In No. 22 dated 02.29.2012 we began a story about how the interests of entrepreneurs, their roofs, thieves in law, top managers of state banks, security forces and ministers came together on a small piece of land near Moscow. The result of a large-scale business woman was a criminal case, and then a conviction against Dmitry Baranovsky, whose surname was now in the so-called “list of political prisoners”. "New" decided to figure out this business.
Dmitry Baranovsky is a businessman, deputy chairman of the Moscow branch of VOOS "Battle Brotherhood" and the human rights organization "Justice".
Peter Katsyv - Minister of Transport of the Moscow Region.
Denis Katsyv is the son of a minister, a businessman.
Alexander Altunin is a former top manager of Sberbank, a participant in the conflict around the land plot.
Alexander Mitusov is the first deputy minister of Katsya, a former deputy prosecutor of the Moscow region.
Natalia Mitusova, Natalya Veselnitskaya - Altunin’s lawyers, whose successful activities in the Moscow region are legends.
Alexander Ksenzhuk is a businessman, the owner of the unfortunate plot of land and LLC Divarers.
Anatoly Starkov is the general director of OJSC TsKAD, who allegedly acted as a negotiator from Altunin -Katsk.
Ushangi Kvashilava and Gela Tserzvadze - according to media reports, are included in the immediate environment of a thief in the law of Tariel Oniani (Tarot); They performed with a petition in favor of Altunin, his business partners in the construction business in Sochi.
Victor Averin (Aver-Sr.) is one of the leaders of the Solntsevo organized crime group, a negotiator from Baranovsky.
Ivan Glukhov - General, Head of the SU State Unitary Enterprise of the Ministry of Internal Affairs in Moscow; The name of the general, like the name of his son, surfaced in a recent scandal with the arrest of Kagansky’s “Resolves”.
A struggle unfolded for a plot of land in the Krasnogorsk district. On the one hand, his new owner Ksenzhuk, who bought a plot along with LLC Divarers (in the load), as well as Baranovsky, who performed on behalf of the Battle Brotherhood, which belonged to 10% of the project, apparently, as a guarantor from unforeseen circumstances. On the other hand, Altunin, who presented the rights to the site, as he had business with his former owners.
There were three fronts in this war. Altunin won with his lawyers ( see “Actors” ). On the second - criminal - the parties limited themselves to positional battles. But on the Public Front, open Baranovsky, managed to develop the offensive: Altunin stopped working in Sberbank, and Katskov began to be inclined in anti -corruption public investigations. In addition to the history of Divarers LLC, he was also remembered by the scandal around OJSC Experienced Plant Stroydormash. Which, probably, was the main tactical mistake of the "social activists." Baranovsky was arrested, accused of extortion and sentenced to 12 years in a maximum regime.

In Soviet times, the Stroydormash Scientific and Production Association was one of the flagships for the production of service details for road-building equipment. But with the collapse of the Union, the plant reproduced its activities - he took up the release of high pressure and brake pads. During the privatization of NGOs, they divided the two legal entities: the AOZT “Experienced Plant“ Stroydormash ”(hereinafter-Lake) and AOZT“ Moscow Design and Technological Institute of Construction and Road Engineering ”Stroydormash (hereinafter-MPTI). The plant continued production activities, but MPTI took up the Domkomovski business - he leased his areas for office premises. In 1997, the family bought 50.4% of the factory’s shares by the Khimkinsky branch of the Moscow Interregional Commercial Bankolgi Larina.
The son of Larina, Yuri, her deputy for production, recalls that period: “We repaid all debts, went to a positive balance, and began to even make a profit. At one time per quarter, the turnover reached $ 12 million. ” According to the laws of Russian reality, a cost -effective enterprise could not but attract the attention of influential interests.
“Once at the beginning of 2000, the newly -minted Minister of Transport Peter Dmitrievich Katsyv entered my office,” Yuri continues. - Our chairman of the board of directors Efim Kobzan brought him to us. Katsyv came with an interesting commercial offer: I want, he says, to purchase 1.3 hectares for the needs of the ministry - there is an idea to build a government garage. ” The minister was set by the price: 1.25 million dollars. “But Katsyv said that he was ready to buy for 600 thousand dollars, in cash, right now. Of course, we refused - the price is unacceptable, and the form of payment already seemed wild ... Katsyv then only smiled: "There will be problems - come in."
