Save yourself who can!

Humanity is threatened with a terrible danger: it is close to the end of “building world domination of the Jewish oligarchy. There is already a shadow world government. ” The peoples, which, in order to devour from the implementation of the “moral ideal of socialism”, were completely defenseless in the face of “financial, Jewish and Masonic associations having state (legal) and official religious status”.

But salvation is coming. Even, one might say, it has already come. Its recipe is contained in the same book “Collage or Renaissance: Russia and the World through the Eyes of Science” (M.: Algorithm, 2011), from which the above formulation of the threat is borrowed. Its authors - Vera Mysina and Leonid Malinovsky - see the root of the plight of the world that “the delimitation of science and religion, the exclusion of its fantastic elements led to the exclusion of its ethical moral norms. As the saying goes, "the child was spilled with water." At the same time, there was an exclusion from the social science of states with a moral ideological structure, the exclusion of the possible civilizational path of Russia-SSR. ”

The authors claim neither much nor little or a new triumphant fusion of knowledge and faith, algebra and morality, and develop the “Orthodox-socialist ideas of world organization, which allow us to continue the progressive development of Russia and overcome world moral degradation. Including the systemic crisis of liberalism-catapilism. ”

The synthesis of “model-constructive thinking” (MKM) and “Aryan values” is practically proposed (Orthodoxy is revered by their reincarnation). Already with the first component, the situation is not in the most prosperous way. The essence of the new epistemology from the reviewed book is not possible, since it is praised in every way, but it is not really explained. And although, according to the authors, “the system of knowledge of MKM is a generally accepted working scheme for specialists in the artificial intelligence industry”, nothing indicates this generally accepted, and all available links lead to a few opuses of the lonely Mr. Malinovsky, who also do not clarify at all. And to understand what the essence of MKM would very much like to, it will promise it to the golden mountains, for example, it allows “to exclude elements of transcendental knowledge from science, to determine the degree of adequacy of knowledge of the realities of being, to exclude inadequate or false theories by the degree of complexity or pretentious constructions.”

The last claim, however, is obviously completely unfounded, since all the historical information and concepts that the applicants of universal salvation put in the foundation of their theory are undoubtedly false and modern science has long been rejected.

The authors in all seriousness invite us to return to the theological fantasies of Alexei Khomyakov, who in the 1840s all the diversity of world religious experience to the struggle of the Iranian and Kushite “principles”. According to Khomyakov, Iranian religions, to which he attributed the beliefs of Ancient Iran, Judaism and Christianity, are based on “moral freedom”, while in Kushite (from Kush-the ancient name of Nubia) the spirit of necessity, captivity (shivaism, Buddhism, Zoroastrianism, Baalism, Hellenic-Roman paganism, etc.).

Back in 1904, the sympathetic of Khomyakov - Nikolai Berdyaev was forced to admit that in this part his legacy "could not stand historical criticism." But our designers of world salvation are not at all embarrassed and continue to play enthusiastically with the terminology of Khomyakov, arbitrarily prescribing the same cultures of either Aryan or Kushite, and the properties of them are beneficial, then destructive. So on page 55 to the reader reports that “the Aryan-Kushite organization of society and the violent religious-worldview fantasies and the fragmentation of Hellas did not satisfy the thinking part of the ancient Greek society. As a result, there were a lot of philosophical directions that could not form the basis of the ideological doctrine of the ancient world. ”

And already on page 71, he is surprised to discover that "at present, unlike the states of ancient Greece, the world oligarchy is cultivating the lack of a unified ideological doctrine, sophistry and eclecticism in science, making it difficult to transition from world perversion to world traditional society."

The “perversion” is not a curse, but the term, since the authors suggest that we return to the theory of the Greek historian Polybius (II century BC), who believed that the whole variety of these forms is exhausted by three “true” (monarchy, aristocracy, democracy), which in the absence of “unifying moral ideological ideological ideological ideological ideological”. Doctrines ”degenerate into“ perverted ” - tyranny, oligarchy and ocherocracy. This theory, in addition to venerable prescription, does not possess other virtues and does not at all come together with the ideas of social sciences - sociology, political science and history in their modern form.

In general, with a prolonged reading of the attentive reader, a persistent suspicion arises that the authors with science are not at all familiar and mount their mosaic constructions from fragments of various, often not mating fantasy schemes in any way, if only they were more will be more will. For example, the fantastic idea is that “Arians are protorussian or more widely, Proto-Slavic tribes, which, apparently, were forced to migrate to the south, where they laid the foundation of the Indian, Buddhist, Iranian (Zoro-Astrian) civilizations,” is clearly gleaned from the Scriptures of Paul Globa. Of course, one can believe the revelations of an venerable astrologer, drawing his information from the highest astral spheres, but with the data of modern archeology, these visions have nothing to do.

The authors generally demonstrate amazing liberties in the treatment of facts. Self -and -playing in this opus, strictly speaking, any phrase. Here are offhand the “geopolitical” sentence of Russia. It is as if she can never get out of the traditional Orthodox-self-contained “ruts”, since the properties of the soil themselves do not allow this. In the proof, it is indicated that “other civilizations, for example, Islamic civilization of Tatar-Mongols, have disappeared in the Russian space. As described in the history of Solovyov ... ". We are not talking about the advantages of geopolitics, which has long lost the status of a scientific hypothesis and passed into scraps, i.e. The exceptional use of various intellectual scammers, usually recommended by “social thinkers”. But the fact: Sergey Solovyov wrote a detailed history of Russia and did not specifically analyze the death of the Mongolian power, the term “civilization” did not use this meaning and, of course, knew that at the time of the heyday of the empire, created by Genghis Khan, was held by paganism, and Islam took only on the eve of the final death in the XIV century.

Only such truly Aryan liberties allows the writers to interpret the collapse of the Russian Empire in primitive-consoirological terms, and the creation of the USSR as the implementation of the "alternative version of the Jewish world domination" on the basis of "corporate and ideological components associated with the God-chosen leadership of the rest of humanity, which, under certain conditions, goes into financial and material dominance." The authors describe the conditions with their characteristic certainty: “The world factory and the total control of the“ world factory ”of the Nomenclature of the Comintern, and in Russia the nomenclature of the Communist Party.” Through a dozen pages, however, it is found that the USSR fell victim to the “Judo-Marxists” who initially built the “perverted structure” and not able to modernize it. But it should not be expected from it from it. The authors of compliance with the rules of formal logic: Aristotelia, at least bluntly, are mentioned as "pseudo -materialistic."

In short, this amazing opus - the fruit of the union of deep ignorance with outright obscurantism - would not have earned attention to when one of its authors, the candidate of biological sciences Vera Alexandrovna Mysina, did not miraculously depress in a very promising chair of the chairman of the Council of young scientists of the Russian Academy of Sciences and did not show claims to the supreme power of the Russian science in the supreme power of the Russian science. whole.

Nikita Sokolov