Domestic court political scientists and experts on extremism are clearly eating their bread for nothing:
In Cheboksary, Other Russia activist Dmitry Karuev was sentenced to 15 days under the article “Petty hooliganism.” The police accused the young man of spitting at the portrait of the head of state during a rally at the public reception of the president on May 6 in the Chuvash capital.
Hooliganism in this case is decidedly petty and unworthy of the unattainable heights of the victim’s position. To begin with, at a minimum, it was necessary to open a case under the article “Vandalism” or “Destruction of cultural heritage.”
Then there should be multiple interviews with prominent figures in science, culture and sports about how they cannot eat or drink since they saw the saliva of the assassin on the highest brow. The discourse should smoothly lead to the fact that in the person of who knows who they spat in the soul of the whole country and the one who spits must undoubtedly wash himself with blood.
Then I just see thousands of columns of indignant workers of the car repair plant going out to rallies at the call of their hearts and tearing at the bras of hereditary weavers in hysterics (NTV should show the latter in especially close-up, the viewer will like it), whose feelings were trampled into the mud and who cannot to look into the eyes of his homeland until this nit tramples its endless expanses, over which his liver has never been smeared. By this point, the troublemaker should have been in prison for two months already in the interests of his own safety.
At the point when the boiling of indignant minds finally reaches the planned maximum, the gray-bearded leaders of religious communities must speak responsibly, and, having severely condemned the emotional excesses on the ground, call for tolerance, pluralism and mercy, within the framework of which public wheeling followed by quartering and boiling oil, required in accordance with the covenants of the ancestors, must undoubtedly be replaced by only a 25-year imprisonment. The rotten intelligentsia trembles and takes stock of their foreign relatives.
The final stage involves the appearance of a discordant chorus of court political scientists and political consultants, on the one hand, complaining about the annoying need to comply with pseudo-democratic procedures and kicking the corrupt West, hypocritically condemning sovereign Russian traditions, and on the other, unanimously agreeing with the obligation to fulfill the demands of the broad masses, despite their savagery and denseness. The oratorio “The people are not mature, but are wise in their hearts” is being performed.
At the end, a national leader appears on the stage, calling on Russians to continue moving forward along the path of democratization, to intensify achievements, deepen initiative, spread the vision more widely and fully follow the mission commanded to us by our ancestors. During his keynote speech, he completely forgives his offender, but forced to follow the will of the people, he calls on the court to fairly but harshly punish him. At a court hearing broadcast throughout the country, the troublemaker is sentenced to public flogging on the execution site and subsequent deportation to Europe. Music from the opera “A Life for the Tsar” sounds, everyone sings and dances, glorifying the presidential mercy and wisdom.
PS . During the reign of Emperor Alexander III - the Peacemaker, a certain soldier Oreshkin got drunk in a state-owned tavern. He started to get rowdy. They tried to reason with him, pointing to the portrait of the Sovereign Emperor. To this the soldier replied: “I don’t give a damn about your Sovereign Emperor.” The arriving gendarmes arrested the brawler and opened a case of insulting His Majesty. They reported this to the Autocrat. Having become acquainted with the case, the Tsar realized that this story was not worth a penny, and wrote on the folder: “Stop the case, release Oreshkin, no longer hang my portraits in taverns, tell Oreshkin that I don’t care about him either.”