Act of sociologophobia

Sociologophobia arose as a result of the author’s dissatisfaction with the activities of sociologists: why did they not explain what the basis of the civil activity of recent months was at the basis of? That is, what did the participants themselves expect from her - well, without what was on their posters and in speech?

The question does not aim to evaluate the prospects of further mass activity, but we must finally find out what is happening here at all. And the main thing in this case is precisely the expectations of participants in the historical process. And such expectations, and those who are waiting, because they want it and - what they fear undesirable). I would like to have such an alchemical card of the brain where it is drawn in zones, where what expectation, well, is the main zone that makes everyone move the minds and write down the thoughts that arose from this rustling. And why else in the world sociologists, if not to draw such pictures?

Well, yes, they investigated the social, educational and property composition of the participants in rallies. But what were the expectations? Such studies are not visible. Moreover, the educational and age position could be understood even without hundreds of polls, indirect evidence is full.

Culture

Did, for example, civic activity attitude towards culture? More precisely, was there a kind of cultural space to the place where expectations arose? Culture here is not in the sense of something beautiful and correct that every advanced one should know, but as a long structure that exists and is increasing. At the same time, the use of the word "culture" does not mean that everything is always in order with it and - you will a little adapting it to the matter, as well as everything is also all right. Exactly in this story, her role was secondary, she was not lucky at all. For example, before the rallies of the word "Putin" on its territory was not - it is on another part, this is not its area. And now he is already there, he was brought there on the process, who, without his mention, could not live a day. Well, here the culture has no resources that allow you to keep their environment, displacing everything that has nothing to do with it? Well, then no. But, of course, someone exactly in moving Putin there is a progress.

But the "creative class" in general has nothing to do with culture. The most visual evidence: the agitation about I. Prokhorova - now, the creative class learned about its existence ... Here, even with a household culture, the inconsistent: what, in fact, was the society so struck by society? She was relatively injected by Mikhalkov, although he would hardly agree with such an interpretation, he spoke in his life. Rather, society excited a certain shift from a regular body format. Ergo, television format the public knows well. This is not a fundamentally new "network class", but all the same viewers.

Exactly about the same member of the organizing committee Yu.Saprykin : " Irina Prokhorova, director of a small publishing house " - to determine UFO as a "small publishing house", this is strong for the intellectual, yes. Well, the “director”, of course, is clearer to his audience than the “editor -in -chief”. At the same time, it doesn’t matter what is the history of Saprykin himself - it is also correlated with the ideas (and stylistic) of his audience. It must be prescribed, he is ready to call it a "creative class", and he himself is not obliged to have a relationship with culture, it is as a youth animator - care in bringing them relevant trends.

Age

Immediately the second sociological topic: the age of the participants in rallies. There was no sense in his measurement either, since they all read youth publications and behaved, as said there. Age, that is, was general, youth. In general, curious, but a lot of media remains for adults? Well, or the same industry, or something - where a more or less long -term culture lies. This, of course, is a question that is not related to business. With massive expectations, it is simpler and more inventory. Although you can’t understand which, in general, in this way, waiting is possible. Again, the same age: as soon as the revitalization had the appearance of mass rejuvenation, then who could share whose expectations could share or they had the same for everyone? The natural phenomenon is then, which.

However, on this occasion, a compromise was drawn in January, more precisely, an interaction scheme. At the Polit.ru seminar about the revitalization of politics, Olga Romanov, referring to the young people who were present there, directly and unpleasantly (with respect to other people) said that " this is your time, this is your riot, no matter how good old farts on the rostrum, they have already missed their chance ." Well, there was somewhat more specific than "missed." And then purely humility is already: " And somehow I want to do something so that you accept us, and not vice versa ."

This position is separated by the second side. A little later, the bewilderment of L.S. Rubinstein, who quoted in his FB, as they wrote something like this: "Thank you for supporting us." That is, it turns out that “they“ supported ”them, and the“ they ”themselves are never actors of the historical process. All this middle-aged society, together with L.S. Rubinstein, is only approving with something “to him” from the side of the historical process.

But L.S. Rubinstein can be congratulated: in the end, he interrupted a long period of his poetic inactivity, now writing a poem. Here it is:
" You ask the electorate
Is he ready for everything -
Both for shame and slaughter.
And on the "on the wall of the head".
Both on the sum, and to the prison.
And he really believes him "to him."
The electorate will answer you:
"I myself
I myself
I myself
Xia is glad! "

So all this should be arranged already in order to ensure that L.S. Rubinstein return to poetry. But only such a result could not be the initial expectation, who could have suggested?!

Format

The above facts should not include to conclude that all this was a purely pastime with children's expressions on their faces. It's just a good format. And when following the format of expectations, there can be no one, there is the only emotion - to match it.