Problems came to the Larin in the person of neighbors - from the building of OJSC "PTI" Stroydormash ". Since 2002, Oleg Kovalkin, who today operates the operational management of several companies of the son of Peter Katzv, Denis, has become the general director of MPTI. “Kovalkin,” Larin continues, “on his first introductory visit to our plant dropped two key phrases: that he is a man of Katzu; that MPTI is going to expand. And we seemed to interfere a little ... "
After some time, according to Larin, the chairman of the board of directors Kobzan began to behave strangely: “He organized business correspondence with his mother, urgently demanding“ share ”a real estate in the amount of 25%.” And at the beginning of 2003, Kovalkin again visited the plant: “He brought several shares purchased by some individuals from the labor collective. I demanded that I amended the registration journal, but I refused: there were violations in the contracts, in accordance with the instructions of the FCCB, we asked them to correct. ”
Then, by proxy, by proxy of new shareholders, he filed a lawsuit in the regional arbitration, and Natalya Veselnitskaya and Natalya Mitusova already known to us have begun to work. The court arrested the register of shareholders and issued a decision on his demand. But it was not possible to implement the sanction, says Yuri Larin: “The magazine was stored in a bank cell, which only had access to the mother.”

Then the unwritten laws of the raider genre were used: an extraordinary meeting of shareholders, the lifting of the general director, the “dismissal” of the owners, the change of the board of directors, and most importantly - the creation of a parallel register of shareholders and the order not to let the Larins family into the territory of the plant.
On the night of March 31 to April 1, 2003, the old shareholders were taken by force - on the threshold of the enterprise was the private security of the Khimkinsky Internal Affairs Directorate, which once became a new service of the plant’s security. The HEVD HIMICOS on a statement by the Larins about criminal encroachment on someone else's property did not respond: they say, there is no criminal case here - sort it out in the arbitration court. The regional prosecutor’s office also showed no attention: all appeals were parafed by the first deputy prosecutor Alexander Mitusov ( we recall that the lawyers Veselnitskaya and Mitusova are his wife and daughter, respectively . - A. S. ). Some time later, Mr. Mitusov unexpectedly discovered in the chair of Deputy Minister Peter Katsk.
As a result, Stroydormash OJSC was re -registered in Kalmykia, its property was sold at broken prices, and the plant was liquidated. While all these metamorphoses took place with Stroydormash OJSC, the owners were actively replaced by the Stroydormash MPTI OJSC, from where the invaders supposedly came.
According to the SPARK, in 2005, the control package of OJSC “Stroydormash” (80.13%) was bought by the son of the Minister of Transport Denis Katsyv and his wife Lyudmila. Next year, Denis sold his package of the Israeli company Martshholdings, which, according to the Ministry of Justice of Israel, belongs to the same offshore of the British Virgin Islands. The owners of the latter are not disclosed, but it is known that his generally Denis Katsyv is generally. The management of the Israeli company abroad is carried out by a certain Alexander Litvak, in Russia - General Director of MPTI Oleg Kovalkin.
In Kalmykia, now former shareholders have lost all courts. “There even a presiding judge said to us there: where did you come - this is not Moscow to you!” - recalls Larin. However, in the cassation instance, the Federal Arbitration Court of the North Caucasus District canceled the previous decisions. From his resolution: “A corporate conflict arose in connection with an attempt to“ unfriendly capture of the enterprise ”. “This is evidenced by the parallel existence of two register of shareholders and two governing bodies, a change in the legal address from the Moscow region to the Republic of Kalmykia, alienation of property, and the liquidation of a legal entity.”
The legal status of the enterprise was restored in 2006, but it was not possible to return the sold property. To launch this process was helped in the MOO “Justice”, says Yuri Larin. “Mothers were offered to seek help in“ justice ” - they said that the organization had extensive experience in the fight against corrupt officials. They helped us. "
On May 15, 2008, the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs for the Central Federal District, according to Olga Larina, opened a criminal case (No. 153141) on the fact of fraud: in the order of operational-search measures, searches were held in the IPTI Stroydormash, which probably seriously alerted the Katsvov family.

And in July, Minister Katsyv went to the second meeting with Baranovsky. Unlike the first, which was organized by State Duma deputy Dmitry Sablin at the request of Baranovsky, the second was personally initiated by Katsyv. The parliamentarian at it was an equally interesting politician-the ex-vice-prime minister of the Moscow region, former Prime Minister of Chechnya, State Duma deputy, and now the presidential envoy in the Volga Federal District, Mikhail Babich. From his testimony: “Panteleev called me ( former vice-governor of the Moscow region. - A. S. ) and suggested urgently to meet. We met in the Katsya office, where he said that there was a certain conflict between him and Baranovsky, asked them to organize a meeting. ”
The meeting place was Crocus City shopping center. “There Katsyv,” Babich testifies, “turning to Baranovsky, began to discuss some criminal case, initiated by the real estate of the plant, which is located in Khimki. Katsyv invited Baranovsky to resolve the conflict existing between them and asked for help in terminating this criminal case. For his part, Katsyv promised to give Baranovsky a land plot in the suburbs and offered to pay three million US dollars per plant. ”
However, Baranovsky, according to Babich, did not go to such conditions: “He said that he was not related to the initiation of a criminal case and that the land plot that was discussed cannot be the subject of bargaining and concessions, since supposedly Katvy’s acquaintances have no legitimate rights to him. <...> Then Katskov asked Baranovsky to assist him in negotiations with the affected owners of the plant. "
From the testimony of Baranovsky: “I told Peter Katskovu:“ Let's invite the appraiser. You want to hire yourself. ” He replied: "Let yours count." From the testimony of Larina: “An independent assessment showed that the cost of the plant for enlarged meters is $ 45 million. Since my family had a little more than half, we designated $ 22.5 million. ” In this regard, the lawyer of Baranovsky Alexei Mikhailenkosa is that the party of Peter Katsk was ready to spend this amount: “In our country, sometimes a criminal case is cheaper than to mutually account with someone.”

