Right Court - Perm court

Yesterday, June 19, at about 16:30, the magistrate of the plot of 138 of the Leninsky district of Perm Svetlana Voitko removed from me an administrative offense under Article 20.2.2. "Organization of mass simultaneous stay and (or) movement of citizens in public places that have entailed a violation of public order." I already wrote in detail about the case.
If briefly, the accusation is briefly: during the Perm “Million Millions”, I allegedly called for its participants to go to the Leninsky Department of Internal Affairs to free the detained Max Zhilin and thus organized an unauthorized procession and the accumulation of people near the police department.

Shortly before the consideration, all sorts of miracles with the materials of the investigation and witnesses began to go through - witnesses appeared who could not see what they saw and heard, materials about which no one had heard anything, etc.
A striking example of this is a janitor who, in his statement, wrote that the people gathered near the police department prevented him from restoring order and abandoned cigarette butts. True, people standing near the police department did not see him there and besides, none of them smokes. One police lieutenant colonel also distinguished himself, who allegedly heard that I called for an unauthorized procession and indicated the time, place and accurate formulation of this call, but the video provided by the police clearly shows that he was not nearby during my “call”, and a little later, answering my question “What is with Maxim Zhilin?”, I just arrived and I don’t know anything. ”

There were as many ten witnesses from the police (including the janitor), and half of them was derived during the court session. There were much fewer witnesses on our part, only four.

However, as it turned out during the meeting, the number of witnesses did not save the police. The janitor could not clearly repeat his written testimony and only repeated that they prevented him from getting out, and on what day and morning he did not remember, the lieutenant colonel contradicted himself and constantly blushed and mumbled, other witnesses were also not at his best. They did not even bother to watch the video from the rally shot by their colleagues, according to them, it turned out that I urged people to go to the police department and they even brought the phrases I said, and they all had different ones. In fact (and this is clearly visible on the video) that I (and other participants in the rally) warned the police that people could go to the police department if they do not explain the reason for the detention of Max Zhilin.

The witness that the procession as such took place was only one employee who pointed out that ten people were walking along the street who actively interfered with pedestrians. But his testimony refuted the testimonies of our three witnesses and photographs provided by the police an hour before the announcement of the sentence. They clearly see them that three people are approaching the ATS - I and the husband and wife of Vavilov. Like me, worried about the fate of Max, independently moved to the police department, along the way where we met with them. Another “police photograph” also refuted the version that the crowd of people from the police department interfered with pedestrians - the photo shows this cluster of people, and nearby the crowd of police officers. Which of them interfered with pedestrians more?

In general, the booth and nothing more. But the main thing is that the truth was won. As it turned out during the court, the new law does not just allow people to delay people on far -fetched occasions. The repressive plans of the authorities are torn. At least in Perm. And my friends and I will trace that it was so in the future. In the meantime, we need to win two more things - to protect the right of Maxim Zhilin and Evgeny Potapov on the slogans “Putin - thief” and “Putin is the enemy of all Russian”. Potapov’s case will obey today, the Zhilin case is still unknown when.