Selected passages about the dangers of homosexuality

During the Pussy Riot trial, it became known that the victims’ lawyer Mikhail Kuznetsov and one of the “experts” Igor Ponkin are co-authors of the report “On the right to a critical assessment of homosexuality and on legal restrictions on the imposition of homosexuality” (the third co-author is N.A. Mikhaleva). PublicPost reviewed the document and selected the highlights. Comments in bold - PublicPost.

Statistical accounting

We especially note that there are no judicially confirmed or even recognized facts of violence in Russia by Christians, Muslims or believers of other faiths historically represented in our country against homosexuals specifically on the basis of homosexual orientation, the number of which would exceed the number of cases of violence by homosexuals in towards heterosexuals.

Orthodoxy heals

The Fundamentals of the Social Concept of the Russian Orthodox Church, approved by the Council of Bishops of the Russian Orthodox Church on August 13-16, 2000, clearly states the need for the Church to treat “with pastoral responsibility towards people with homosexual inclinations”, the need and possibility of “Christian communication” among Christians with homosexuals, providing “spiritual support” and prayerful assistance to homosexuals in getting rid of homosexuality.

More than just sex

The wide prevalence of critical, including negative, attitudes towards homosexuality is largely due to the fact that homosexuality, in addition to being a specific personal and social-group complex moral, psychological and cultural identity, is significantly different from the lifestyle and special psychology characteristic of the majority of the population thinking and behavior and a system of views, has by now actually become an ideology, actively promoted by its adherents, which does not tolerate criticism, has an aggressive proselytizing nature and claims its universal recognition, universality, state and international support.

Oral-genital-anal suffering

The fact that among the significant main features and elements of homosexual “culture” are: the desire for nakedness on display, often brought to exaggerated forms of exhibitionism; a certain subject-ideological orientation of homosexuality towards the oral-genital-anal; the aggressive, violent imposition of homosexuality on persons who do not share homosexual beliefs explains why such public manifestations cannot but be perceived by other people as a cruel insult to their moral feelings and causing them deep moral suffering.

Arabs are also Semites

The artificially created word “homophobia” by combining the word “homo” (from the Greek word homos - equal, mutual, common) and “phobia” (pathological fear) initially contains terminological incorrectness and intentional semantic substitution, unreasonably attributing the presence of a mental disorder (phobia) in people who have a negative attitude towards homosexuality. The literal interpretation of this word shows its illogicality and meaninglessness. In fact, persons who do not accept the homosexual lifestyle, passions and beliefs, and who protest against the public propaganda of homosexuality, do not have any “phobias,” that is, painful excessive fears that force these persons to fear homosexuals. People who are not familiar with special medical terminology may associate the meaning of the word “homophobe” with a pathological hostility towards humans and people in general (from the Latin homo - person). Unreasonably attributing mental disorders (phobias) to persons who do not share homosexual beliefs is not only an unethical technique, but is also aimed at humiliating the human dignity of such persons and slandering them.

"Two-assed crocodile"

An analysis of publications by homosexuals about the so-called “gay culture” reveals that one of its characteristic features is the hatred and intolerance of representatives of “male” homosexuality towards women of normal sexual orientation; in essence, a racist attitude towards them, as inferior beings, inferior racial mind.

Thus, compiled by Vladimir Kozlovsky on the basis of many years of research, published in New York and subsequently republished many times on Russian-language Internet sites, the dictionary “Argo of the Russian Homosexual Subculture” and a number of other dictionaries recorded the widespread prevalence and use of derogatory offensive words and expressions in relation to women: “double-assed crocodile”, “double-barreled shotgun”, “wet-slit”, “empty”, “slapped in the face”, “bald spot”, “withered”.

They forgot the Trullo Cathedral (you don’t have to read it)

The above extremist propaganda, which is an integral element of the ideology of “male” homosexuality, is completely unacceptable and grossly contradicts Articles 3 and 14 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of November 4, 1950, Articles 5 and 7 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of December 10. 1948, Articles 3 and 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of December 19, 1966, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women of December 18, 1979, a number of other international acts on human rights; of the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence of 11.05.2011, falls under paragraph 3 of the Annex to the Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to member states No. CM/REC(2010) of 31 March 2010 on measures aimed at combating discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity, recommending that states “take the necessary measures to ensure that victims and witnesses of “hate crimes” related to gender identity” are contrary to the principles laid down in the Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to states -members No. R (97) dated 30.10.1997 “On the discourse of hatred”, Recommendations of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe No. 1933 (2010) dated 05.10.2010 “The fight against extremism: achievements, shortcomings and failures”, Resolutions of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe No. 1754 (2010) dated 05.10.2010 “The fight against extremism: achievements, shortcomings and failures”, Resolution of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe No. 1728 (2010) dated 29.04.2010 “Discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity”, Durban Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms Racial Discrimination of 2001, the Program of Action for the Implementation of the Durban Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination of 2001, the Outcome Document of the Review Conference on the Implementation of the Durban Declaration and Program of Action to Combat Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance of 04/24/2009.

"Gaping Anus"

Based on the physiological incompatibility of the body parts used during such an action and taking into account medically confirmed significant bodily injuries (significant harm to health) as the inherent consequences of such an act, sexual intercourse in the anus can reasonably be assessed as a form of unnatural, inhuman and cruel treatment of a person practicing anal sex as a "passive partner", as a form of torture. By imposing homosexuality, gay pride activists do not inform about the significant harm that homosexual relationships pose to the health of the people involved.

The question arises, how justified is the demand to allow free public propaganda of homosexuality, calling for the recognition of actions leading to a “gaping” anus and rectal injuries as an ideal and norm of relationships worthy of respect, and the refusal of such recognition to be considered prejudice?

State Department cookies

The purpose of homosexual marches is not to “promote respect for the rights and
human freedoms and a call for tolerant attitude towards sexual minorities.” These are, on the one hand, business projects, which is confirmed by the experience of holding “gay pride parades” (homosexual processions) in a number of countries (Australia, USA, Germany, etc.), and the “working out” of “grants” from various kinds of organizations, and on the other hand, it is a propaganda event aimed at achieving acceptance and introjection of homosexual ideology by the largest possible part of society.

"Excessive colorfulness and shocking pomp"

An analysis of the content and form of “gay pride” parades previously held in foreign countries allows us to identify the following common essential features: vulgar, deliberately excessive colorfulness and shockingly hypertrophied pomp...

"Innocent Children"

As stated in paragraph 2 of the World Declaration on the Survival of the Protection and Development of Children (New York, 09/30/1990): “The world's children are innocent, vulnerable and dependent.” It is precisely these qualities of children that the organizers of “gay pride parades” cynically use, imposing on them through such events destructive psychological attitudes and immoral value orientations, essentially committing psychological violence on them.

Business as usual

As foreign practice shows, large-scale propaganda of “gay culture” and homosexuality as a way of life is a profitable investment, since the emerging community of homosexuals becomes a regular consumer of appropriate clothing, cosmetics and paraphernalia, visits gay clubs, uses the services of special travel agencies for homosexuals, etc. p. An entire ramified infrastructure is being created to serve the homosexual community, exploiting the topic of sexual relations and human vices by promoting homosexuality and for profit.

Masturbation is also very, very, very indecent

The ECtHR agreed that there are certain boundaries of decency in sexual activity, and homosexuality, bestiality and masturbation are, respectively, indecent, that is, abnormal sexual activity and their public display violates the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

"Involuntary homosexual influence"

The violence of the propaganda of homosexuality carried out through “gay parades” lies in the fact that persons who find themselves unwitting spectators of such events are exposed to homosexual information influence against their will.