
It is reported : " The TV presenter Ksenia Sobchak, from whom more than a million euros were seized during the search, states that she has a declaration of income and extracting cash withdrawal ." Here, of course, there will be something as artistic ahead as in the case of Bastrykin-Muratov, who, they say, even shown on TV on the Russia channel.
Although, in fact, this fact itself is “ a declaration of income and an extract on the withdrawal of cash she has “ it has not been clear when. Therefore, his status is not clarified. It is reported in this form: "" There is a declaration of income and extracts about cash withdrawals, "she wrote on her microblog on Twitter ."
Well, when exactly this was written - this was going for interrogation, she said that she has all this or later, when her documents were recognized as adequate in the UK? But, it seems, by 14.00 (namely, the above -handed words appeared at this time), she had not yet come out of there.
Moreover, the interrogation was also not easy : the technical lane, that is, the building of the Investigative Committee was mined in the morning, so the interrogation was transferred for two hours. Then, it seems, they carried him out in some other building of the UK, in Balakirevsky (not far there).
Immediately you need to keep in mind the building itself in the technical. There, such a large square towards the street, everything is beautifully shot, and the UK is surrounded by a fair bars, not to mention the protection. Who could actually carry out this same bomb? Okay, false - but after all, this message was excited there inside? Is an employee of the UK who wanted to leave work on Friday early? It is excluded, he would have realized that this excess will only delay the weekend of the weekend.
In short, in the morning to the building of the UK, to the SK and Sobchak, attention has already been attracted. Although, in fact, in recent days, the UK from the headlines does not get out.
Background
The background remains a socially significant essence of the matter. Lawyers interviewed by RAPSI agency believed that Sobchak would have to prove the payment of taxes from the funds withdrawn from her during a search, otherwise it was possible to initiate a criminal case. Investigative actions of Sobchak were carried out as part of an investigation of the case of riots in Moscow on May 6. More than 1 million euros, 480 thousand dollars and 480 thousand rubles were seized. At the same time, the UK reported that a tax audit was assigned to find out if taxes were paid from this amount.
This fact asks the following question: it is unlikely that by June 15 (that is, to today) the tax audit was carried out, and indeed - why should it be appointed without waiting for Sobchak to try to prove the legality of his money?
And this is not to mention how exactly the search took place. Yes, there is also a theoretical part: a search of witnesses. That's purely abstract: someone became a witness to an accident. How to not search him, in fact? Regarding the search with Sobchak, Lawyer Reznik said, it seems that anyone can have a search, but in the framework of a certain criminal case, but not the one who is assigned the status of a witness. These words were in retelling, so it is quite possible to distort the signal, and Reznik had in mind something else. Actually, the fact of life is that no one really understands whether the witnesses are searching and this topic is not discussed.
S. Mitrofanov (understanding something in this matter) at the editorial office of the editorial office and yes, found something from some scientific, that is, the theoretical article: “ Unfortunately, the law does not list in which“ exceptional cases ”the search is possible without the consent of the head of the investigative body and court decision. It turns out that the grounds do not apply to the head There are no list and content of these very cases . " Here, there is a link to the "head of the investigative body", so everything is obviously ok. However, there is not a word about witnesses.
But next to it is another topic: the appearance of the shooting (in particular - seized money) in Life -Lifnyus . On what grounds, representatives of this edition were present under investigative actions (or received their documentation) remained under -pronounced. "Life -Yufnyus" is now a historiographer of the Investigative Committee?
Well, they also described the letters: "As Life News already reported, law enforcement officers who came to the Sobchak apartment early on the morning of June 11 found Ksenia Anatolyevna in Dezabilia: the main blonde of the domestic show business opened the door, being in thongs and Topless ." Well, probably, this is all nothing and K. Sobchak with A. Gabrelyanov Also, they will soon hold each other's hands.
Everything is not in vain!
Here, probably why all this was ... no, here is not about conspiracyology or the development of something. Everything that happens in the world certainly serves the emergence of masterpieces of the creativity of the masses. On this occasion, the masterpiece has already been created. The author named Israel Shamir published in Komsomolskaya Pravda an article ” The people have the right to know all the Suvenue about those who lead him to the barricades.” When meeting with a masterpiece, comments should be silent. Further - and to the end - only selected places.
" Do not tell me that holding money is not a crime. Millions of dollars, euros and other currency in black cash, found during a search in the house of Ksenia (" Ksyusha ") Sobchak were to shock society, and especially that part for which the Sobchachka was a standard and a model of behavior. Honest people do not keep honestly acquired money under the mattress. It is done by drug dealers, thieves. Prostitutes, accomplices of terrorists, taxes.
... If Ksenia Sobchak is not under trial and the investigation, it means that two different laws are in effect in our country. One for all, and the other for the godson Putin. The first serious test for the new-old President of Russia is to apply the law throughout its severity in relation to the suspect, even if it is his godson. He covered and defended her for a long time, but his debt in relation to the country should defeat family feelings.
... The daughter of the late mayor of Leningrad-Petersburg, who privatized half of the city not without interest for himself and escaped from the prison only thanks to escape abroad, probably can finance the revolution, although it is unlikely to become. She grew up in a criminal group that made Russian politics from a photocopy full of dollars.
... Having millions of cache is legal, they tell us. Were the Patriarch's watch illegal? The mentor of youth has the right to millions in their pockets, and the Russian patriarch of gifted hours to put on do not dare?
... Despite the Internet and other niches, one group of people, the owners of the discourse, are the owners of the Reverse and New York Times, the owners of the news agency and the owners of the New York Times. They determine who kills whom in Syria, who is legally elected, and who is a dictator.
... Russia is inscribed in this unified information space, and the media trying to ignore the agenda and the policy of the external information information leaves the mainstream and marginalized. It is declared the Kremlin Rupor, and it disappears from the news report Googlenews. So, neither the Komsomolskaya Pravda with its gigantic circulation, nor the "tomorrow" with its influence, nor the weekly experts appear in the summary. But there the Internet radio of the Russian BBC service, Kommersant, Rosbalt, RBC, Gazeta.ru and New Gazeta, all belong to oligarchs or directly to Western information concernses .
However, the phrase " She grew up in a criminal group that made Russian politics ..." is the author ... how to say that ...