
On July 18, V. Putin signed a decree "On the approval of the composition of the Council on Public Television". The idea - the former once vague, albeit ambivalent dream of society - became a fact. So far, there should be an abstract, but by January, there should be a channel. However, there is already his Gender, Anatoly Lysenko. Well, while he is the only real there, then he is responsible for everything.
Previous conversations on the subject of the OTO and what it should be omitted, because it is no longer a recall that the public consensus was about the idea itself. But the idea was not filled with anything other than reasoning about the “interests of society”, the lack of advertising and, ideally, so that there is an opposition.
In general, Lysenko is no longer the only materialized, there is advice, even if his functions are mysterious. Will he will influence production daily, will not be? Its composition provides an opportunity for long (if desired) reflection on who all these people (in a good way) are on their minds (conditionally). The question of what could have reduced them together, just redundant - by definition, the presidential decree brought them. Well, this is how to hint at the fact that UZHK is not formed here. That is, they will not be formed by them - it will be created by A. Lysenko, but more on that.
List of surnames for meditation on them here . And here only a few names to understand that this link is certainly worth it. Here, from the very beginning:
Baranets V.N. - Military observer of the newspaper Komsomolskaya Pravda
Belza S.I. - Leading programs of the channel "Russia - Culture"
In Avilova N.I. - Director of the State Budget Institution "Museum of Fine Arts of the Republic of Karelia"
Dontsova D.A. - writer
Kizyakov T.B. - Deputy General Director of Limited Liability Company "TRC" So far all houses
Kozlov M.E. - Archpriest, rector of the Church of the Holy Martyr Tatiana at the Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov
No, two more interesting positions:
Nazarov V.V. - Artistic Director of the Federal State Budgetary Institution of Culture "State Musical Theater of National Arts under the leadership of Vladimir Nazarov"
Nemov A.Yu. -Vice-President of the All-Russian Public Organization "Federation of Sports Gymnastics of Russia"
However, the latter can hint at the sports component of the project. But only to the extent that D. Dontsov, S. Minaev and A. Prokhanov (the last two are also on the list) hints at the literary one. Or Soluyanov A.P. - Vice -President of the All -Russian Public Organization "Russian Association of Heroes" - to the patriotic. In a word, the first day of creation, the impulse is given, but the earth is still viscous and empty, and darkness over the abyss, and perfumes (referring to potential channel officers) are rushed over the water. Well, A. Lysenko should start with their materialization, he already said about it himself.
Lysenko explains
Yes, the aforementioned innocence, emptiness and darkness over the abyss are confirmed by the words of A. Lysenko in an interview - of course - "Izvestia" (well, in the evening in the decree, in the morning they have). There, Lysenko admits that earlier he himself was a fair skeptic against this project, but one cannot wait for merits from nature. You need to shake. A further part of the interview describes the situation with a potential journalistic team and, accordingly. With the mission that the channel will be ... well, to imagine something. That is, so far there is nothing.
" - Are there any volumes on the ether grid?"
-Something is seen. But for this you need to sit down with the team. Television is a collective thing.
- Who will you take to the team, who will make public TV directly with you?
- Those who go from all I will invite! I don't know for sure yet. Good people - they are all busy. They are all in demand, they all work. So, you need to search, select, lure.
- Smell? But salaries there will not be very high ..., this is public television ...
-That's the whole thing. These are a lot of questions. That is, there are more questions than I know the answers so far.
- Take Navalny, for example?
- Why not? Only now, what will he do ... write reviews? Although ... I would take it! But he is more active than the writer. It is important for us not that a person is somewhere, he must be able to write!
- Will you take the air on the air? It seems that in the fall part of the opposition want to create their own television. Not afraid of competition?
- I generally think that television should not be opposition. What is it - all the time screaming "Down!"? The opposition is part of the society. But her point of view should be present. Intelligent people from the opposition - should. Smart.
- There will be stars of TV past years? Who is this?
- Necessarily. Today I'll start calling!
- And the age of the workers? Maybe representatives of the creative class?
- Rather, on professionalism, on a combination of experience and age. I will take one of my students. ”
However, the questions themselves asked the Izvestia could hardly bring closer to the understanding of what could be called editorial policy. And, suddenly, here Lysenko had considerations.
Boring details
Given the above, the terms of exit on the air look secondary. The Public Chamber expects television will begin work on January 1, 2013. But what is (regarding the greatness of nature) the calculations of the Public Chamber? No, this is not the fact that they do not mean anything, but it is not clear what exactly they mean.
At the same time, Kommersant has already said that the launch of the channel could be postponed. The problem, in general, is bureaucratic. It was assumed that it would take a near the basis of the Zvezda television channel, which belongs to the Ministry of Defense. But there, according to the newspaper, they are in no hurry to give the channel. Lysenko also did not rule out that the deadlines would have to be shifted to May for “technical” reasons. With the Star, according to him, "there were no conversations yet."
But this does not look like his problem. It would be ridiculous when he was appointed, and then - he himself goes to persuade the "star" to blame for nothingness. Another decree should be, that's what. Well, in fact, there is about Gender. There is about advice, about the material part - there is no. Although, of course, this is curious if it is not there.
This is curiosity, of course, nonsense in comparison with the fact itself. Here, nothing, there is absolutely nothing, and then - Oops, immediately a whole channel. Public.