"The task is not to let Putin go to the Kremlin." On March 5, thousands of dissatisfied with the results of the presidential election entered Pushkinskaya Square, and thousands of activists of pro -Kremlin youth on the manifier. The new turn of the Cold Civil War was followed by The New Times 
Bargain
“I inform that the conduct of a public event ... will require overlapping movement, violate the functioning ... Create an obstacle ... will violate the rights and interests ...” - this standard set of verbs meaning one thing: “To refuse to refuse the promotion,” the leader of the left front, Sergei Udaltsov, saw in a letter on February 24, signed by the head of the department of the city hall, Aleksey Mayorov. “Perhaps this is the last opportunity to gather peacefully on the Moscow streets not under water -fluids and not at the open door of the car,” journalist Sergei Parkhomenko wrote in his fasebook, calling Muscovites to the “Big White Circle” to the Garden Ring: on February 26, more than 30 thousand Muscovites responded to this call. By that time, it was already known: representatives of Rumola and ours won the struggle for the central squares of the city - the former received the right to express their love to Putin in Lubyanka, the latter on Manezhnaya Square (both of them act under the roof of the “headquarters of uniform actions in support of Vladimir Putin”). But the “angry townspeople” did not want to give up: polls conducted on the Echo of Moscow website on Facebook and live magazine Boris Akunin showed: 70% of the respondents said whether they want the authorities or do not want to, but they will go to the Lubyanka - even under the threat of accelerations and arrests.
As is now known, this survey was a joint initiative of the organizing committee of protest actions and the city hall. The “big white circle”, a chain of people holding hands, stretching on 15 km of the main ring of the capital, obviously made a strong impression: negotiations in the office of the deputy mayor Alexander Gorbenko were going on for three days.
Compromise
On the morning of March 1, loud headlines appeared on news feeds: “The Organizing Committee of the rally“ FOR HERE ELECIALS ”puts the ultimatum: either the Manezhno or the spontaneous rally.” In fact, everything was more complicated, and the now permitted Pushkin Square was one of those compromise options that were discussed at a closed meeting of the Protest Organizing Committee. Its main supporters were one of the leaders of Parnassus Vladimir Ryzhkov and the deputy from Fair Russia Gennady Gudkov. Arguments: You can’t give the authorities a reason to use force - it may like it. The leader of the "solidarity" Boris Nemtsov was inclined to stipulate a compromise with rigid conditions. “The option was considered in which we compromise about March 5, but we link this issue with permission to hold March 8, 9 or 10,” he told The New Times. In principle, the founder of Ros Electors Alexei Navalny agreed with this option, although he was ready to conduct an unauthorized action. “They will never allow us and nothing - this is obvious,” he commented on The New Times his position. “No one says that it is necessary to lead people under the batons, but it is also impossible to retreat endlessly,” Navalny believes, recalling that the authorities did not fulfill a single requirement of previous rallies. “We need to understand the potential of protest,” the leader of the OGF, 13th world chess champion Harry Kasparov, calculates the moves. - For the next stage, you need to prepare well. Our strategy: shares should grow, become more intense and numerous. Purpose: May 7, on the day of the inauguration, to take half a million people to the streets and simply do not let Putin go to the Kremlin. ” Surprisingly, Sergey Udaltsov was also considered implacable as an implacable supporter. "
The solution was found when the head of the capital's Central Internal Affairs Directorate, General Vladimir Kolokoltsev, arrived on Tverskaya 13 and proposed a compromise option: Pushkinskaya Square
“With this, they came to the city hall on March 1. The authorities were represented at the negotiations by Vice-mayor Alexander Gorbenko and two leaders of the Security Department-Alexei Mayorov and Vasily Oleinik. From the side of the organizing committee-Sergey and Anastasia Udaltsova, Vladimir Ryzhkov and Sergey Parkhomenko. First, the parties habitually came to a dead end, then discussed possible alternatives: Pushkin’s and triumphant squares, but both of them They could not accommodate everyone in the office and the head of the Central Internal Affairs Directorate General Kolokoltsev entered with his proposal: the main platform is Pushkinskaya Square and the streets adjacent to it (calculations show that this space is about 30 thousand people), and if there are a lot of people, the police are ready to block Tverskaya Street: so that they are involved Square and Tver Boulevard.
