Shoigu drives away Moscow

The Governor of the Moscow Region Sergei Shoigu asked Vladimir Putin to return the region to some territories connected in early July to the capital, they wrote Vedomosti. He is specifically interested in part of the lands of the Odintsovo and Krasnogorsk regions. During the drawing of the expansion plan, they turned out to be Moscow inside the region. In total, such enclaves are three pieces.

Well, it seems, we are talking about clarifications and corrections of individual misunderstandings. Moreover, the deputy chairman of the regional government, D.Khokin, explained to Vedomosti that the unified infrastructure of districts and settlements was now violated on these lands, the power supply and housing and communal services systems are “dissected”. The same nonsense with the work of authorities, election commissions and court sections.

Also, about four thousand inhabitants of the settlements of Uspenskoye and Ershovskoye, a month ago, wrote a request not to join the president not to join the capital of the land and hold a referendum on this issue. Then experts believed that Shoigu was unlikely to return these lands of the region. The maximum, it can achieve compensation for income falling out of the regional budget.

But in the current statement of Shoiga there is a systematicity. Now, if you look at what territories he talks about. And this recreational center "Uspenskoye", lands under the future financial center "Rublevo-Arkhangelskoye" and the territory of Skolkovo.

"Assumption" can even be left aside. Because how did he substantiate at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum in June 2011 D. Medvedev his idea? "In order to improve the development of the Moscow metropolis, taking into account the creation of the International Financial Center," - that's how. Well, about Skolkovo - all the more it is clear that it was already partially built. So Shoigu here is not talking about the privileges.

In this regard, it seems quite logical that Putin’s spokesman D. Peskov told Vedomosti that Shoigu did not know about the letter. And the Moscow City Hall refused comments - that there is also a significant signal, as will be visible a little later.

And also a parliamentary center

Meanwhile, this topic exists in a complex. Medvedev had another justification for the expansion of Moscow. He also spoke of the creation of the "capital of the Federal District", which goes beyond the traditional boundaries of Moscow. Moreover, "with the transfer beyond these boundaries of a significant share of administrative functions of the federal level and, accordingly, state institutions ."

Well, and now, on July 9, the term expired to which all state authorities were supposed to submit proposals about their move from Moscow. “Izvestia” summarized this : “ The reluctance of officials and deputies to move to New Moscow prompted the Kremlin administration to convene a special meeting under the leadership of President Vladimir Putin. As the sources of Izvestia say, a fundamental decision will be made on whether to translate the state relations for the Moscow Ring Road or not .”

But the meeting was scheduled for July 9 - exactly Monday, to which D. Medvedev in time immemorial instructed to decide on the move. However, they said that because of mourning (Crimean) it can be postponed. That is, it was definitely postponed, because so far it is not heard about it.

From the publication of Izvestia it followed that the idea was drained. There, for example, D. Peskov was quoted, who stated "that the draft relocation of the authorities is being developed in the government and so far it is too early to talk about the presidential level of discussion of this topic.
- The project turned out to be much more complex and expensive than it seemed at the beginning. It is necessary to carry out preliminary design, the price of the project is incomprehensible . "The project does not mean the extension as such, but this same parliamentary center. But here one, the other, may also develop into a general conclusion.

Speech climate

Here, such a control reading is purely. On July 7, at the same hearing in the Duma about the parliamentary, after which the President had to be sent a crossing plan, Sergei Reshulsky from the Communist Party spoke very sharply about this idea in principle. His displeasure of the communist was not, in his opinion, the crossing will deprive citizens of access to the federal cubmary. In addition, it is curious in which words disagreement is expressed. After that, an interview with Reshulsky appeared in the Russian Reporter, in which such a question is:

" - the idea of ​​relocating parliament for the Moscow Ring Road belongs to the ex -president. Are you not afraid to oppose?
- Yes, she does not belong to the president! This issue has been raised since 1993, just before it has been discussed on the sidelines. If we really think about the fate of the country and that normal laws are needed, such a center should be. Well, Lord, it took up to expand Moscow, someone gave the command to evict everyone there, and no one thinks that first you need to decide who can be moved and who cannot be moved . "

Well, here and so, and that way: “ It was upset to expand Moscow, someone gave the command everyone there ” and “ may it do not belong to the president! ”. There is even a constructive proposal: to believe that D. Medvedev did not belong (well, if it is necessary to save his feelings) and gradually reset the process. Yes, it is not easy, then it should not have been introduced in force from July, but at least move it further, but - what was done.

As happened before

Another control reading on the same topic. On March 29 of this year, Kommersant said that members of the working group of the Public Chamber of the Russian Federation for environmental protection criticized the Big Moscow project. And even at a meeting of the group, a resolution was adopted with a demand to suspend the implementation of the project before holding public hearings and environmental examinations.

There were quotes: “ On this project, there were no public hearings, nor state or environmental expertise,” the World Bank expert Sergei Vasiliev. According to him, it is also necessary to conduct sociological and transport examinations. A member of the OP Bogdan, the Novok said that the project lacks a “ real public examination ”, and the deputy director of the Institute of Geography of the Russian Academy of Sciences Arkady Tishkov said that there are many Siberian-Jace burial grounds and “ simply unsuitable lands ” on the annexed lands.

But then this material caused the indignation of the Public Chamber, which stated that it would sue Kommersant. The first deputy secretary of the chamber, Mikhail Ostrovsky, protested against the conclusion that the working group adopted a resolution demanding to suspend the expansion project. “ This is all lies. For such things you need to punish,” he said. “This is the opinion of a comrade of the correspondent who was there.” The author of the material is Grigory Tumanov, who recently moved to Kommersant from Gazeta.ru .

At the same time, on the OP website, the materials of the round table are there, in general, thoughts that are quite close to the “Kommersant” are given. The protest, that is, concerned the saint: not my God, no one there is against expansion. However, in a somewhat strange form: “ We must understand that we will not be able to restrain the expansion of Moscow. Compromises are inevitable ,” Sergey Simak. No, why so nervous from one publication, if everything is decided forever?

And in the same, source material, Kommersant also interviewed the Moscow City Duma. Then they stated that it would not be possible to cancel the implementation of the project. And now, at the Moscow City Hall, comments on Shoigu chose to refuse. In general, by the aggregate of facts, bookmakers should already greatly increase the coefficient for those who play on expansion.