Against the occupiers

Our disagreements with all kinds of #occupy this, that, fifth, tenth, are not ideological, but stylistic in nature. Where did this stupid occupy come from? Out of a shameful desire to imitate, to be “like everyone else,” or more precisely, “like in Europe.” Notice how the fashion for protest is changing: in December everyone wanted the experience of a completely productive Tahrir Square, but now in May the endless carnival of Occupy Wall-Street is also suitable.

To begin with, you can only occupy what does not belong to you, but belongs to your enemy. What's the point of stocks on Wall Street? The fact is that poor Americans in a crowd of thousands not only came to the symbol of Capital, but came and paralyzed the work of the world financial center, offices, banks, exchanges and stock markets. The poor came to the Rich, to their territory. In Russia, people who selflessly chant “This is our city, this is our country!” at some demonstrations, now, for the sake of fashion, occupy their own squares, parks, gardens, boulevards.

Russian people do not say about themselves that they are occupying, it is always the fascists and other bad people who occupy, the Russian people are taking over. The concept of “peaceful seizure” was introduced into the Russian political language by the National Bolsheviks, many examples of which were cited more than once. and the National Bolsheviks always captured what they needed - symbolic and strategic objects on enemy territory: commanding heights, administrative buildings, government institutions.

Instead of learning from the National Bolsheviks, the opposition thinks that it is learning from their mistakes. Instead of fighting, he walks. Instead of resisting, he negotiates in order to make concessions. Now everyone is just talking about how the protest has finally become widespread. I ask you, has this made him of better quality? No. And just try to argue with me.
Occupants in the Kremlin.