Three ambivalence of Tuesday

There are such things that you need to ask a question - "Is it good or bad about them?" But you will ask him and - you immediately understand that it is good and that and that. On Tuesday, this immediately referred to the three first persons of the state: D. Medvedev, V. Putin and P. Kirill, although not in all cases they were newcomers themselves.

1. I did not ask - they will not have mercy. The head of the Human Rights Council, M. Fedotov, said that D. Medvedev (President) " put a negative resolution on an expert opinion on the pardon institution ." In conclusion, it was meant that the head of state has the right to have mercy on the convict, even if there was no appropriate petition from it.

Moreover, D. Medvedev did not just write in the corner of the expert statement “no” with a blue pencil, but gave a detailed explanation. Fedotov: " The president in his resolution indicated that he does not understand why he should mercy on a person who did not ask him for pardon." Meanwhile, according to Fedotov, " we presented him the opinion of ten experts in the field of constitutional law. He did not agree with them ." Well, even the dispute did not take place.

In general, in this story there is an obvious Ukrainian trace, it is possible that the unconscious. This, in essence, is the history of the relationship of V. Yanukovych and Yu.Timoshenko, one of the series. “Oh,” says V. Yanukovych to the public, “I am ready to sign a pardon, let it only send a petition.” "Right now - Tymoshenko replies from the dungeon, - will not wait." The logic is simple: if the petition sends, it pleads guilty. And she was convicted unrighteously, let her draw himself and admits this. And so far she will be in prison. In other words, the point is guilty.

Thus, in the opinion of D, Medvedev there is even common sense: if he has mercy on those who do not ask, then as if even by his will removes from pardoned guilt. No, there is absolutely no in Russian practice a mechanism for compulsory pardon of condemnation, not involving the simultaneous removal of guilt from it. And it is unlikely that it can be developed, because it is already some kind of voluntarism will come out. Again, this is an extremely corruption-intensive idea: after all, someone would give such lists with motivations to the president, he himself was not looking for the truth in the colonies.

But, on the other hand, you can also take into account the articles. In some cases, such measures could be educational. Say, from classical literature, a situation is known when someone around November breaks the window and joyfully gives up the police to serve the winter in the warmth. And here the threat to be pardoned without demand would stop many. And the whole point is that for some reason the president thought that he needed to mercy on some iconic characters. But could one think about the people?

2. National Guard - Need! The press secretary of V. Putin D. Peskov denied information about the possible creation of the President’s national guard: " The allegations that Vladimir Putin plans to create some units, new types of special services are absolutely not true ."

No, well, it is clear that in this form it looks doubtful. In this format, the idea would mean that over the 12 years of the leadership of V.V. Putin, all the power departments of the country completely bloomed, they were also enlightened and V.V. Putin should be created not that again, but at least something reliable "for himself" (according to D. Peskov). In addition, this "for itself" looks like an expression that does not correspond to the confidence of the authorities that it is strong than ever. Everything is clear here. But if you make accents not on "new types of special services" and "for yourself", then the National Guard is completely good. Firstly, it's beautiful. That is, it will be beautiful when they create.

Actually, the topic arose in connection that the media was information that yes, a new power structure may appear - the National Guard. But, once again, in the first, it can be beautiful - if you have to have and use them on different days of the year to create a good mood in citizens? All other aircraft, as well as secret special services, should wear something considerable or civilian, so it is time to show an elegant appearance of the armed forces. And this would, secondly, symbolized the growing power of the power and much more.

In general, the problem could arise from the fact that, according to the “Independent Newspaper”, the number of the guard was supposed to be about 400 thousand people. 400 or 4,000 people would be appropriate within the framework of the task of decorating state life, and 400 thousand - not only, but almost all the Airborne Forces, the Air Force, the Navy, the Military Police and the EMERCOM units together. Just a Russian defense team and too many Kuter. But if for representative purposes 4,000 in the form from Yudashkin, then it would be good. They would also specifically represent the state to its citizens - this is third. But, in fact, D. Peskov’s refutation does not exclude this opportunity.

