Three times a hundred...

In the Leninsky District Court of the city of Kemerovo, a hearing on the case of falsification of the results of the expression of will in the recent presidential elections is due to begin these days (May 3). An ordinary plot in modern times. With a completely predictable result, I'm afraid. I would be glad to be wrong, but for some reason it seems to me that, having closed his eyes tightly, Judge Orlova will not see any “falsifications” at Kemerovo polling station 297. How many of her colleagues throughout Russia “don’t see”, to whom the hand of fate has now thrown proceedings with violations at hundreds of other sites.

However, one can speak about the hand of fate with a great degree of convention. Cases are distributed among judges by court chairmen. In the judicial class, of course, people are different, but those cases where it is necessary to “close your eyes” are usually given by the chairmen to precisely those judges who know how to obediently close their eyes at the right moment.

Therefore, away with pretentious talk about legality, justice and honor. Both the falsifiers themselves and those who deflect them from responsibility only laugh carelessly at these concepts. I will limit myself to the technological side of the matter. For history. Someday some pundit will write a dissertation on the practice of electoral fraud during the Putin period, and maybe the plot will be useful to him.

So here's Document #1. This is the initial PEC protocol on the results of the vote count for polling station 297. Signed on March 4 at 21-53. In this case, we are interested in lines 4, 8 and 23.

4. Number of issued ballots – 1586.
8. The number of ballots in the box is 1586.
23. Number of votes for V.V. PUTIN – 1042.



And here is Document No. 2. The same PEC protocol, but with the note “Re-counting votes.” Signed on March 4 at 23-20. In 1 hour and 27 minutes, amazing changes occurred in the indicated lines:

4. Number of ballots issued – 1686.
8. The number of ballots in the box is 1686.
23. Number of votes for V.V. PUTIN – 1142.

Notice that each of these lines miraculously added exactly 100 votes. There were no changes in all other lines.

The mechanism of the “miracle” is as follows. Immediately after the end of the counting of votes and the execution of the protocol with the signatures of all members of the PEC (Document No. 1), a statement appeared from the observer of United Russia addressed to the chairman of the TEC Nikitina. The “honest” observer writes that she has doubts about the correctness of the calculation, since she did not have time to “visually control” the process.

The TEC of the Leninsky district of the Kemerovo city district instantly makes decision No. 19/46, instructing the chairman of the PEC Tuzhilkina to recount the votes at polling station 297. Based on this decision, the PEC also instantly makes decision No. 6/28 on a recount. At the same time, however, paragraph 4 of the TEC decision is violated, which requires the PEC chairman to “ensure the turnout for the recount of votes of those present during the drawing up of the initial protocol.” It is clear that the “persons” had long since gone home, believing with satisfaction that they had completed their difficult, responsible task quite honestly and conscientiously.

I don’t know who recalculated what and when. Maybe the court will find out. “When” – this, please note, is also an interesting question. After all, both decisions on the need for a re-count (TIKovsky and PEC) were dated March 5th. However, if you believe the mark on the repeat protocol (Document No. 2), the recount was completed on March 4, 40 minutes before midnight. This alone, I believe, could become a basis for Judge Orlova to declare the repeated protocol invalid.

Agree, if we accept the hypothesis that the members of the precinct election commission, while issuing ballots to voters during the day, were shortchanged by a whole hundred, we will have to recognize them as irresponsible slobs and bunglers. And if we accept the second hypothesis - that with their entire large team, under the watchful eyes of observers, they also made a mistake twice in the final vote count, and both times, again, by exactly a hundred... Well, I don’t know how they can be made in this case would be called. I can't find the right words.

I deliberately did not include all the documents I mentioned in this post, so as not to overload the text. Copies of the documents are available, you can read the statement of the Edrosov observer and the decisions of the election commissions on the website http://vk.com/golos_kemerova

Here's some additional information in case the press and public are interested in the case. The trial is scheduled for May 3, starting at 14-00, office. 26, applicant – Yuri Nikolaevich Korolev, who worked at site 297 as an observer. Information is available on the Leninsky Court website: http://leninsky.kmr.sudrf.ru/

It seems to me that the press should not pass by. This is simply a model situation, the quintessence of what happened on March 4 in many areas in all regions of Russia. The straightforward simplicity of the authors of the second protocol, who are deeply convinced that no one will harm them and nothing will happen to them for it, is touching.

In fact, the chairman of the PEC, Marina Vasilyevna Tuzhilkina, is an honored person. Deputy director of Kemerovo school No. 92 (polling station 297 was located in this school). Teacher of the highest category. Excellent student of public education of the Russian Federation. Labor veteran. Winner of the competition for the best teachers of the Russian Federation. Responsible for educational work at school. Who will allow such a distinguished youth educator to be recognized as a criminal!