire period).

2.3. Actions in the field of security strengthening.

2.3.1. Modernize the security system that ensures operational

Reaction to attempts to capture the plant. Consider the possibility of creating your own, controlled by Rusal Chop, on the basis of foreigners (sirra-Leon, South Africa, Cubans, etc.). (Ot., V. Boyarkin, A. Dedkovsky, until 1.06.2010)

2.4. Actions in the field of correcting past errors.

2.4.1. To resume the implementation of investment programs (Kindia-2, Dian Diana). (Ot. Y. Itskov, G. Vlasov for the entire period)

2.4.2. Consider the possibility and consequences of taking EMF employees at the plant. (Ot. O. Vasilevsky, until 1.05.2010)