About Shuvalov, Navalny and lack of conscience

The millions earned by the Shuvalov family (I won’t call them stolen for now) keep journalists and bloggers awake every day. Personally, I would calmly pass by it (another showdown between Putin’s and Putin’s with the involvement of the media and hamsters - what’s unusual?!), if not for one fact.

Today, the main fighter against universal evil burst out with an accusatory post in his combat blog. Thunder and lightning struck Shuvalov and the others. There you have: “The reasons for such Kremlin activity are clear: they are not protecting the bribe-taker Shuvalov, who is of no use to anyone and would have been leaked in three seconds. They are protecting two citizens who are the real support and core of the “vertical of power” - those who took these bribes gave."

And: “We have every reason for the Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Government, Deputy Secretary of the Presidium of the General Council of the United Russia party, Igor Ivanovich Shuvalov, to be under investigation for receiving bribes on an especially large scale. Next to him under investigation, and then citizens Abramovich and Usmanov should be in the dock."

And even: “The people involved in the case are completely disgusting from both moral and political points of view. Well, look at this Shuvalov. He not only takes millions in bribes, but also lives in some kind of ostentatious and impudent luxury.”

I read all these bulk thunder and lightning, but my sense of smell told me that they didn’t smell like ozone at all. I start to strain my brain and... bam!!! “According to a source from the Dozhd TV channel, it was Ivlev who published the incriminating evidence against the deputy prime minister in the press, and Alexey Navalny, Ivlev’s lawyer, was offered to take responsibility for the published facts. Navalny could have become the face of this campaign, but he refused .”

Meanwhile, the “Shuvalov case” is one of the few where there are all the documents and evidence. As I wrote above, they were checked by lawyers from the largest business publications in the world and confirmed their authenticity." This is a quote from Navalny’s post.

Conclusion: when there was a real opportunity to expose Shuvalov, to show himself as a fighter against corruption, Alexei Navalny refused. Despite the presence of significant evidence. Why? Ask Navalny a question. However, I am 146 percent sure that he will not answer. The wrestler doesn’t have “who knows what” answers to such questions.

PS While I was writing, I thought. Navalny in the role of a pug is funny.