Searched moral

"The crowd sees a nonsense, and it amuses it." So he wrote about the clumsy actions of the police to suppress student unrest in February 1901 in Moscow, the general of a separate corps of the gendarmes Spiridovich. The picture drawn by him is really ridiculous:

From the habit, the police acted ineptly, it is unreasonable, which only cheered up demonstrators and increased the common confusion and disorder. Most of all, the nonsense was in the arena, where they were sent from all sides of the arrested. The huge arena was full of people. Students, free, careers, police and several gendarmes squadrons. Screams, songs and neighing horses. Thick couples and the smell of manure hung over everything. No order. Several hundred of the detained public did what they wanted. On a heap of sand, near one of the walls of the arena, a gathering was organized. A student who climbed upstairs, the chairman, frantically calls the bell and then begins to speak. Galdez and speech. At the other end, the impromptu choir sings something. In the left corner of the entrance, a large group of youth arranged a living wall-round, behind which amateurs indulge in free love with prostitutes who fell into the arena ... The authorities were inactive.

Well, maybe the representatives of the Duma minority are also right, stating that the measures taken by the Russian authorities in relation to prominent oppositionists remind them of "the actions of the tsarist secret police on the eve of well -known historical events."

Of course, the nonsense. To such an extent meaningless that commentators-guards amicably hit in conspiracyology. Maxim Shevchenko, in particular, is sure that the searches were made by certain secret allies of the organizers of the Millions Marsh:

Today's action, searches of these people who were absolutely uninteresting to people before the searches, is an anti -Putin action. I am confident in this by 200%. Her goal is to drive people to a rally.

And deputy Alexander Khinshtein claims that the days of the head of the Investigative Committee are numbered and searches - "Bastrykin’s last attempt to survive."

But the journalist Pavel Svyatenkov came up with the more intricate of everyone:

*And now imagine that in November 2012 the United States will lead Romny (or let it be updated, more aggressive Obama). And the United States will want to end the post -Soviet space and Russia as a geopolitical factor. It is easy to do this - it is enough to bring down oil prices and put it on the oligarchs storing stolen in the West.

But for this you need an image, we need a picture of a “mini-imperia of evil”, led by “bloodthirsty Putin”.

The purpose of the current (and upcoming) events is to provide such a picture.*

In other words, in the Investigative Committee or where not just anti -Putins, but hires of American intelligence, have settled higher. This time I did not find alien and otherworldly versions.

The first thing that occurred to me was that the performers are given zeal not by reason. Very similar to the story of "demons":

Meanwhile, we had an adventure that surprised me, and Stepan Trofimovich shocked. In the morning, at eight o’clock, Nastasya ran away from him, with the news that the master was "described". At first I could not understand anything: I only achieved that the officials “described”, they came and took the papers, and the soldier tied it in a knot and “took it to a car”. The news was wild.

It is wild, although sometimes it seems that, as one friend of mine puts on, Dostoevsky’s script was signed and approved in heaven and “the word written” will come true (1 Cor., 15:54).

We will still try not to go beyond common sense, logic and current legislation.

The owners of the apartments subjected to the search received summons and were questioned in the UK as witnesses in the criminal case. Personally, I first hear about the search in the witness’s house. Maybe we are searched with the victim? Tomorrow I will witness an accident - and they will come to search me?

Article 182 of the Code of Criminal Procedure prudently calls the one who has a search is simply a “person”. However, in article 165, paragraph 3.1, where the procedure for the implementation or destruction of material evidence seized during the search is said that in the hearing on this issue "the suspect, the accused, their defenders and (or) legal representatives are also entitled to participate.

No witnesses. Suspect or accused. Dot. Paragraph.

“Before the start of the search,” says the code, “the investigator suggests voluntarily issuing objects, documents and values ​​that are subject to seizure that may matter for a criminal case.”

I do not know if the investigator suggested issuing items voluntarily. The impression is that he himself did not know what items could matter for the case. All that turned up by the arm was raked. In America, this is called Fishing Expedition: literally - a fishing trip, and in a figurative - this is the most imperceptible search: maybe then something necessary will be found.

The necessary is, first of all, Navalny’s dossier in Shuvalov and other high -ranking officials. Judging by the message that Navalny managed to publish on Twitter during the interrogation, investigators are primarily interested in these materials, and not at all the organization of the procession on May 6.

The norm, completely clearly and impudently violated by the Investigative Committee in at least one case, during the search of the apartment of Ksenia Sobchak, is paragraph 7 of Art. 182 of the Code of Criminal Procedure: "The investigator takes measures to ensure that the circumstances of the private life of the person, in the premises of which a search was not announced during the search, his personal and (or) family secret, as well as the circumstances of the private life of other persons, are not announced.