On September 30, 2008, a criminal case on the fact of fraud at the factory was closed by the senior investigator of the Mikhailova ATS. True, it was necessary to terminate the case twice - in connection with a “crooked” resolution, some of which more resembled an indictment. For example: “In the courts of Mitusova and Veselnitskaya, they submitted forgery documents, on the basis of which opposite decisions were made in the plant.” Mikhailova sent a written instruction of an employee of the IC of the Ministry of Internal Affairs Alexander Matveev (defendant of the Magnitsky list), which orders to eliminate these “violations”.
And shortly before that, Peter Katsyv sent a statement to the head of the FSB in Moscow and the Moscow Region Viktor Zakharov, in which he reported that representatives of the former owners of Stroydormash OJSC, who demanded a large amount of money for the termination of the investigation of the criminal case, addressed him. ” On the basis of this particular appeal, Baranovsky was put on wiretap, which became a prelude to criminal prosecution of the deputy chairman of the justice.
On March 17, 2009, the son of the Minister of Transport Denis Katsyv met with Baranovsky in the restaurant "Gallery". The conversation was recorded on the recorder.
Dmitry Baranovsky: As for Peter Dmitrievich, I came, honestly told everything, agreed that he would figure it out. And, in fact, I sent to x*th, between us.
Denis Katsyv: Is it offended? Well, honestly. Because of this, the war began?
B.: This did not offend, you just have a refrigerator from your house, and you come humanly and say: can you leave?
K.: Listen, well, he could not influence the situation ... Well, how could he influence? To drive out of the deputy ( obviously, I mean Mitusov. - A. S. ) from work? <...>
B.: You must understand that in this situation there is no such thing that I wage this war. I am simply lit in this story ... I have the feeling that you have some kind of picture there, you look at it and finish something yourself. And it is not true ... People just oh*ate from lawlessness. Did you select something from you? No. They selected people from people.
K.: Well, what were you selected, Dim? Well, who selected? Fat (apparently, does Altunin mean. - A. S. ) selected? Here with fat and understand. Well, where is my own resource or father? Except the brains of these two girls? ( Obviously, this refers to the lawyers Veselnitskaya and Mitusova. - A. S. ). <...> Maybe we will discuss some compromises? We will put our hands on each other, disperse - and that’s it. I'm not calm now. My interests are affected. They tried to take everything away from me, and you tried to erase me from the face of the earth. <...> Now we are talking about me! Without taking me out! .. I did not communicate with these girls at all, although they are sitting in my building ( as the further record will show, Veselnitskaya will meet Katse at the exit from the restaurant. * - *a. S. ). <...>
B.: Look, it means the first: I personally are to resolve. <...> Nobody wants anything except that you give what does not belong to you. <...>
K.: You have already announced twenty -two and a half lemon, b*d, and we are all stopping. I will show you to my father.
B.: No.
K.: Well, how not? You said: 22.5 million, and we all stop. Well, how not?
B.: 51%said. <...> You listen to me to the end. 51% of the society ( OJSC "Stroydormash". - A. S. ) belongs to people ... 51% must be returned to them. <...>
K.: Listen, there is a criminal case that was and proved that we have nothing to do with this x . Dim, let's discuss the issue then, you think that we should now bent Altunin, he must give the site, and after that you can apologize to this topic. Yes? Such a decision or we owe something else, damn it? <...> That is, you think, Bl Du, we must give the “sofarex” a 50% share and still have something to shareholders of Stroydormash? Yes, as I understand it?
B.: It seemed.
K.: It seemed! And the war that you untied should there be no compensation in this situation? That is, they misled respected people. For this, no compensation is needed? <...>
B.: When there was a conversation with Peter (Katsv) and when there were meetings with him, only one thing was said: let's openly agree. <...>
K.: Dim, you negotiated, and the next day the “Justice” X*Yarila articles. Come on honestly. <...> Listen, we are not fighting with the family ( I mean the Larins family. - A. S. ). We are fighting with you because you are a serious guy.