But with illusions - otherwise. Unlike expectations, they definitely exist, and this is the most interesting. The format does not know expectations, and illusions envelop it with a certain cloud of humanity. Illusions are not obliged to correspond to the historical moment, but the person who has betrayed it feels an important part of the universe - and this is the case when the illusion without the slightest obstacles becomes a fact of life.

That is, it is in private life everything is so beautiful, in the public it is no longer quite. Illusions are made an integral part of the common worldview: we should be as we want. This is just a writer of Moneyzhin with an opus "Give me!" -7-8 years ago, there was such a proto-project for the arrangement of a new generation through violent promotion of young types of authors.

But what exactly are "give"? Here, there is a general revival and what does it want? The fact that it is honest elections or Zyuganov that cannot be believed. Sociologists have not found out expectations, that’s the whole problem. Well, yes, the requirements were read out at the events, but it does not mean to wait, but wait does not mean at all that you are waiting for exactly what you want. There was no pragmatic -political revival - no one practically noticed the same municipal elections, the deputies were not promoted by the list.

The topic of self -determination and other self -identification, as well as self -esteem and respect from the authorities, is as much as you like. This is a normal course of things that are preceded by identification vibrants. It is equally natural that the consequence will be self-election, when on the one hand there are beautiful, and on the other-oh-oh. But here you can put a sociological dump: a person for self -determination requires the attitude of power to him. So it is arranged in this territory and what kind of culture there is without Putin. But sociologists would tell what expectations are on average in the ward, then everything would become constructive and, perhaps, would have done without involving a vertical of power to the matter.

Cognition

There was also a theme of video cameras as a means that carried out a session of a small knowledge of the country that was visible in them. For the first time, there is no talk of special knowledge, this is only to understand what is there at all, there is nothing to compare with. The same thing is about the elections: how to understand how it is now - this happens usually or vice versa - this time is still decent, but before everything was drawn at all? Yes, the process of cognition, including unpleasant details - here, some people in untidy black almost under protection lead either to sections, or to rallies. Violations are not violations, but a specific touch of the fact that there are such people in the country in an untidy dark one and there seems to be a lot of them.

Accordingly, the topic of the elections was educational. Because the abstract: no protection of his candidate (due to the absence of them), only a general approach such as the requirements of recalculation or ideas of the second round. That is, the secondary details in the absence of a specific meaning - quite to the specific - these requirements. It turned out an interesting thing, civil activity wished a certain procedure in clean space. A sort of spherical democratic procedure in vacuum (in the absence of represented political interests). Of course, this is an educational process and it is interesting that even the election procedure can be an abstraction: although, by logic, how can it exist without specific interests in this field?

This turned out to be successfully. To understand the election mechanics, they must be crooked. This is like an unfamiliar sport you better understand when the athletes are bad. Say, the Cup of six nations - there, with ignorance, the rugby looks just like actions according to the scenario, where everything happens in the only way - and not understand what the essence of the matter is. When they play medium or bad - then it is clear what they have problems and, at the same time, what is the essence of the game. What needs to be done, what was meant and why it did not work out. Everything turned out to be appropriate with the elections.

But only there is another point. The elections were studied what they should be, but here they had a different meaning. These falsifications, violations, other options for using the administrative resource. There is also a pathos in order to throw more percent and do it more inconspicuous. On the contrary, the demonstration of the admin resource is the main meaning of the elections for the authorities: they demonstrate the resources precisely then to report that they are still power. They will give the command - it will be completed, even with excessive diligence. In the elections, they show not some voices, but the fact of management. More violations - more evidence that the power is governing, will manage and everything will be built. Therefore, the educational program was related to universal theory, and not to local practice. What to do with this acquired experience?

So or this way

As a result, everything is clinging to the eternal question: what is primary here and what is secondary? A certain change in the mental state of a certain group of people coincided with the elections, having made a desire (most obvious) to correlate the changes in this fact? Or vice versa, the elections and related circumstances made this change in the mental state of the group? Well, about that: sociologists did not collect expectations, did not voiced them (so that those who, without expectations, could choose themselves). Therefore, do not answer the question. But what if the basic occasion remained unknown?

There is still a chance, they are already doing this. For example, the emergence of a group of "NII rallies" (independent research initiative) was announced . According to the announcement, the group " took on the task of understanding what has been happening in Russia since the beginning of December - from the very beginning this interest was focused not on changes in the political field, but on changes in society ." This is Alexander Bikbov.

Everything is approximately correlated there with what the complaints in this note were about: “ Our task is to clarify the meaning of events that are relevant for the protesters themselves ... Far from always the protesters are clearly determined politically, very few go on the streets with a distinct project, with clear goals, with the expectation of specific results of the entire social movement and their own actions. People are looking for the meaning of their participation in the very participation. clarify this with them, fix and explain the diversity and contradictions of what is happening ... "

So far, there is not much one there, but this is not a quick thing. You need to find out about expectations. Maybe then they will arise.