Superbizon Russian Art

Pussi nomination Riot for the Kandinsky Prize and this week is discussed by the artistic part of the Russian Federation, society and its media. So, for a reason, of course, the topic is wider than it was even presented by the PC Nominator Irina Kulik in an interview with Radio Liberty.

Kulik is like this : " I am sure that in the history of art and in the latest Russian history, if someone will write it honestly and adequately, this story will go down, and Punch-Pussy Riot will enter all museums of the world ."

It is logical, if there is such a feeling, then how not to nominate. Technical question: what exactly is considered an act of art per per Se ? Event in XXS, clip, court, media consequences?

Kulik , rather, is in total. Having mentioned the Russian futurists (“ who also had anti -lrical gestures ”), she clarifies “ I would like to draw another, maybe a less obvious analogy-with such artists of the 70s as Marina Abramovich and Chris Burden, who deliberately subject themselves to some tests. At the same time, the spectacle of these trials is a test for the viewer who should make his choice, how to relate to this. Not the Punk Molebn, but the conclusions followed by: I don’t know if the group members were counting on it, but, in any case, they accepted it and they behaved amazingly at the trial.

However, it is further said: " Both the world's resonance of Punk-Molebn is associated, among other things, with its artistic virtues, because the image of these girls in bright clothes, absurd, against the backdrop of heavy official gold, incredibly Yemok ." That is, it was also stylish: or what, or something, the type of the traditional and artistic side of the event consists, but the willingness to spend two years in conclusion-that arose this week-more important, of course.

In total, as soon as the action is drawn up retroactively with the offset of all consequences, it turns out that even before the appearance in the XXS, it was, as it were, artistically condemned two years in conclusion. But, probably, do not find fault. Although what is the pick -up, when art can do this and that, and two years are important here specifically. That is, the action has in mind the entire long sequence of multi -format actions. Ok, ok.

But that Kulik then wipes the co -author of the action. Here, she writes about "anticleric gestures." But what is the anticlericality in the "Theotokos, Putin of the run"?

Again , who - in the general opinion - ensure all these artistic consequences? P Utin, isn't it? Well, then the bonus must be divided . He really did this, he is not - it doesn’t matter here, because if art is what is considered by society (community) here and now, then Putin - since the initiator of the event is considered the same society - here is the co -author. There would be no judicial persecution - there would be no act of art in its fullness. Well, we can say that he did not want such consequences. Did you want a court and two years? Art Happens , and co -authors are co -authors.

And this is not taking into account the context. Rallies, posters at rallies and social networks about Putin: he is purely as Stalin inspires the creators, it doesn’t matter - with a plus or minus. The normal flowering of serfdom, and not by force, through orders or threats, but voluntarily, exactly what with songs ("Theotokos, Putin ..."). In fact, Putin formed so saturated with his surroundings that the masterpiece of PR could not but take place.

Moreover, if the prize also has in mind the intentions & concept, then after all, the one who induced them , he is the real artist. In this embodiment, you can’t even talk about the division of the prize. P , there is nothing more than those who stuffed the shark dick. I would like to give a prize for a shark award - what, to reward taxisodermists? Moreover, if the bonus is given to Putin, then it is instructive as an art channel.

But if he is not given a PC, it will be even cooler - in the option "for the Count de la Feres, this is too little . " And this is: and now the cube art in the Russian Federation is now equal to political thanks to whom? He is the main demiurge, and all the others are workers who sell his art war in his flesh. Well, if the artists so inserts from Putin, so for them he is the art itself. It is he who organizes a production creative to them, they do not know other meanings. Artists are now the most faithful Putin, truly United Russia. And then he, finally, is a new large style (this can be added in support of the nomination).