How Medvedev went to Pozner

When Dmitry Medvedev agreed to the air of Vladimir Pozner, this was a big surprise for everyone. And although no one was expecting sensations and high -profile statements from the former president, Posner program on Monday evening aroused a keen interest among bloggers. In the future discussion of the interview, both the supporters and the opponents of Medvedev agreed in one thing: the interview turned out to be non -proceeding, Posner Medvedev regretted, and the answers to the questions were ridiculous and unconvincing.

There were those who did not look at the program - and glad to this: Grigory Melkonian , the Executive Director of the Voice association, admitted:

"Patztal! Residents of Vladivostok have already managed to see Medvedev’s interview in the Posner program. Now I will spend more benefit with the time that I wanted to spend on viewing.

About my main quality: "It seems to me (!!!!!), I am persistent (!!!!!)."

About their weaknesses: "It is difficult to discuss your weaknesses, but, probably, it is still sometimes (!!!!!!!) the excessive rigidity in the answers (!!!!!!!) on the questions that my colleagues ask me."

About the governor filters: "Regarding the filters. We have in the law that came into action (!!!!!) no filters (!!!!!) from June 1."

On the separation of the authorities: “There is only one person who is able to give direct instructions to the government-the president. All other people are the advisers at best. The administration is an important structure that ensures the activities of the president. This is a conglomerate of assistants. However), throughout my stay in the administration, I cannot recall a single case when someone would control the government from the administration (!!!!!).” (Quotes - by "MK"). "

Deputy editor -in -chief of Echo of Moscow Vladimir Bartholomeev : "How good that, distributing and receiving awards at the radio festival, I was deprived of the opportunity to look at this interview at pah at him."

Member of the United Russia faction Alexander Khinshtein @Khinshtein : "I did not look at Pozner - I do not want to finally be disappointed ..."

The opinions of those who watched the program were divided. The supporters of Medvedev decided that here he had performed remarkably, it seemed to the rest that the former president was “played” and “insincere”.

Member of the Public Chamber of Korobkov-Zemlyansky @korobkov : “Listen, beat me with sticks and throw me with stones (preferably precious), but @MedvedEvrussia is an excellent speaker. I hear. Thank you.”

Political scientist Danilin Pavel @danilinp : "How disgraced Posner was when he asked about Medinsky. He even got it from the screen. What, Posner, Medinsky does not like? Do you think you like you?"

IRP Group General Bulat Stolyarov : "Sorry, but regardless of discussing any content, it should be recognized that Medvedev, who has come to the direct broadcast, answer not pre -sent questions - this is a somewhat changing landscape. There is a noticeable chance of the right refrepreatence."

Activist Oleg Kozlovsky : "So, according to the periodically appearing on Twitter, discussions of Posner with Medvedev, we will find out that Medvedev is still alive."

The editor -in -chief of the Ekho Moskvy radio station Alexey Vendiktov @aavst : "Fucking, in the midnight news of Channel One there is no its own interview with Medvedev - not a fragment. Didn't create news?".

TV presenter Vladimir Soloviev @vrsoloviev : "Medvedev is good, but Posner was lost ... passes by that. He does not catch the" ball ".

Journalist Olga bychkova @olgabychkova : "It would be much more interesting if he kept with Pozner respectfully, and not arrogant. Dramaturgy would have arisen. And easier to morally."

Civil activist Roman Dobrokhotov @dobrokhotov : "Nda, old Pozner Medvezhonka regretted. Once I only somehow stirred up on the topic of the election, but then sampled. I killed 40 minutes."

Journalist Zoya Svetova : “I watched the excerpt of the conversation between Medvedev and Pozner. What a miserable Medvedev! And for the first time I saw that he was a very unkind and insincere man. False. The only moment was when Posner asked him:“ What would you say to the Lord God? ”“ I would ask him forgiveness, ”Medvedev said. And it seemed to me that there were fear in his eyes.”

Political observer Kirill Rogov : "Country of perverts: everyone, it turns out, watched Medvedev. And what, interestingly, did you think to see there?"

Andrei Sokholutsky : "Medvedev at Pozner. Unconvincing. Everything is unconvincing." I was a successful young man. "Perhaps I do not believe."

Theatrical critic and journalist Ksenia Larina : “Medvedev at Posner is just the embodiment of cynical shamelessness. Yes, with a fee, with a call, with pathos.“ I’m not a tyr-tyr-tyr! ”)) The manners of the there are a long time ago. They are an inspired lie, a spoilage, from which they themselves are awesome and ready to believe in it.)

Posner, of course, let him go, but in general behaved quite worthy, in an adult way. It even seemed to me that at some moments he did not hide disappointment and thought: "Lord, what am I doing here? It is necessary to get out of here."

But in general, of course, the guys here were located here for a long time. This is visible in the manner and the manners. Such a fat barchuk. Recalled "Vladik" from the Balabanovskiy "Zhmukok"). "

TV presenter Tatyana Lazareva : “She looked at Medvedeva and constantly reminded herself who was and why I should listen to him. She didn’t feel any interest in him. All his charisma was thought up and manifests itself only in a clear articulation of unreleased and not interesting words. It was disappointed and frustrated that Pozner was migrated and stolen in empty Reasoning.

Alfred Koch : “Posner looked with Medvedev. Everything, as I expected. Only Medvedev was fussy and played. I even thought that he was Malza Bukhoy. Or under coke ... However, both of them are Sad Shit.”

Journalist and blogger Andrei Malgin : “Pozner asked the sharp questions, but still a couple. There was not a single one at all. Posner:“ Do you really think that there are no opposition figures in my program because I don’t want to invite them? ”Medvedev suddenly says:“ But I have come. ”What should he mean, or what? With the help of Marseille Poster, Poster asks about his human The weaknesses.

Telekritik Anna Kachkayeva : “So, the prime minister talked one on one with the best interviewer of the country. But the interview turned out to be passing. Not only because the roles were secretly painted in such television formats.

The main interviewer of the country, which is “about eternal”, is customary to go to the first persons of the country, which is conceptually and correctly - a politician in a mediatized world cannot otherwise. Especially if he is going to stay afloat. In the best interview of Pozner is what is called "chemistry": this is when, from words, views, intonation and pauses, physically felt sincerity is born. The shabby, woven from the energy of the coincidence of people who have fallen into one emotional wave that are interesting to each other and who want to talk about the most important. When the drama of the experienced beats in the eyes of the interlocutor, a shadow of doubt, and irritation, and joy, and sadness flashes on his face. Then we, viewers, feel what is called "breaks the screen." Such interviews require mental costs from who asks, and from who answers. Posner and Medvedev remained "with their own." Not spent. Or "Chemistry" did not happen.

And yet. Agreeing to the "conversation about eternity", a person should be aware that the screen will show the screen. Such is this difficultly explained effect of the "X -ray of character." It was no coincidence that I asked Natasha Timakov yesterday about whether they worked on the questions of the Pr and Prista questionnaire. Natasha replied: "Like all other questions, Proust Medvedev heard questions for the first time during the live broadcast. So he had three seconds to prepare an answer." If so, then there is nothing surprising that the sparks did not get out. There is nothing to carve out yet. This is not bad and not good. You just can't learn the scale. It is necessary to grow before him. "