The presidential candidate (!) and current prime minister (!) spoke to his supporters and declared that:
1. The opposition is preparing throw-ins.
2. The opposition is looking for a “sacred victim” in order to “crash” it and blame the authorities for it. Quote: "...Those you mentioned...are ready to even sacrifice someone themselves and blame the authorities for it....First of all, those who are sitting abroad. I’m telling you exactly this. I know that "
Let me remind you that Vladimir Putin did not meet with the opposition, did not hold any negotiations with it, and did not declare that at least some of the points from the demands of the hundred-thousand-strong rallies would be taken into account by the authorities.
The words of the presidential candidate and the current prime minister should be taken more than seriously, because he was actually talking about an impending criminal offense - murder. Moreover, evidence was mentioned, but it was not presented.
But does the Prime Minister have the right to hide such serious information?
Thus, Putin’s words can be perceived as an announcement of any future unrest, in which the government, in his person, washes its hands in advance and shifts the blame for them to the opposition.
Because “he warned.”
Therefore, despite the fact that society has long been accustomed to Putin’s rhetoric, questions should still be asked:
– In what capacity did Putin pronounce these warnings and threats?
Premiere? Candidate? If it's the prime minister, shouldn't parliament immediately call him for a conversation? If a candidate, then shouldn't Mr. Churov ask Mr. Putin a couple of questions?
– Why does the current Prime Minister Vladimir Putin actually announce unrest, but does nothing to prevent it through peaceful negotiations?
– What do law enforcement agencies think about Vladimir Putin’s statement, no matter how funny this question may sound.
It seems that the experience of fascist Germany, when the Reichstag was set on fire by the authorities to begin repressions against the opposition, should be taken into account by our authorities - everyone remembers how it ended.