Krasnoyarsk civil activist Andrei Verbitsky, who irreconcilably fights Akbulatov, often with single pickets, or by putting up some information stands, like yesterday he put up:
He reports that they have already started calling him from the department for combating extremism, like to explain his position, etc.
The text is completely original. Verbitsky:
“Practically, one thing is enough here - this is the criminal suppression of scientific progress. I demanded to remove him from the elections, but this did not take place in the media (political genocide). Now he has received 103 thousand votes - 14% of the total number of voters in Krasnoyarsk, so we are adjusting the demands.
E. Akbulatov is guilty of economic genocide (only business close to power flourishes, small business is suppressed, and not only small business; if necessary, competitors with a billion turnover can be eliminated).
Guilty of scientific genocide. Any scientific developments or innovations were suppressed if they interfered with their monopoly, the rollback economy.
Social genocide is from social groups doomed to extinction to the notorious socially affordable housing.
Environmental genocide - here, for starters, there is enough environmental damage from the Krasnoyarsk hydroelectric power station, by the way, with the tacit consent of the authorities, environmental payments are poorly returned.
I will dwell on a specific example of the suppression of inventions and the rollback economy - the Ice Palace. The author heard about it when it was reported that the contractor turned out to be dishonest, spent funds, prices increased and costs needed to be increased to 843 million rubles, an auction was announced. Our group had inventions in this area.... for 843 million rubles it was possible to build two ice palaces and other variations (not without reason, based on a feasibility study based on our calculations, the regional government announced that 200 indoor hockey rinks would be built in Krasnoyarsk). The conditions of the competition were prohibitive, not counting the guaranteed collateral property; the contractor had to have its own design department (by the way, Krasnoyarskgrazhdanproekt does not have a license to design bridges across the Yenisei). Only with the unification and creation of a consortium was it possible to participate in the competition. The falsehood became clear when the government began to find out what had already been done, how much money had been spent? The fact is that according to the scenario, if other companies do not participate in the new auction, then the old contractor remains. Then, as we know, these 843 million rubles were also wasted, the price rose to 1.321 billion rubles - this is 16 times higher than the initial one. Then the funding was quietly increased to 1.7 billion rubles. The most interesting thing is that the project has been cut down, both the object itself and the social sphere (I think the required two multi-storey buildings were not built). It doesn’t matter whether E. Akbulatov’s share in kickbacks, ineffective use of budget funds, inflicting losses through the fault of the region’s leadership is obvious. This must be recognized, repented and part of the losses compensated (this is 100 million rubles each from E. Akbulatov, L. Kuznetsov and 300 million rubles from A. Khloponin), only then can Krasnoyarsk be led with a clear conscience, and programs for elimination of the above genocides. Otherwise, it is necessary to recall E. Akbulatov from mayor. (16.06.12 A. Verbitsky)"