What the amount of money was taken during the search, as well as the fact that this apartment is the actual place of residence of Ilya Yashin - both are the personal secret of Ms. Sobchak. The investigator not only did not take measures, but also deliberately disclosed this information through the official representative of the IC Vladimir Markin.

It is also not clear on what basis the money was removed, how the investigation intends to establish their origin and what does this money have to the criminal case of riots on May 6. In any case, Ksenia is not obliged to explain anything about this. Everyone has the right to store money as it considers necessary, including packaged in envelopes. In the series "The Case of Gastronomer No. 1" Hero to the question of the KGB investigators, why money in envelopes, answers: "I am so comfortable." And the question is exhausted. This is in disenfranchised Brezhnev times, at the time of Vseslil Andropov.

Everyone is now judging and rowing about these one and a half million, and many gloating ones. Dollars in ventilation haunt the envious. The publicity was designed for this. Maxim Kantor surpassed everyone, who wrote like this :

If the theory of evil caused by corruption is fair, then the huge fees of the entertainment sector, the income of the creative class is the inevitable effect of corruption, these fees are the component of the corruption economy.

In other words, the income of show business stars is criminal by definition - why not be removed? And then a demagogic statement follows that "to imagine such income from a Swedish or German TV presenter is unrealistic." I don’t know about Swedish and Germanic, and the income of American TV presenters is many times surpassed by Sobchak fees. To make sure of this, it is enough to familiarize yourself with the table of the highest paid stars of the US show business compiled by Forbes magazine. In the first place there is not Johnny Depp and not Lady Gaga, but the TV presenter of the Oprah Winfrey. Her income is the means of advertisers who pay for the placement of their videos in the most rating program.

I wonder if Nemtsov does not have weights? They were not sawn during the search for an hour? Suddenly they are gold inside.

Laughter laughter, but not so funny. Of course, the searched and questioned now in every possible way invigorate, but some of them, first of all, Ksenia Sobchak, are clearly uneasy . This is understandable. If, in the sense of the ability to investigate real crimes, our investigators have long lost their qualifications, then in terms of psychological pressure on the persons, they remain high professionals. Solzhenitsyn in the "Gulag Archipelago" says:

When the 19-year-old Yevgeny Doyarenko and three young Chekists rummaged in her bed in her bed, in her chest of drawers with linen were arrested in 1921, she remained calm: there was nothing, they would not find anything. And suddenly they touched her intimate diary, which she could not even show her mother - and this reading of her lines with hostile strangers struck her stronger than the whole Lubyanka with her bars and basements.

This is exactly what the Ksenia and Ksenia. The investigator read her intimate correspondence "aloud, with expression and with laughs", mockingly lamenting, why she did not marry a proven Chekist. This is the most vile in the whole story with searches. Photos of the seized things taken by the investigation team are already posted on the website of the yellow network edition of LifeNews, for which, apparently, the secrets of the investigation do not exist. And no one will be entrusted that these letters will not appear there tomorrow.

For what exactly, who is still in the status of an unsuspecting witness, is such a punishment? It seems to me that she guesses, but drives this guess from herself. "But you were not warned that a person who is very vengeful, he is like ...?" - the leading "Echo" hints transparently. "Why should I take revenge?" - Ksyusha, who has already captured himself, is perplexed. Well, Leonid Mlechin agreed to the end. Evelina Gevorkyan reminded him of Putin’s conversation with Alexei Venediktov - about the fact that opponents are divided for the president into enemies and traitors. “I think that Ksenia Anatolyevna migrated to the list of traitors,” said Mlechin. And this, of course, is the most rational explanation of what happened if madness may have a rational explanation.

Eduard Limonov is right in his own way when he says : since you are doing such things, you must be ready for a search and to arrest - "answer for the bazaar." And do not spend the night at home. And do not have relatives, to be a round orphan.

And even better, as in the feuilleton of Saltykov-Shchedrin, "self-eat". Frightened by rumors about the rampant arrests, the intellectual begins to self -judge, and a terrible guess amazes him:

I even agreed that every writer could be a conspirator, without knowing or suspecting him; He can be a circle of intriguing by the intrigue and think under the influence of her, selflessly imagining himself that he thinks quite independently and independently. I began to doubt even myself. I began to think: is it really what I write, write in my own conviction? Am I entangled in betrayal, like others? Am I a conspirator?

But this caricature reflection is exactly what the organs want from the "witnesses". "Admit!" - "What, have mercy?" - "And you think about what!" And many, after thinking, admitted.