“The option is compromised and not bad,” Udaltsov says. - I am not a supporter of confrontation - this will give power the reason to use force. Is the society ready for a street war? There is always 50 to 50 - you will never guess. ” At the time of signing the number in the printing of the opposition, there was also the White Circle-2 action-only on the sidewalks around the Kremlin, which were called to protect the commissars of “ours”.
Ours to you
The New Times has already written : the Prochrevsky youth movements are again recruited into their ranks of football fans and unemployed youth from the province for power pressure on the non -systemic opposition * * The New Times wrote in detail about this in No. 5 of February 13, 2012. Football fans were already seen on the Square of the Revolution, March 5 - on the Lubyanka and March - on the Lubyank Pushkin Square will be at all subsequent protests. According to The New Times, the price of exiting the street with a brand - from $ 100 to $ 300 to each.
Immediately after the action “Sales of the Political Winter” (then, on the last day of Shrovetide, after the “White Circle” campaign ended, Udaltsov with colleagues came to the Revolution Square and even made a short speech) organized by the Left Front on February 26, a message appeared on the signature of the Commissioner Maria Kislitsyna: “Ours and Stal’s movements did not allow me to conduct An unauthorized action on the Revolution Square in Moscow, thereby preventing possible provocations and violations of the law. We want to remind the representatives of the Russian opposition and their patrons that we will not sit back if they violate the laws of the Russian Federation or try to destabilize the situation in the country. ” Member of the Public Chamber and the leader of Russia Young Maxim Mishchenko was more frank: “On the Orange Revolution Square, they wanted to launch a premiere’s doll on white balls,” he wrote on Facebook. - They burst the balls, and they took the doll. Sadness ". 
The regulars of the protest actions of some of the attackers quickly identified. Someone was high as a certain Dmitry Vakulenko from the "Local" movement. His profile on Facebook says for himself: “Education is a secondary specialist” (this, however, also says that in the posts of a young man there are almost no proposals without gross spelling errors), “Television-news on the first”, “Passion-sports, military-applied subjects”, “Favorite quote-we’ll encounter the angle”. "
The attackers took out knives for cutting papers and really began to burst balls. The New Times correspondent, one of them affectionately poked a knife in a jacket with the words: "Enough"
“Together with him, as the New Times, the co -footing in the“ near -football ”movement, told the Square, fighters from the Tula group of CSKA called the Provincial Family, which has established itself in fights with fans of enemy clubs“ from the best side ”. Their leader, Evgeny“ Chemist ”does not hide his connections with Vasily Yakemenko. Another participants in the latest provocations and attacks on the opposition are the “fragments” of the N-Trips group (the association of Moscow football fans, which gained fame on the Internet thanks to endless fights several years ago and now decayed). It was the commissars of “our” and “local”. What are us? We never loved all this liberal-communist trash. And here is an extra training and earnings. ” According to him, everyone who agreed to law enforcement officers assured that in case of “misunderstandings with the police” or detention the problems would be resolved - even if the police find a brass knuckle or a traumatic gun. “Yes, we have not been detained yet,” the interlocutor concluded.
Symmetric answer
The opposition, in turn, states that it is ready for any power pressure. According to the leaders of the protest movement, even if the “nurses” fulfill the promise to take each time to the streets, in contrast to the opposition, up to 20 thousand people, they have enough strength to repulse them. Ilya Yashin from the Solidarity movement assured The New Times that “there has been so much accumulated experience in the experience of all kinds of attacks in recent years that we have nothing to fear. We organized safety even on a 120,000-thousand-thousand-end action on Sakharov Avenue and, despite the fact that the provocateurs who tried to arrange a mass fight and disrupted the rally, we coped with abundance. We will cope in the future. We have our own combatants and volunteers who are ready to identify provocateurs and withdraw them from the places of promotions. We will also coordinate actions with representatives of the left forces and moderate nationalists. In general, there is enough resources. In addition, our advantage over the “nurses” is that we initially do not count on the police. ”
Sergey Udaltsov also believes that in a power confrontation with the opposition, representatives of the Prochrevsky movements have nothing to catch. “We have long have our own security structure,” said Udaltsov The New Times. - In connection with the latest events, it is only worshiped. We are ready to answer any violence. I want to emphasize at the same time: we will never attack the first. But if someone attacks us, let him know that he will not be too smoothly. Of course, if the authorities begin to shoot at us or catch one in the porches and cripple - here we will not be able to protect ourselves. But I sincerely believe that such lawlessness will not reach. "
Rogozin on the Don