3. Breguet shows the best. The main aesthetic satisfaction for the week can be obtained here: Alexander Razuvaev, an “independent stock analyst”, wrote a note called “ Authority of the Church ”. In it, he revealed all topics related to mutual relations of Laksheri class goods and the Russian Orthodox Church MP. The reason for the article was the conversation of the Patriarch of Moscow and All Rus' Kirill and V. Solovyov, in which the Patriarch said that he had never put on Breguet watches for $ 30 thousand. That is, he was really presented to him, but he did not put them on, so in the photograph - so, collage. It was an entry into the topic, and then the author’s thought produced several (three, like) vectors of thought.

Having touched on the topic of the Patriarch’s resolution for Breguet by a certain public, the author notes that “ according to some of these characters, the 282nd article has been crying for a long time, however, unfortunately, in Russia it has been working extremely selectively. After all, insulting the Patriarch, these characters in the Internet space insult all Orthodox Russians. And from my virtual activity, it is high time for them to get a real prison term .”

But then the other side of the matter: " It should also be said that for more than a thousand years Orthodoxy is the spiritual basis of Russia. Therefore, any attacks on the main Russian denomination should be regarded as a blow to Russian statehood as a whole ." Here, of course, is not the 282nd, but at the level of treason to the Motherland. So ambivalence is already in the first layer of thoughts of the author.

The first layer is followed by the second layer, even more correct: “ However, I wanted to talk about something else: why, in fact, the patriarch cannot wear Breguet watches?! A successful entrepreneur, a high -class engineer, a stock manager or just a secured person can, and the head of the Russian Church, can not be considered other people's money?! Maybe you should strain your brains and try to earn more? ”

Of course, this is a mystical moment: all the mentioned categories citizens receive material values ​​from the material world through specific labor with this material world. While the Patriarch achieves the same effect, working with the world quite intangible. Of course, the proof of such a fact would have a useful propaganda effect on hitherto not churching, but (in Dano - alas) there is also ambivalence. Is the intangible world tend to respond to relations with him in a material way? Here, it seems, a blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, in connection with which the author of the note should be sent immediately to Solovki (or what is now instead of them).

But while he is not yet there, it continues also this is also fine: “ Neither the Byzantine nor the Russian Church was a beggar. This is a historical tradition that was formed when it was not even smelled of a pro-Western liberal democracy. After all, the luxury of the royal, khan, royal or imperial palaces or apartments is not very clear why religious power should give in to the religious authorities. secular ". Yes, there are Solovki once again: the author of the note claims that the ROC MP-judging by its manners-remained in time in which the Byzantine Church, the Khan-Tsarsky-Korolevsky-Immaurian palaces. In general, according to this point, Solovki can already be sent to the employees of the View Internet Gazeta that contributed to the publication of this essay.

What should they rely on in such a situation? The author of the notes knows what to rely on, but this is the devil - not the Russian Orthodox Church MP: “ We, Russian citizens, are no longer weak and not poor, but strong and rich. But because of natural modesty, we sometimes shy like to pronounce it loudly. Therefore, it will be very good if the force of the renewed, who has long risen from the knees of the country in the Munich speech or our fighters on the streets or our fighters on the streets. Tskhinval, but a loud and confident voice of a strong and rich Russian church. "

Channel analysts write beautifully today: "loud and confident", "strong and rich." Not to mention how the ROC MP is proposed to demonstrate their strength. But in the amount of HM, the Solovki once again, if not anathema: this is, in fact, Protestant ethics are attached to the Russian Orthodox Church MP - only not oriented on individual members of the corresponding community, but to the leadership of the State Christian process in the Russian Federation.

What is the acuity of the moment: well, for the author of the author or to the parameters for the Patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church MP? And so good, and that way.