The choice of a large Internet

Almost a week has passed since the beginning of the vote For candidates for the Polit.ru Prize For 2011.

The vote first went, as in "Cinema is not for everyone" or as at the time when the Internet was small and everyone was visible in it. Scientists rushed forward - Gelfand , Oganov and the " initiative group of young scientists." They were a little a little ahead - Dr. Lisa . Accordingly, at that time, there were not so many.

But on the fifth day, the vote reached the people from the big Internet, and then something began to loom. Scientists were left behind, began to vote for the Russians, for Hamatov and Perelman . They soared so far incredibly, because they personify the eternal values ​​- "the charity of orphans" and "put your wealth in one place."

It's nice when you can explain something to people. However, why Khamatova, at 6 (!) Once, overtakes Dr. Lisa, who is the same symbol, I do not know. I can explain, of course. No worse than others in this. But I don't know myself. Is it not so in life?

It is also not very clear for me why people from the big Internet almost do not vote for Karpin - Spartak (30 times less than Khamatova and Perelman), Yuri Shevchuk (30 times less than Khamatova and Perelman), for Roizman (100 times less than Khamatova and Perelman). The rest is more or less clear.

Let's see what will happen in a week.