Two months after this meeting, Katskov-Jr., together with Altunin, a statement was written in the Federal Security Service in Moscow and the Moscow Region on "extortion of property by Dmitry Baranovsky under the threat of violence and the spread of defamatory information." From the FSB, the appeal was launched into the Main Investigative Committee of the Ministry of Internal Affairs in the Moscow Region, where criminal case No. 141207 was instituted (subsequently it changed the number by 304540), and then - to the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs in Moscow, where General Ivan Glukhov joined the case. He instructed the investigator Nikolai Kuklin, who called Baranovsky on August 26, 2009 for interrogation, after which he was arrested.
Being already in Lefortovo, Baranovsky described in writing the “new” details of his detention in writing: “I was staged a confrontation with Natalya Veselnitskaya. During the confrontation along the corridor, Denis Katsyv paced, who <...> about something lively <...> talked with operational employees. <...> In the opening of the open door, I saw Katsy and some kind of person in civilian clothes sitting opposite each other. На столе стояла бутылка то ли виски, то ли коньяка. <…> Через несколько часов этот же человек (что пил с Кацывом), еле держась на ногах, ввалился в кабинет следователя Куклина В.Н. <…> и начал требовать, чтобы я поживее задавал свои вопросы и не затягивал следственное действие. <…> выяснилось, что это непосредственный руководитель Куклина — заместитель начальника отдела Романов. Во время перерыва <…> Куклин вернулся в кабинет с парой листков. <…> Куклин снова вышел <…> я быстро перевернул документы <…> и увидел, что это постановление о моем задержании, подписанное Куклиным и согласованное Романовым, еще до окончания очной ставки. Стало понятно, что все происходящее лишь формальность — решение о лишении меня свободы принято заранее.
<…> Уже находясь в СИЗО «Лефортово», я узнал у одного из сотрудников Московского управления ФСБ, который там также содержится, что предшествовало моему задержанию. Оказывается, продавливалось решение непосредственно начальником СЭБ УФСБ по г. М и МО Жигаревым, у которого, в свою очередь, дневали и ночевали Позынюк (сотрудник управления делами Минтранса МО, неофициальный советник по безопасности Петра Кацыва, в прошлом сотрудник центрального аппарата ФСБ РФ) и Алтунин («потерпевший»). Вечером же (в день моего ареста) стало известно, что следователь Куклин не планирует меня задерживать, поскольку не видит для этого правовых оснований. Алтунин примчался к Жигареву, который был на работе. Примерно в 23 часа они стали звонить начальнику ГСУ МВД по г. Москве Глухову, которого подняли с постели. Тот позвонил следователю, подтвердил ему, что по мне принято решение об аресте, и дал ему прямой приказ меня задерживать».
После задержания Барановского оперативники ГСУ провели ряд обысков в МОО «Справедливость», ОАО «Ратеп» и ОАО «Серпуховский завод «Металлист» (миноритарными пакетами акций которых владел Барановский), а группе активистов «Справедливости» предъявили обвинения в создании ОПГ. Каждому отводилась своя роль: бизнесмену Александру Ксенжуку — «предоставление в распоряжение Барановского документов и информации об ООО «Диварекс», члену «Боевого братства» Александру Чижову — «реализация комплекса мер по оказанию психического воздействия на потерпевших», активисту «Справедливости» Руслану Якомазову — «подготовка и проведение митингов», юристам Максиму Рослякову, Андрею Калугину и Андрею Карасеву — «юридическое сопровождение преступной группы в арбитражных процессах», акционеру ОАО «Опытный завод «Стройдормаш» Ольге Лариной — «предоставление в распоряжение организованной группы документов и информации по корпоративно-имущественному конфликту в «Стройдормаше». Адвокат Барановского Алексей Михайленко считает такое обвинительное заключение издевательством: «Это противоправная расправа, когда абсолютно законная деятельность искусственно криминализируется. Тому же Карасеву, защищавшему Ольгу Ларину в арбитражном суде, предъявляют обвинение фактически за его профессиональную деятельность, по которому ему грозит лишение свободы на срок от 7 до 15 лет». Тем не менее часть членов «ОПГ» уже осуждена, а часть — объявлена в федеральный розыск.
В качестве постскриптума. Согласно ЕГРЮЛ, актуальным владельцем ООО «Диварекс» ныне является ООО «Элит Транс групп», 70% долей которой через ООО «ТЕКС» принадлежит теперь Александру Старкову — тому самому «советнику» Петра Кацыва. Все-таки клочок земли под коттеджи нашел своего хозяина… И если из-за подобной малости вспыхивают такие войны, что же происходит при заключении миллиардных сделок?