"...Consciousness of one's iniquity"

The law, oddly enough, the matter is quite simple. At least its reflection in human consciousness is justice. It doesn’t happen with the law like with a wallet and Saturday in a Jewish joke - so that it’s Saturday all around, and here it’s Thursday ...
Netushki. Either it is everywhere, or it is nowhere.
If there is one (see France), then the president who won in honest, equal and fair elections comes out to his people as a triumphant, and the loser admits his defeat. And those who, God forbid, would try to prevent the winner from entering office, would have to deal with the police within the framework of the same law. And the same justice, of course.
But if instead of elections in the country there was a rape of brains with subsequent falsification (without any signs of honesty, freedom and equality), then the winner, although he is called, as in France, the president, is, in essence, a thieving urka - and what is interesting , this is exactly how the population perceives it!
And the population - in view of the secret nature of the ongoing political process - has every right to lie in wait for this urku and sweep away.
And Urka knows it.
This I mean that since March 4, 2012 in Russia, these rules of interaction between government and society have de facto been in force. The remnants of the law, the authorities took out to the trash with their own hands, and she was smart enough to do it defiantly. The orders issued to Kulistikov, Churov and Nurgaliev before the inauguration are the muscular middle finger of dear Vladimir Vladimirovich Junta, put on display for the recalcitrant public: on!
Well, thanks for letting me know.
The creative Russian class, which spent the whole winter entertaining itself by composing brilliant anti-Putin slogans for cheerful demonstrations, saw what was shown, thought, and went to collect a grenade launcher.
In a way, I'm afraid it's not even a metaphor.
Reasoning about the law in these new circumstances seems atavistic and smacks of demagogy. Isn't it strange to argue about whether Udaltsov violated the rules for holding a rally, after the security forces simply bled hundreds of civilians, and the press secretary of the new president complained that this was not done tough enough? „

François Hollande, protected by genuine legitimacy, after the victory calmly leaves for evening Paris, and our product of the Lubyanka swamps secretly rushes in a column of armored vehicles through the extinct city

“Are not the details of any judicial procedure against the backdrop of a difficult, long-term, impunity Putin's criminality not absurd? Why is it on that square meter where Udaltsov stands that the law should triumph in Russia? What a sudden Thursday in the middle of our federal Saturday?
It doesn't happen, guys.
The law is either there or it isn't. And I repeat: this is well understood both in the aforementioned France and in Russia. Therefore, François Hollande, protected by genuine legitimacy, after the victory calmly goes out to evening Paris, and he is greeted even by those who voted for Sarkozy, and our product of the Lubyanka swamps secretly rushes in a convoy of armored vehicles through the extinct city that did not vote for him ...
The cat knows whose meat it has eaten.
How Mr. Junta is going to rule under these conditions is hard to even imagine. Alas, he chose the rules of the game himself - most likely, on his own head ...
Today it is funny to remember: in the winter of 2001, at our only meeting with the future Mr. Junta, I, naively warning the new owner of the Kremlin against the slippery authoritarian path, allowed myself to remind him of the name Ceausescu ...
It doesn't seem to help.
We are waiting for the results.