Anders Breivik, who admitted the organization of the explosion in Oslo and in the massacre of boys and girls on the island of Utoya, came to trial in the capital of Norway with an explanation of the motives of his actions. " I have committed the most spectacular and sophisticated political attack on Europe since the Second World War ," Breivik said.
Our world is contradictory and like Breiviks will always be. Andres knew that he would become a symbol. The question raised by him responds deep down to the Norwegians, but the humanistic superstructure does not give them the opportunity to speak out about this. And all this is in the hyperuspeed (social plan) Norway, and what do the inhabitants of Paris, London, Berlin think?
What punishment is true for Breivik? Anders faces the maximum of 21 years of prison. Brayvik himself believes that there are only 2 fair sentences: either to justify (and recognize the righteousness of his ideas), or to execute.

And he is right. 21 years old for 77 deaths? This is unnatural . No one will say that this is fair ... So why is it? Humanism will never become a global behavior strategy. There will always be the question "nature -shaped or humanism?"
Breivik knew that those who raise this issue become a kind of symbols (heroes) of one of the parties. No, the monuments will not erect him, but they will write books ...
When you ask this question ... you will have one "bright" example of an answer.
To execute, you can’t have mercy.